What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna
What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna
COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING, REVERBERATING 135 crossed out his failed paintings in chalk, or tore them in pieces: it is hard to destroy what has already been destroyed.) Like painters, alchemists were loath to abandon their work even when it showed no signs of life, and they made a science out of reviving ashes and residue and resurrecting them. At the very end of Ripley’s experiment, the battered dark powder suddenly flares up into unexpected colors, and in the same way, the least promising lump might be the cornerstone for a new method. Very rarely, even the alchemists had to admit they had burned every scrap of life from their samples, and then they called their refuse scoria, recrement, or caput mortuum, Death’s Head. It was sometimes drawn as if it were a modern sign warning against danger , but more often the caput mortuum is a tiny emblematic skull . The vessel becomes its pyre or a coffin, and the substance that is calcined is killed. In alchemical pictures, calcination is a black crow, a raven, a skull, a filthy animal, a mud-soaked man, or a violent murder. 13 From the Death’s Head, nothing more can be done, and the alchemist would discard the remains of the experiment and begin again. As usual there is more here than meets the eye, because the alchemists did not keep clear of the Death’s Head, but sought it out whenever they could. The object was to achieve as thorough a death as possible and still be able to resurrect the ashes, because the result would be something even stronger. One of the few common threads that runs through all alchemical procedures is the requirement that the substance be rotted until it is a black putrescent mass, and then revived until it is golden and pure. This is the alchemical death, Putrefaction or putrefactio. The substance has to be brought to within a single breath of dying, and then revived—or in the typical hyperbole, it has to be killed and resurrected. “Revivification” is the way the alchemists said “resurrection” when they meant substances instead of human souls. The symbol for putrefaction is a spiky elaboration of the letter P, intended perhaps to convey the idea that this is not ordinary rotting or death, but something occult. It was amazing for the alchemists to witness the resurgence of life in something apparently dead. To see a body and a spirit rise from “small Invisible Putrefied Atoms,” an English author remarks, “doth cause a Religious Astonishment.” 14 “Life is wherever substance exists,” writes Frater Albertus, a twentieth-century alchemist who lived in Salt Lake City, “and
136 WHAT PAINTING IS wherever life and substance are, there we find governing mind or consciousness.” 15 Since “all substance is alive—even what which we call dead,” substances must be controlled, metempsychosed, nurtured, laid to rest and resurrected, fused and separated. Healthy substances must be burnt to ashes, scorified, before they can be revivified. Once we can see death in every act of burning, then it becomes possible to see life in every unburned object. Sulfur is alive simply because it glows yellow, because it smells awful, and because it can be scratched. Even a putrefying liquid is alive, because it becomes tumescent, swells, and rises above the water. As the medieval alchemist Artephius says, such water must contain “the body made of two bodies, sol and luna,” and their mating is what causes the fermentation. 16 There is an exceptionally beautiful experiment that shows why every substance is alive: the creation of a silver tree. 17 With the right chemicals, it is possible to grow small “trees” made entirely of silver, and when they are observed through magnifying glasses they reveal a bewildering similarity to actual foliage. They are like real trees, but washed and made brilliant. Their scintillating branches and stalks sway in the water, and their leaves gleam and flash as they catch the light. Anyone who has seen a silver tree must forever doubt that rocks are not alive. Can any parallel to visual art be more immediately persuasive or far-reaching? The substance that artists move around, whether it is clay, bronze, or oil, has to come to life, or mimic life by shining, gleaming, catching the eye and ultimately living on its own. As in alchemy, it is not enough merely to bring life to the inert pigments: the painter also has to toy with death, to bring the paint close to the point of no return in order to make it more convincing in the end. In the alchemical phrase: it is necessary to kill in order to create. Alchemists and artists have a way of ruining what they make and starting over again nearly from scratch. Just as a painter might rub out a figure in order to make a better one, so an alchemist might burn the contents of a vessel down to white char in order to make a better substance out of the ruins of the old one. “Destroy to create” and “kill the father to revive the son” are mottoes of alchemy that apply just as well to visual art. Painting is deeply involved in selfdestruction. Making art is also constantly destroying art, and at times that ongoing destruction can reach such a heartbreaking pitch that a lifetime of work is
- Page 94 and 95: WHAT PAINTING IS 85 FIG. 2 Noah’s
- Page 96 and 97: WHAT PAINTING IS 87 half-light and
- Page 98 and 99: WHAT PAINTING IS 89 he could make,
- Page 100 and 101: WHAT PAINTING IS 91 arm’s length
- Page 102 and 103: WHAT PAINTING IS 93 with the correc
- Page 104 and 105: WHAT PAINTING IS 95 an experienced
- Page 106 and 107: WHAT PAINTING IS 97 tunnel view thr
- Page 108 and 109: WHAT PAINTING IS 99 probably stumbl
