What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna
What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna
THE BEAUTIFUL REDDISH LIGHT OF THE PHILOSOPHER’S STONE 183 a face. Perfect painting is imperfectly transcendent. Less interesting painters do not know what to do with the choice between substance and illusion. Poor painting does not push the equivocation as far as it can go, until the paint teeters on the edge of transcendence. An unsuccessful picture might have a passage where the paint doesn’t matter at all, and the forms might just as well have been photographed instead of rendered in oil. Then in another place the paint might suddenly become obtrusive, and distract the viewer from the contemplation of some distant landscape, bringing the eye sharply back to the surface of the canvas. It may be that the human mind can only think of one aspect at a time: either a painting is what it represents, or it is a fabrication done on a flat surface. 16 Or perhaps it is possible to think of both the surface and what seems to be behind it at once, in a “twofoldness” of attention that takes in both equally. 17 Like the Stone, genuinely entrancing painting wavers between the two possibilities. It is easy to be entirely bound up in substances, and think nothing of transcendence: every clod of earth is mundane, and every chunk of cinnabar, and even every bottle of mercury. Oil paint is as low and earthy as it is possible to be. On the other hand, it is easy to be unnatural and divine: for some alchemists Jesus is the Stone and the heavenly salt, and the world is suffused with angels and souls. In painting it is a simple matter to achieve an illusion of depth, and to conjure a world beyond the canvas. (Historians tend to think it is difficult, but it can be hard not to create some illusion with oil paint.) So painters do not work for either the divine or the mundane, just as alchemists did not labor over ordinary substances, or try to make wholly supernatural ones. What matters in painting is pushing the mundane toward the instant of transcendence. The effect is sublimation, or distillation: just as water heats up and then suddenly disappears, so paint gathers itself together and then suddenly becomes something else—an apparition hovering in the fictive space beyond the picture plane. The boiling point, just before the substance evaporates, is the crucial moment, and it is vexed. When paint is compelling, it is uncanny: it hovers on the brink of impossibility, as if nothing that close to incorporeality could exist. Like the hypnotic red powder of the Stone, paint can reach a pitch of unnaturalness where it seems that it might lose every connection with the tubes and palettes where it began. That is the state that counts, and not the choice between fictive space and
184 WHAT PAINTING IS canvas, or between illusion and paint. It’s not the choice, but the narrowness of the gap: the incredible tension generated by something so infinitesimally near to perfection. Among painters Tintoretto is especially famous for his diaphanous figures, floating ghostlike across vast stretches of luminous dark canvas. They are painted so lightly, so quickly, that they almost disappear, but at the same time Tintoretto painted so loosely, and with such broad strokes, that is never possible to forget that they are merely paint. COLOR PLATE 14 is from a corner of a Tintoretto painting. 18 The looseness of his hand is apparent on the right, where some fabric from another garment meets the lavender robe. Its dark brown stripes do not fold neatly under the lavender, but come up at odd angles. One goes too far, and another doesn’t quite make it. Each one is given a quick spot of Lead White for accent. Behind is an orange Realgar field, now mostly chipped off. The lavender robe itself is a marvel; it reminds me that Tintoretto was named after his father, a dyer of fabrics. It was painted with hanging, curling gestures, not unlike the motion where I lift my hands after washing dishes, and bring them down in the air to shake the water off. The paint comes down from above, rapidly, and then swerves to the left, and it does so repeatedly, each time leaving a thin white veil over the darker Ultramarine. The motions are loose, and they are not aligned to one another. At the center left there is a particularly dense pair of strokes, one above the other. The white paint has been squeezed out to the sides of the brush, making sharp borders. Those marks, in turn, ran over others that did not make the sharp turn, but continued straight down. One is visible where it crosses the shadow below, and another in the shadow at the upper left. They are slightly drier, and so they look more granular where they skip over the weave of the canvas. Both of them continue under the two curving marks. And those granular straight marks lie on top of yet other marks. At the far top left, there is a shadow, a curve of white, and another shadow, parts of the deepest layer that is still visible. One of the granular white strokes begins to cross the shadow at an angle. On the left half of the detail, it is possible to do some sleuthing and find at least these three layers. But Tintoretto is elusive. The central passage is entirely enigmatic. The brushstrokes fall like silk ribbons, one over another with no breaks. Each time the brush passes, it carries a slightly different color: there are hints of
