SAGA-BOOK - Viking Society Web Publications

SAGA-BOOK - Viking Society Web Publications SAGA-BOOK - Viking Society Web Publications

vsnrweb.publications.org.uk
from vsnrweb.publications.org.uk More from this publisher
23.03.2013 Views

Saga-Book of the Viking Society discussion in the First Grammatical Treatise about whether one should write iarn or earn 20 ) . In Scandinavian languages the development of eu does not seem to be affected by the quality of a following vowel. The distinction j6 : ju in West Norse is due to the quality of the following consonant. In East Norse we find only iii. One could produce a great many more examples of lack of system and general theoretical considerations in Krause's book, but let these suffice. There is a similar absence of clear and systematic terminology. Dotted throughout the book are terms such as: "hellern Vokal" (p. 31), "dunklen Vokalen" (p. 37) and phrases of the type: "eine besondere Affinitat des I zu d" (p. 34), "die Aussprache ungefahr eines fliichtigen 0" (p. 83). These seem to me to convey no linguistic information at all. They are of the same order as the statement (p. 48): "Die Vielzahl der Komposita in den urnordischen Inschriften erklart sich wesentlich aus dem magischen und heroischen Gehalt vieler dieser Inschriften", which seems at the very least to need amplification, and the argument (p. 81) that the e of the patronymic suffix -ee in Hronea on the By stone (Kr, 71) was "weakened" to i in hxeruwulafin on the Istaby stone. I t may be possible to define weakening in a linguistic sense in different ways (Krause gives no definition), but one would hardly expect the term to cover the change [eJ > [iJ or [1J. Questions of systematisation and theory are not the only matters in Krause's book which require comment. The author occasionally shows a lack of familiarity with the development of the Scandinavian languages after the early runic period. On p. 16 we are told that the Eggjum stone (Kr. 101) shows certain traces of Old Swedish influence. Evidence of "East Norse" influence on the inscription is given on p. 143, and consists of (I) vowel harmony (e after A or a, i after i and u), (2) the form huwxa, (3) the form kam, (4) the word hi, (5) the form fok]. Outside Norwegian it is in the medieval dialects of Vastergotland and Skane that vowel harmony is generally considered to have existed. But in the written form of these dialects 'a' (in Vastergotland when representing raJ and [a i], in Skane raJ) in a stressed syllable is usually followed by 'i', not 'e' n Itis in most Norwegian varieties of vowel harmony we find 'e' after 'a'.22 It is not certain that the Eggjum stone has vowel harmony at all. We find solu and skorin in the well-known first sentence, both of '0 Cf, Hreinn Benediktsson (1972), '55-62. 21 Cf, Elias Wessen, Svensk sprdkhistoria I (1965), 61; Johs. Brandum­ Nielsen, Gammeldansk Grammatik I (1950),402. " Cf. Didrik Arup Seip, Norsk Sprdkhistorie (1955). 128.

Saga-Book of the <strong>Viking</strong> <strong>Society</strong><br />

discussion in the First Grammatical Treatise about whether one<br />

should write iarn or earn 20 ) . In Scandinavian languages the<br />

development of eu does not seem to be affected by the quality of<br />

a following vowel. The distinction j6 : ju in West Norse is due to<br />

the quality of the following consonant. In East Norse we find<br />

only iii.<br />

One could produce a great many more examples of lack of<br />

system and general theoretical considerations in Krause's book,<br />

but let these suffice. There is a similar absence of clear and<br />

systematic terminology. Dotted throughout the book are terms<br />

such as: "hellern Vokal" (p. 31), "dunklen Vokalen" (p. 37) and<br />

phrases of the type: "eine besondere Affinitat des I zu d" (p. 34),<br />

"die Aussprache ungefahr eines fliichtigen 0" (p. 83). These<br />

seem to me to convey no linguistic information at all. They are<br />

of the same order as the statement (p. 48): "Die Vielzahl der<br />

Komposita in den urnordischen Inschriften erklart sich wesentlich<br />

aus dem magischen und heroischen Gehalt vieler dieser<br />

Inschriften", which seems at the very least to need amplification,<br />

and the argument (p. 81) that the e of the patronymic suffix -ee<br />

in Hronea on the By stone (Kr, 71) was "weakened" to i in<br />

hxeruwulafin on the Istaby stone. I t may be possible to define<br />

weakening in a linguistic sense in different ways (Krause gives no<br />

definition), but one would hardly expect the term to cover the<br />

change [eJ > [iJ or [1J.<br />

Questions of systematisation and theory are not the only<br />

matters in Krause's book which require comment. The author<br />

occasionally shows a lack of familiarity with the development of<br />

the Scandinavian languages after the early runic period. On<br />

p. 16 we are told that the Eggjum stone (Kr. 101) shows certain<br />

traces of Old Swedish influence. Evidence of "East Norse"<br />

influence on the inscription is given on p. 143, and consists of<br />

(I) vowel harmony (e after A or a, i after i and u), (2) the form<br />

huwxa, (3) the form kam, (4) the word hi, (5) the form fok].<br />

Outside Norwegian it is in the medieval dialects of Vastergotland<br />

and Skane that vowel harmony is generally considered to have<br />

existed. But in the written form of these dialects 'a' (in<br />

Vastergotland when representing raJ and [a i], in Skane raJ) in<br />

a stressed syllable is usually followed by 'i', not 'e' n Itis in most<br />

Norwegian varieties of vowel harmony we find 'e' after 'a'.22<br />

It is not certain that the Eggjum stone has vowel harmony at all.<br />

We find solu and skorin in the well-known first sentence, both of<br />

'0 Cf, Hreinn Benediktsson (1972), '55-62.<br />

21 Cf, Elias Wessen, Svensk sprdkhistoria I (1965), 61; Johs. Brandum­<br />

Nielsen, Gammeldansk Grammatik I (1950),402.<br />

" Cf. Didrik Arup Seip, Norsk Sprdkhistorie (1955). 128.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!