23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What happens here is that KIP pr<strong>of</strong>fers a similar but more acceptable<br />

version <strong>of</strong> LP's. The bike stolen by KIP and friend in the first instance<br />

belonged to a friend. Second, was only taken as a joke - it was not serious<br />

theft but rather fabricated theft (Cf. G<strong>of</strong>fman 1974). What this and the<br />

preceding uniqueness claims are based on is petty theft (dust caps rather<br />

than the whole vehicle) or pseudo theft ('temporarily' stealing Jim's bike only<br />

to return it later that night without him being any the wiser). This in effect<br />

accommodates the stealing <strong>of</strong> motorbikes as an acceptable activity within<br />

the boundaries <strong>of</strong> positive social values; i. e. it keys the action <strong>of</strong> stealing<br />

motorbikes from theft (potentially non-equilibric) to one <strong>of</strong> 'childhood<br />

naughtiness' (already established grounds for solidarity). This remedial<br />

works by KID and RP (who ratifies the claim by audientially aligning - see<br />

Chapter 7) works to restore a momentarily threatened sociable equilibrium.<br />

As German conversational ists display a preference for the use <strong>of</strong><br />

objective discussion or agonism for the claiming <strong>of</strong> uniqueness (see 3.2), it is<br />

here that positive threshold breaches tend to occur, largely as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

incommensurably uniqueness. This manifests itself in agonism becoming 'too<br />

heated', talk where participants have irresolvably 'locked horns', or one<br />

participant being conversationally 'beaten into the ground', to the point where he<br />

/ she can no longer defend him I herself and the talk grinds to a halt. For<br />

example, in the following German example, HB and KH have been talking<br />

extensively about cars over several minutes preceding the point at which we<br />

enter. The talk has become progressively schismed as each participants<br />

strengthens his own standpoint and seeks to weaken the others. Talk has in<br />

effect been drifting away from a sociable argument to a 'real' one (Cf Schiffrin<br />

1984).<br />

Excerpt 6.15 Wo ist denn Peter? '<br />

KH and 1-113 have been talking for several minutes on the topic <strong>of</strong> taking cars abroad.<br />

The talk has become increasingly schismed, as both KH and HB draw on largely factual<br />

evidence go support their propositions. Alongside this, the volume and pace <strong>of</strong> the talk<br />

has been increasing<br />

KH: Es ist schon vorgekommen daß (0.5) einige Ausländer<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!