- Page 142 and 143: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 144 and 145: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 146 and 147: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 148 and 149: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 150 and 151: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 152 and 153: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 154 and 155: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 156 and 157: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 158 and 159: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 160 and 161: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 162 and 163: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 164 and 165: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 166 and 167: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 168 and 169: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 170 and 171: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 172 and 173: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 174 and 175: 7 Steplessness IN THE BEGINNING the
- Page 176 and 177: WHAT PAINTING IS 167 just above the
- Page 178 and 179: WHAT PAINTING IS 169 (6) Set the lo
- Page 180 and 181: WHAT PAINTING IS 171 to unify it. O
- Page 182 and 183: WHAT PAINTING IS 173 image from man
- Page 184 and 185: WHAT PAINTING IS 175 others have th
- Page 186 and 187: 8 The beautiful reddish light of th
- Page 188 and 189: THE BEAUTIFUL REDDISH LIGHT OF THE
- Page 190 and 191: THE BEAUTIFUL REDDISH LIGHT OF THE
- Page 194 and 195: THE BEAUTIFUL REDDISH LIGHT OF THE
- Page 196 and 197: 9 Last words IN THE END, what is pa
- Page 198 and 199: WHAT PAINTING IS 189 social nicetie
- Page 200 and 201: WHAT PAINTING IS 191 reason has to
- Page 202 and 203: WHAT PAINTING IS 193 last fifty yea
- Page 204 and 205: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 195 source is Cr
- Page 206 and 207: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 197 1. On this q
- Page 208 and 209: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 199 1655), 90, 1
- Page 210 and 211: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 201 6. The conce
- Page 212 and 213: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 203 “Gnosticis
- Page 214 and 215: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 205 Antimony, tr
- Page 216 and 217: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 207 1. Emmens, A
- Page 218 and 219: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 209 19. Titus Bu
- Page 220 and 221: 35. A theory of pictorial chaos is
- Page 222 and 223: auriferœ, quam chemiam vocant, 3 v
- Page 224 and 225: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 215 until all (o
- Page 226 and 227: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 217 Make an amal
- Page 228 and 229: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 219 the “alreo
- Page 230 and 231: 32. Ibid., 144. 33. For the mixture
- Page 232 and 233: NOTES TO CHAPTER I 223 “Place 8 g
- Page 234 and 235: J.M. Eder, Quellenschriften zu den
- Page 236 and 237: Abstract Expressionism, 89-94, 153
- Page 238 and 239: lapis lazuli; ultramarine; Woad bod
- Page 240 and 241: Duenech, 126-7 Dürer, Albrecht, 17
184 WHAT PAINTING IS<br />
canvas, or between illusion and paint. It’s not the choice, but the<br />
narrowness of the gap: the incredible tension generated by<br />
something so infinitesimally near <strong>to</strong> perfection. Among painters<br />
Tin<strong>to</strong>ret<strong>to</strong> is especially famous for his diaphanous figures,<br />
floating ghostlike across vast stretches of luminous dark canvas.<br />
They are painted so lightly, so quickly, that they almost<br />
disappear, but at the same time Tin<strong>to</strong>ret<strong>to</strong> painted so loosely, and<br />
with such broad strokes, that is never possible <strong>to</strong> forget that they<br />
are merely paint. COLOR PLATE 14 is from a corner of a<br />
Tin<strong>to</strong>ret<strong>to</strong> painting. 18 The looseness of his hand is apparent on<br />
the right, where some fabric from another garment meets the<br />
lavender robe. Its dark brown stripes do not fold neatly under<br />
the lavender, but come up at odd angles. One goes <strong>to</strong>o far, and<br />
another doesn’t quite make it. Each one is given a quick spot of<br />
Lead White for accent. Behind is an orange Realgar field, now<br />
mostly chipped off. The lavender robe itself is a marvel; it<br />
reminds me that Tin<strong>to</strong>ret<strong>to</strong> was named after his father, a dyer of<br />
fabrics. It was painted with hanging, curling gestures, not unlike<br />
the motion where I lift my hands after washing dishes, and bring<br />
them down in the air <strong>to</strong> shake the water off. The paint comes<br />
down from above, rapidly, and then swerves <strong>to</strong> the left, and it<br />
does so repeatedly, each time leaving a thin white veil over the<br />
darker Ultramarine. The motions are loose, and they are not<br />
aligned <strong>to</strong> one another. At the center left there is a particularly<br />
dense pair of strokes, one above the other. The white paint has<br />
been squeezed out <strong>to</strong> the sides of the brush, making sharp<br />
borders. Those marks, in turn, ran over others that did not make<br />
the sharp turn, but continued straight down. One is visible where<br />
it crosses the shadow below, and another in the shadow at the<br />
upper left. They are slightly drier, and so they look more<br />
granular where they skip over the weave of the canvas. Both of<br />
them continue under the two curving marks. And those granular<br />
straight marks lie on <strong>to</strong>p of yet other marks. At the far <strong>to</strong>p left,<br />
there is a shadow, a curve of white, and another shadow, parts of<br />
the deepest layer that is still visible. One of the granular white<br />
strokes begins <strong>to</strong> cross the shadow at an angle.<br />
On the left half of the detail, it is possible <strong>to</strong> do some sleuthing<br />
and find at least these three layers. But Tin<strong>to</strong>ret<strong>to</strong> is elusive. The<br />
central passage is entirely enigmatic. The brushstrokes fall like<br />
silk ribbons, one over another with no breaks. Each time the<br />
brush passes, it carries a slightly different color: there are hints of