23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

particular speakers to the point where it was difficult for that participant - at<br />

least at that particular moment in the talk - to be unproblematically<br />

accommodated solidarically. Similarly, I argued that too much positive<br />

alignment might leave participants in a state where they felt their conversational<br />

autonomy to be threatened, finding it difficult to negatively align. However, due<br />

to the locally managed nature <strong>of</strong> sociable conversation, I suggested that<br />

participants may work to avoid such breaches or employ remedial strategies to<br />

restore equilibrium.<br />

In this chapter I aim to demonstrate how these alignments contingencies<br />

can be seen to be equilibrically being played out in actual conversational<br />

episodes in both English and German sociable gatherings. In terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

immediately preceding chapter (Chapter 5), the discussion and analysis shall<br />

focus on what were cast as sociable episodes, that is instances <strong>of</strong> extended<br />

conversational interaction between two or more persons focusing on a common<br />

topic (theme; issue; event) which stands apart from the preceding or following<br />

talk and in which participants appear to be collectively and reciprocatively<br />

interacting. Whereas however in the previous chapter I limited my analysis to<br />

topic choice and general alignment to topic handling, here I shall focus more<br />

closely on both positive and negative alignment practices as they were<br />

conceptualised in Chapter 3.<br />

Although I have posited the sociable self as central to an understanding<br />

<strong>of</strong> facework as alignment, particularly in terms <strong>of</strong> cross-cultural variation (see<br />

Chapter 2), 1 will at this point in the study refrain from applying and developing<br />

the concept <strong>of</strong> the self per se (see Chapter 8). The aim here will be primarily to<br />

move beyond the theoretical propositions advanced in chapter three to<br />

demonstrate how alignment practices can be evidenced by considering actual<br />

conversation as it is played out within sociable episodes in both milieu. In order<br />

to do this I shall consider alignment in terms <strong>of</strong> what are manifest as<br />

conversational claims.<br />

In order to aid in the explication <strong>of</strong> the particular approach to facework in<br />

sociable episodes employed here, I shall begin by presenting a basic notation<br />

system for marking transcript data for various alignment practices. This notation<br />

13R

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!