23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

At the time, this proposal seemed essentially clear cut in terms <strong>of</strong>:<br />

a) what the'research problem'was; and b) how I would set about<br />

addressing this problem. However it soon became clear, upon gathering<br />

and consulting the literature on face and facework, and looking at the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the conversational data coming in, that this would not to be such<br />

a clear cut systematic investigation. I quickly came to realise that the<br />

conceptual, methodological and analytic tools for executing such a study<br />

were far from the clinical and incisive ones I expected them to be. As a<br />

result, the study took on a double mandate: First, the original task <strong>of</strong><br />

addressing German-English differences; and second the task <strong>of</strong> finding a<br />

framework and set <strong>of</strong> concepts and analytical tools suitable for the<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> facework in naturally occurring conversation from two different<br />

cultures.<br />

This thesis might best be described as equally exploratory and<br />

empirical in nature. This dual mandate is subsequently reflected in the<br />

organisation <strong>of</strong> the study in terms <strong>of</strong> the individual chapters, nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

analysis, and set <strong>of</strong> propositions constituting the overall thesis.<br />

Organisation <strong>of</strong> Chapters<br />

In Chapter 11 shall begin by considering key foundational texts, to<br />

which the majority <strong>of</strong> facework studies can be conceptually traced,<br />

namely, the work <strong>of</strong> G<strong>of</strong>fman (1967) and Brown and Levinson (1987). 1 will<br />

suggest that the fundamental premises set out in these two bodies <strong>of</strong> work<br />

are essential, not only to understanding the concept <strong>of</strong> face and facework<br />

practices in discourse per se, but particularly, to cross-cultural comparative<br />

analysis between cultures. Following this I shall point to recent conceptual<br />

debates addressing the concept <strong>of</strong> face as a universal, drawing<br />

particularly on work conducted by scholars focussing on non-Western<br />

conceptualisations, largely in response to Brown and Levinson. In<br />

essence, I shall show how, in order to fully understand face and facework<br />

as a universal phenomenon, the concept <strong>of</strong> the self - particular that<br />

advanced in Western readings <strong>of</strong> face and facework - requires some<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!