Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

usir.salford.ac.uk
from usir.salford.ac.uk More from this publisher
23.03.2013 Views

I have by and large employed the term 'claims' (Cf. Goffman 197 1) throughout this chapter, to refer to the positive and negative symbolic stances proffered by participants in and through their conversational moves. However, as I intimated earlier, as ritual equilibrium is played out primarily, not through the expression of conversational moves but by the mobilisation of conversational selves, it is the nature of the selves mobilised in each conversational milieu that I want to concentrate on more specifically next. JRR

Notes to Chapter 6 1 The only instance of the application of a similar notation to naturally occurring conversation is in Pomerantz's (1984) study of agreeing and disagreeing with assessments in English. There however they are used to refer purely to favourable (+) or unfavourable (-) assessments. 21 use the term sequentially following to be distinguished from 'next turn'. A sequential placement of a response can of course occur several turns on but still be treated by participants as sequentially following some prior turn. 3 KPs is here to be differentiated from KP, a different individual (see Appendix A). JAQ

Notes to Chapter 6<br />

1 The only instance <strong>of</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> a similar notation to naturally occurring conversation is<br />

in Pomerantz's (1984) study <strong>of</strong> agreeing and disagreeing with assessments in English. There<br />

however they are used to refer purely to favourable (+) or unfavourable (-) assessments.<br />

21 use the term sequentially following to be distinguished from 'next turn'. A sequential<br />

placement <strong>of</strong> a response can <strong>of</strong> course occur several turns on but still be treated by participants<br />

as sequentially following some prior turn.<br />

3 KPs is here to be differentiated from KP, a different individual (see Appendix A).<br />

JAQ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!