23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER<br />

3<br />

FACEWORK AS ALIGNMENT<br />

... a proper model <strong>of</strong> face dynamics must inc<strong>of</strong>porate the idea that people are<br />

interacting for the purposes <strong>of</strong> companionship and affiliation as well as selfdefinition<br />

... interaction is typically regulated by vafying degrees <strong>of</strong> an affiliation<br />

motive and a desire for self-definition. (Earley 1997,62)<br />

3.0 Introduction<br />

In the preceding pages I have introduced the notions <strong>of</strong> face and facework,<br />

and gone on to consider cultural variations in both the conceptualisations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

face and the linguistic realisation <strong>of</strong> facework (Chapter 1). 1 have also more<br />

specifically outlined how German and English communicative style displays marked<br />

differences along a range <strong>of</strong> communicative parameters, which points to variations<br />

in the way face concerns inform everyday discourse in either culture (Chapter 2).<br />

Having set out the conceptual and empirical terrain then, I want now to address the<br />

question <strong>of</strong> an appropriate analytic framework for systematically addressing English<br />

- German differences in the realisation <strong>of</strong> facework in ongoing talk. I have accorded<br />

this question a whole chapter due to its centrality to both the research questions<br />

and empirical foci <strong>of</strong> this study.<br />

I shall begin by outlining the main approaches to the analysis <strong>of</strong> facework in<br />

discourse, these being largely applications or developments <strong>of</strong> G<strong>of</strong>fman's and<br />

Brown and Levinson's frameworks (3.1). 1 shall then change footing somewhat to<br />

consider the contingencies and dynamics <strong>of</strong> the particular type <strong>of</strong> discourse on<br />

which this particular study is based, that is, sociable interaction (3.2). Based on<br />

these discussions, I shall go on to posit an approach more suitable than extant<br />

frameworks to addressing facework in ongoing sociable conversation, that is, an<br />

approach not having as its primary unit <strong>of</strong> analysis sociable utterances, but rather<br />

sociable selves, and their mobilisation in the achievement <strong>of</strong> ritual -or as I shall<br />

refer to it from here on 'sociable equilibrium' (3.3). Finally I shall conclude the<br />

chapter (3.4).<br />

76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!