23.03.2013 Views

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

172 STEPLESSNESS<br />

that studio instruction only provides hints and strategies.<br />

Perhaps a great painting can happen suddenly, with no planning<br />

or working by stages.<br />

A painting student who follows Doerner or one of the other<br />

man uals soon encounters this dilemma, since any given step is<br />

either trivial (such as “paint a white layer of gesso on the panel”)<br />

or so large as <strong>to</strong> encompass the entirety of skill and experience in<br />

one rule (as in “complete the figures by painting down in<strong>to</strong> the<br />

darks and up in<strong>to</strong> the lights”). Even the supposed glazes and<br />

grisaille underpaintings can be omitted in many cases with no<br />

visible effect. Res<strong>to</strong>rers do not try <strong>to</strong> simulate the layers when<br />

they patch damaged paintings: they just match the overall look<br />

of the paint, and fill it in with a single layer. The thirteen or so<br />

layers in the section of Cima’s painting would be replaced by an<br />

average <strong>to</strong>ne. Many times force of habit, and reverence for the<br />

supposed knowledge of Old Masters, leads his<strong>to</strong>rians <strong>to</strong><br />

postulate layers that have no effect on the eye and may very well<br />

not have existed. In Cima’s painting, other portions might well<br />

be simpler, and still others more complex: there might not have<br />

been a uniform method, applied across the painting or even<br />

across one portion of it.<br />

When painting is effectively done without separate steps—as<br />

virtually all modern painting is, beginning with the<br />

Impressionists—then there is very little that can be said <strong>about</strong> its<br />

method. The unease that many parents feel when their children<br />

set out <strong>to</strong> study art is partly because they sense that there is no<br />

systematic technical instruction in contemporary art schools. In a<br />

large sense, that is correct because there is no longer a succession<br />

of definite kinds of information that must be learned in a certain<br />

order. <strong>Painting</strong> might take years of preparation and experience,<br />

but a truly great painting might also happen in a few minutes of<br />

intense work. Artists first became aware of this around the turn of<br />

the century, and Whistler is the one who made it famous by<br />

proclaiming that his patrons paid for the lifetime of experience<br />

that went in<strong>to</strong> the painting, not the half hour it <strong>to</strong>ok <strong>to</strong> paint it. In<br />

the same vein the German Impressionist Max Liebermann said,<br />

“there is no Technique. There are as many techniques as there are<br />

painters.” 7 In the twentieth century painting is a one-step process<br />

since the “steps” all blend in<strong>to</strong> one another, and there are rarely<br />

more than two or three actually distinct layers that might be<br />

separately described. To paint is <strong>to</strong> work continuously on an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!