23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Finally, additional explanatory dimensions have also been drawn upon<br />

which, although not specifically addressing face concerns, do seem to provide<br />

some insight into interpreting these competing styles. For example, drawing on<br />

Tannen's (1990) work on gendered conversational orientations, Straehle<br />

suggests how German and US-English conversational differences display<br />

similar characteristics to these gender associated styles. Germans show a<br />

greater general tendency towards the former more male oriented style<br />

(including for example maintaining and negotiating hierarchical status, exhibiting<br />

knowledge and skill, verbal performance, self-display, and employing minimal<br />

small-talk in favour <strong>of</strong> more abstract and non-domestic topics). US speakers<br />

tended towards the latter more female oriented style (including for example<br />

displaying similarities, matching experiences, employing more small-talk, gossip<br />

and personal experiences)".<br />

Of course, what the preceding exposition <strong>of</strong> German communicative style<br />

in particular points to is an orientation to discourse similar to that identified at<br />

the conclusion to chapter one by scholars such as Katriel (1986), Schiffrin<br />

(1984), and Tannen (1981 a, 1981b) (see Chapter 1). In terms <strong>of</strong> the poles <strong>of</strong><br />

ritual equilibrium set out in Chapter 1, it appears that the Germans and the<br />

English fall towards opposing ends.<br />

There is then a set <strong>of</strong> conceptual language which might be brought to<br />

bear on a consideration <strong>of</strong> the differences in communicative style between<br />

English and German cultures"norms' English - German communicative style.<br />

That is, the concept <strong>of</strong> equilibrium, the claiming <strong>of</strong> positive social values in and<br />

through talk, and related images <strong>of</strong> self pr<strong>of</strong>fered in talk. These are central<br />

themes running through extant studies. Neither the G<strong>of</strong>fman's nor Brown and<br />

Levinson's essential premises have been undermined by the findings to emerge<br />

from these studies, but the conversational work routinely and normatively<br />

engaged in to sustain equilibrium, or orient to negative and positive face needs<br />

has been shown to differ markedly. Further, concepts applied more <strong>of</strong>ten to<br />

account for East-West differences have been employed to account for English -<br />

German variations in term <strong>of</strong>, for instance self- and other directedness in talk.<br />

These suggest that not only positive social values, but the fundamental status <strong>of</strong><br />

Q

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!