Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil
Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil
Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Flyndre</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cawdor</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Statement<br />
Section 5 Assessment of Potential Impacts <strong>and</strong> Control Measures<br />
Vessel type<br />
Fuel Use<br />
(te) 1<br />
Emissions (te)<br />
CO2 NOx N2O SO2 CO CH4 VOC<br />
Anchor h<strong>and</strong>ling vessel 3,820 12,224 227 0.84 15.28 60 0.69 7.64<br />
Supply vessel 2,970 2 9504 176 0.65 11.9 46.6 0.53 5.94<br />
St<strong>and</strong>by vessel 162 518 9.6 0.04 0.65 2.5 0.03 0.32<br />
Total 6,950 22,246 412.6 1.53 27.83 109.1 1.25 13.9<br />
1<br />
Total fuel use assuming three <strong>Cawdor</strong> wells.<br />
2<br />
This is assuming the supply vessel is at worst only serving one rig each trip. This tends to be unlikely<br />
<strong>and</strong> therefore represents the worst case.<br />
Note; Atmospheric emissions have been calculated using emissions factors from EEMS Atmospheric<br />
Calculations Issue 1.810a (Austin, 2008)<br />
Table 5‐3 Summary of emissions associated with the drilling support vessels.<br />
Proposed Control Measures<br />
The drilling rig will be subject to audits ensuring compliance with UK legislation.<br />
The impact from emissions will be mitigated by optimising support vessel efficiency.<br />
Low sulphur fuels will be used in accordance with prevailing EU <strong>and</strong> MARPOL requirements.<br />
EMISSIONS TO AIR FROM WELL CLEANUP AND WELL TEST<br />
A screening assessment of the significance of the environmental risk associated with emissions to air<br />
from well clean‐up <strong>and</strong> well test operations was undertaken. The assessment indicated the risk to be<br />
low due to the low volumes of oil <strong>and</strong> gas flared <strong>and</strong> the short duration of activities. However, such<br />
activities may contribute to the greenhouse effect, acid rain <strong>and</strong> local air pollution.<br />
Well clean‐up is necessary to ensure the well no longer contains any drilling <strong>and</strong> completion related<br />
debris (mud, brine, cuttings) which could potentially damage the topsides when completion <strong>and</strong><br />
production begins. A well test flow period may be required to obtain reservoir properties, flow rate<br />
information <strong>and</strong> fluid samples dependent on the information obtained during the drilling of the<br />
reservoir section. Emissions of CO2, CH4 <strong>and</strong> VOCs are higher during clean up <strong>and</strong> well test operations<br />
than similar emissions from rig <strong>and</strong> vessel activities associated with drilling <strong>and</strong> completions.<br />
A maximum of 2,151 tonnes of hydrocarbons (1,450 tonnes of liquids <strong>and</strong> 701 tonnes of gas) will be<br />
flared over no greater than a 24 hr period as part of the clean up <strong>and</strong> well test operations associated<br />
with each well. Assuming that a maximum of 3 production wells are drilled at <strong>Cawdor</strong> this will result<br />
in the flaring of 3,384 te of liquid <strong>and</strong> 1,805 te of gas.<br />
Atmospheric emissions resulting from the well test <strong>and</strong> clean up have been calculated using emissions<br />
factors from the EEMS Atmospheric Calculations Issue 1.10 (Austin, 2008) <strong>and</strong> are presented in Table<br />
5‐4. From Table 5‐4 it is evident that the emissions from the <strong>Cawdor</strong> wells clean up <strong>and</strong> well testing<br />
activities will account for a very small portion (e.g. for CO2 = 0.4%) of the total emissions produced as<br />
a result of well testing in UKCS waters.<br />
D/4114/2011 5 ‐ 3