23.03.2013 Views

SAGA-BOOK - Viking Society Web Publications

SAGA-BOOK - Viking Society Web Publications

SAGA-BOOK - Viking Society Web Publications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Saga-Book of the <strong>Viking</strong> <strong>Society</strong><br />

Germanic era as being around the time of the birth of Christ, we<br />

have some five hundred years for the development of [z] to palatal<br />

R and something less than four hundred for the change [i] >[e]<br />

(the Opedal stone is dated to the beginning of the fifth century by<br />

which time the change must have been well established). It<br />

seems reasonable to suppose that [i] >[e] before the pronunciation<br />

of z became at all palatal, that is, assuming a steady progression<br />

from [z] to palatal R - and we have no reason to assume anything<br />

else - very soon after the end of the common Germanic era. It is<br />

thus not surprising to find men on the Opedal stone, but this form<br />

provides no guide to the pronunciation of R at that time.<br />

3. On p. 135 we are told that it is impossible to be sure whether<br />

the first a of the form hahai on the Mojbro stone, which is<br />

interpreted as the dat. sing. of a masc. *hiihaR «*hanhaz),<br />

"horse", had the pronunciation [an], [a:J or [a:]. While a might<br />

perhaps stand for [an] as well as [a:] (although one would think<br />

that only after a change [an] >[a:] would such spellings as hahai<br />

occur), it cannot represent [a:]. Nasality, particularly in a, is a<br />

feature which can be followed down to the time of the First<br />

Grammarian. He could still distinguish between heir, "hair"<br />

(non-nasal, < *hiira) and hiir, "shark" (nasal, < *hanhaR),31 and<br />

there is no reason to believe that if hahai is indeed the dat. sing.<br />

of *hiihaR and the word had existed in twelfth-century Icel., it<br />

would have had a pronunciation in any way different from hdr,<br />

"shark" In Swedish it is only in the middle of the eleventh<br />

century that the old *ansuR-rune begins to appear in non-nasal<br />

contexts and clearly represents [o:J, [0] rather than [a:], [a].<br />

4. On p. 135 we are also told that it is impossible to say at<br />

what period the spirants [13], [6] and [y] developed to stops in<br />

initial position and immediately after nasals: all we can see for<br />

sure is the result of these developments in the consonant system of<br />

"Klass-Altnordischen" It is, however, possible to be a little<br />

more specific. The Eggjum stone, which Krause dates to A.D. 700,<br />

has the form lat. This can only represent a pronunciation [land]<br />

since although the 't] or [6].<br />

Assuming that what is true of the dental consonants also holds<br />

good for the labials and velars, and there seems no reason to<br />

suppose there was a chronological difference between the orders<br />

in the question of the development from spirant to stop, we can<br />

say that nasal-l-spirant > nasal-l-stop before A.D. 700. The<br />

same doubtless applies to the change from spirant to stop in initial<br />

31 Cf. Hreinn Benediktsson (1972), 132.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!