- Page 110 and 111: WHAT PAINTING IS 101 (an odd mistak
- Page 112 and 113: WHAT PAINTING IS 103 driest and mos
- Page 114 and 115: all put in a crucible in a darkened
- Page 116 and 117: WHAT PAINTING IS 107 It’s importa
- Page 118 and 119: WHAT PAINTING IS 109 qualities, pri
- Page 120 and 121: WHAT PAINTING IS 111 spoon as it is
- Page 122 and 123: 5 Coagulating, cohobating, macerati
- Page 124 and 125: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 126 and 127: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 128 and 129: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 130 and 131: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 132 and 133: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 134 and 135: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 136 and 137: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 138 and 139: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 140 and 141: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 142 and 143: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 146 and 147: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 148 and 149: COAGULATING, COHOBATING, MACERATING
- Page 150 and 151: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 152 and 153: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 154 and 155: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 156 and 157: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 158 and 159: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 160 and 161: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 162 and 163: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 164 and 165: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 166 and 167: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 168 and 169: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 170 and 171: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 172 and 173: THE STUDIO AS A KIND OF PSYCHOSIS 1
- Page 174 and 175: 7 Steplessness IN THE BEGINNING the
- Page 176 and 177: WHAT PAINTING IS 167 just above the
- Page 178 and 179: WHAT PAINTING IS 169 (6) Set the lo
- Page 180 and 181: WHAT PAINTING IS 171 to unify it. O
- Page 182 and 183: WHAT PAINTING IS 173 image from man
- Page 184 and 185: WHAT PAINTING IS 175 others have th
- Page 186 and 187: 8 The beautiful reddish light of th
- Page 188 and 189: THE BEAUTIFUL REDDISH LIGHT OF THE
- Page 190 and 191: THE BEAUTIFUL REDDISH LIGHT OF THE
- Page 192 and 193: THE BEAUTIFUL REDDISH LIGHT OF THE
136 WHAT PAINTING IS<br />
wherever life and substance are, there we find governing mind<br />
or consciousness.” 15 Since “all substance is alive—even what<br />
which we call dead,” substances must be controlled,<br />
metempsychosed, nurtured, laid <strong>to</strong> rest and resurrected, fused<br />
and separated. Healthy substances must be burnt <strong>to</strong> ashes,<br />
scorified, before they can be revivified. Once we can see death in<br />
every act of burning, then it becomes possible <strong>to</strong> see life in every<br />
unburned object. Sulfur is alive simply because it glows yellow,<br />
because it smells awful, and because it can be scratched. Even a<br />
putrefying liquid is alive, because it becomes tumescent, swells,<br />
and rises above the water. As the medieval alchemist Artephius<br />
says, such water must contain “the body made of two bodies, sol<br />
and luna,” and their mating is what causes the fermentation. 16<br />
There is an exceptionally beautiful experiment that shows why<br />
every substance is alive: the creation of a silver tree. 17 With the<br />
right chemicals, it is possible <strong>to</strong> grow small “trees” made entirely<br />
of silver, and when they are observed through magnifying<br />
glasses they reveal a bewildering similarity <strong>to</strong> actual foliage.<br />
They are like real trees, but washed and made brilliant. Their<br />
scintillating branches and stalks sway in the water, and their<br />
leaves gleam and flash as they catch the light. Anyone who has<br />
seen a silver tree must forever doubt that rocks are not alive.<br />
Can any parallel <strong>to</strong> visual art be more immediately persuasive<br />
or far-reaching? The substance that artists move around, whether<br />
it is clay, bronze, or oil, has <strong>to</strong> come <strong>to</strong> life, or mimic life by<br />
shining, gleaming, catching the eye and ultimately living on its<br />
own. As in alchemy, it is not enough merely <strong>to</strong> bring life <strong>to</strong> the<br />
inert pigments: the painter also has <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>y with death, <strong>to</strong> bring the<br />
paint close <strong>to</strong> the point of no return in order <strong>to</strong> make it more<br />
convincing in the end. In the alchemical phrase: it is necessary <strong>to</strong><br />
kill in order <strong>to</strong> create.<br />
Alchemists and artists have a way of ruining what they make<br />
and starting over again nearly from scratch. Just as a painter<br />
might rub out a figure in order <strong>to</strong> make a better one, so an<br />
alchemist might burn the contents of a vessel down <strong>to</strong> white char<br />
in order <strong>to</strong> make a better substance out of the ruins of the old one.<br />
“Destroy <strong>to</strong> create” and “kill the father <strong>to</strong> revive the son” are<br />
mot<strong>to</strong>es of alchemy that apply just as well <strong>to</strong> visual art. <strong>Painting</strong><br />
is deeply involved in selfdestruction. Making art is also<br />
constantly destroying art, and at times that ongoing destruction<br />
can reach such a heartbreaking pitch that a lifetime of work is