23.03.2013 Views

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74 THE MOULDY MATERIA PRIMA<br />

The act of making, labor, was the prayer, ora. <strong>What</strong> counted in the<br />

labora<strong>to</strong>ry was the wordless work. The theoalchemists such as<br />

Georg von Welling, the ecstatic prophets like Heinrich Khunrath,<br />

the philosophic mystics like Michael Maier, and even the<br />

“scientific” psychologists like Jung all came afterward, with their<br />

heavy interpretations in <strong>to</strong>w. It is essential <strong>to</strong> remember that no<br />

matter how crucial religious meanings were <strong>to</strong> the alchemists,<br />

there are no books written in the labora<strong>to</strong>ry that speak <strong>about</strong> them.<br />

At the moment of making, the act is everything. Afterward, there<br />

is plenty of time—even centuries—<strong>to</strong> try <strong>to</strong> figure out what it all<br />

meant.<br />

The exact same silence is the essential trait of the studio. There<br />

is a wonderful liquid complexity of thoughts that accompany<br />

painting, but they are all in, and of, and through the paint. (That<br />

is not <strong>to</strong> say an artist might not think <strong>about</strong> anything, from Wall<br />

Street <strong>to</strong> Jung: but what is engrossing <strong>about</strong> painting is the act<br />

itself, and everything else is a distraction, or a way of not<br />

thinking <strong>to</strong>o directly <strong>about</strong> the unnerving importance of the very<br />

next brushstroke.) The love of the studio is an unreflective,<br />

visceral love, and for that reason the ideas I am setting out in this<br />

book risk being <strong>to</strong>o explicit, <strong>to</strong>o much dissected, <strong>to</strong>o open <strong>to</strong><br />

conscious thought. When I was working on these opening<br />

chapters, I sent copies <strong>to</strong> a number of people—painters, chemists,<br />

alchemists, his<strong>to</strong>rians of art and chemistry. Among the responses<br />

was a very thoughtful letter from Frank Auerbach. He says he<br />

feels the book is right, and yet “there is something else,<br />

something much rarer”:<br />

An Irish woman attending church and a sermon on “Family<br />

Life” was heard <strong>to</strong> say, on leaving the church, “I wish I<br />

knew as little <strong>about</strong> it as he does.” I feel what you say does<br />

not betray or offend my experience of painting. Everything<br />

you say is true <strong>to</strong> my experience.<br />

But—the whole subject makes me extremely nervous. As<br />

soon as I become consciously aware of what the paint is<br />

doing my involvement with the painting is weakened. Paint<br />

is at its most eloquent when it is a by-product of some<br />

corporeal, spatial, developing imaginative concept, a<br />

creative identification with the subject. I could no more fix<br />

my mind on the character of the paint than—it may be—an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!