23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

uniquerness, specifically by knowing personally the victim <strong>of</strong> a serial killer. Both<br />

RP&EP and JL attempt to make and have supported such claims on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> having some unique relationship with the victim. However, the negative<br />

alignment required to ratify these indivuated claims is problematic, as what is<br />

being claimed as uniqueness turns out to be a more communal experience.<br />

Rather than have these claims ratified and aligned to in a way that signals there<br />

uniqueness and allows that particular claimant to continue along a more<br />

indivuated trajectoy, both sets <strong>of</strong> particpants effectively repeatedly pr<strong>of</strong>fer<br />

without suitable reciprocal alignment. However, again, the particpants manage<br />

to travesrese this piotentialy disequilibric moment in a sociable way, by<br />

expressing simultaneously adding their own nuances on a common theme.<br />

Both these examples demonstrate then how the pr<strong>of</strong>erring <strong>of</strong><br />

individuated claims aligned to in a manner that does not fully ratify or support.<br />

Of course, such not ratificatory aligfnments can also be evidenced by the<br />

considering German sociable conversation.<br />

In German sociable conversation, non-ratification <strong>of</strong> negative claims also<br />

occurs. Due to the German predilection for individuated standpoints though, this<br />

is less frequent in objective discussion sequences as by definition, individuated<br />

standpoints are required to make such talk happen and are therefore<br />

normatively supported. As, for instance, was evidenced in the English-German<br />

comparative literature reviewed in Chapter 2, during argumentation sequences,<br />

if a German speaker suddenly agrees with a proposition, the speaker who is<br />

conceded to (i. e. positively aligned to) may well feel somewhat bemused or<br />

even <strong>of</strong>fended (see Kotth<strong>of</strong>f 1991). In short, when a negative claim is made in<br />

German sociable conversation, co-participants are brought under some<br />

conversational obligation to support this by negatively aligning to it, as are the<br />

recipients <strong>of</strong> negative narrative claims in English conversation.<br />

Instances <strong>of</strong> non-ratification <strong>of</strong> an attempt to initiate negative alignment<br />

do however occur. The following excerpt provides some evidence <strong>of</strong> this.<br />

l7n

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!