23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig. 6.1 General Equilibric Model <strong>of</strong> Conversation (Positive and<br />

Negative Alignment) (see Chapter 3)<br />

S0CIABLE<br />

C0NVERSAT 10 N<br />

Alignment <strong>of</strong> conversational<br />

alignment<br />

selves<br />

NEGATIVE FACE<br />

THREAT<br />

threshold<br />

+alignment/-alignment<br />

alignment<br />

threshold<br />

POSITIVE FACE<br />

THREAT<br />

As I noted in Chapter 3, what this model allows for is a range <strong>of</strong><br />

conversation contingencies, both equilibric and disequilibric. In order to explicitly<br />

point out instances <strong>of</strong> these particular contingencies in actual sociable<br />

conversation, I will employ in this chapter a basic notation system (see table 1).<br />

Table. 6.1 Alignment Contingencies: Basic Notation<br />

Symbol Meaning<br />

N Positive self claim ratified<br />

H Negative self claim ratified<br />

(+x) Positive self claim non-ratified<br />

(-x) Negative self claim non-ratified<br />

(+b) Positive threshold breach (potential negative face threat)<br />

(-b) Negative threshold breach (potential positive face threat)<br />

(+r) Positive threshold breach repair / remedy<br />

(-r) Negative threshold breach repair / remedy<br />

L<br />

q<br />

i. dn

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!