23.03.2013 Views

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116 WHAT PAINTING IS<br />

worked, because their transformations went by slow stages. An<br />

unfinished painting would never look like the final product until<br />

the last moment; it would be deliberately <strong>to</strong>o light, or <strong>to</strong>o warm,<br />

or <strong>to</strong>o green. At the beginning, Sassetta’s painting would have<br />

had a blank where the figures are, and a mat of red clay all<br />

around. The clay, called bole, supports the gold leaf, and takes<br />

the impressions made by the artist’s punches when he decorates<br />

the halos. In this painting, the punches have held up well— one<br />

set serves as decoration in her collar—but the gold is abraded<br />

and the red bole shows through. Clothes would have been done<br />

separately, often in multiple layers <strong>to</strong> build up their density. That<br />

kind of planning has long since vanished. From the<br />

Impressionists onward paint has been allowed <strong>to</strong> transform more<br />

rapidly, and from the Expressionists onward, there have been<br />

virtually no rules or restraints. Now anything is possible, and a<br />

picture might become suddenly beautiful or be ruined in a<br />

moment.<br />

These two possibilities—the slowly worked-out plan, and the<br />

impetuous rush—are different ways of managing<br />

metamorphosis. Conservative painters and teachers mourn the<br />

loss of “real” technique, but the two are just opposite ends of the<br />

same spectrum of transformation. As painters say, the paint seems<br />

<strong>to</strong> have a mind of its own– it “wants” <strong>to</strong> do certain things, and it<br />

“resists” the painter. Some artists have tried <strong>to</strong> discipline paint, <strong>to</strong><br />

learn its inner rules, and <strong>to</strong> control it from a position of<br />

knowledge. Others have learned <strong>to</strong> let paint do what it wants, so<br />

that painting becomes a collaboration between the artist’s desire<br />

and the unpredictable tendencies of the paint. In the first<br />

category belong the majority of premodern painters, the<br />

academicians, conserva<strong>to</strong>rs and chemists, technically-minded<br />

artists, color theorists and chemical engineers. In the second<br />

belong the Expressionists and Neo-Expressionists, and the<br />

majority of contemporary painters. They are agreed on one<br />

principle: painting is metamorphosis. When people say art is<br />

alchemy, they usually mean it involves metamorphoses that can<br />

only be partly unders<strong>to</strong>od. Chemistry can only go so far, and<br />

then intuition, creation, skill, genius, imagination, luck, or some<br />

other intangible has <strong>to</strong> take over. Alchemy is the generic name<br />

for those unaccountable changes: it is whatever happens in the<br />

foggy place where science weakens and gives way <strong>to</strong> ineffable<br />

changes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!