23.03.2013 Views

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

What Painting Is: How to Think about Oil Painting ... - Victoria Vesna

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92 THE MOULDY MATERIA PRIMA<br />

<strong>to</strong> efface the signs of figural elements in his earlier work, and the<br />

artist Frank Stella has said that he still senses draped figures<br />

“underneath” Pollock’s canvases. 34 It’s certainly true that<br />

Pollock’s actions can be explained in that way, but since this is a<br />

book <strong>about</strong> paint, and not representation, I do not want <strong>to</strong> say<br />

more <strong>about</strong> it. <strong>What</strong> matters is what happens in this one tiny<br />

extract from Lavender Mist: even here, in these four or five square<br />

inches, there is an as<strong>to</strong>nishing amount of work, a tremendous<br />

labor devoted <strong>to</strong> making a chaos. The allover paintings are like<br />

battles fought against whatever might unexpectedly produce a<br />

continuous, figural outline. The struggle is clear enough on the<br />

whole canvas, but it is waged just as strongly in marks that are<br />

not much larger than the weave of the canvas (which is also<br />

visible in this detail). This is what Pollock spent his time doing,<br />

working <strong>to</strong> create a convincing and utter disarray.<br />

Yet no chaos is complete. There is no such thing as absolute<br />

absence of structure, or pure randomness: if there were, we<br />

would be unable <strong>to</strong> perceive it at all, because it would have no<br />

form or color <strong>to</strong> understand. 35 Everyday randomness usually<br />

harbors some secret order. The random-dot stereograms that are<br />

popular in books and calendars are actually strongly ordered,<br />

and computers that produce lists of random numbers sometimes<br />

do so by following instructions designed <strong>to</strong> produce the effect of<br />

randomness. Even here, where the destruction is nearly complete,<br />

there are a few marks that still preserve the sense of gesture.<br />

There’s the graceful curve of black at the center, and especially a<br />

tiny white loop that’s nearly lost, just right of the black vertical<br />

that comes up the left third of the painting, a fingerbreadth below<br />

the dark green smudge at its <strong>to</strong>p. It’s tiny, but it is clearly a loop,<br />

and the white strands that fall from either side are clear signs of<br />

the hand that made them: you can picture Pollock’s hand,<br />

making curlicues in the air. It is the beginning of form, the first<br />

step out of chaos.<br />

These s<strong>to</strong>ries <strong>about</strong> the materia prima are only a few out of<br />

many. The place where painting begins, and the moment before<br />

it begins, is almost unreachable by poetry or prose. Alchemy’s<br />

benefit is that it is full of s<strong>to</strong>ries—almost <strong>to</strong>o full, almost<br />

neurotically overstuffed with competing accounts and endless<br />

synonyms. I compared the lists <strong>to</strong> the devil’s many names, but<br />

they are also like a neurotic’s compulsive counting and naming.<br />

In an obvious sense, alchemists were concerned that they begin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!