23.03.2013 Views

Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil

Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil

Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5‐ 2<br />

<strong>Flyndre</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cawdor</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Statement<br />

Section 5 Assessment of Potential Impacts <strong>and</strong> Control Measures<br />

This section covers the assessment of all impacts apart from those associated with accidental releases<br />

of hydrocarbons. Following DECCs latest guidance on oil pollution emergency preparedness issued on<br />

23 rd December 2010 a separate section encompassing hydrocarbon spills, their impacts <strong>and</strong> <strong>Maersk</strong><br />

<strong>Oil</strong>’s response has been provided in Section 6. The hydrocarbon spill scenario covers both an<br />

uncontrolled release of hydrocarbons (well blow out) <strong>and</strong> also the loss of the diesel fuel inventory of<br />

the drilling rig.<br />

5.1. DRILLING PHASE<br />

Section 5.1 deals with the environmental impacts associated with the drilling phase of the <strong>Flyndre</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Cawdor</strong> development <strong>and</strong> the proposed mitigation measures against them.<br />

5.1.1. EMISSIONS<br />

Gaseous emissions contribute to global atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, regional<br />

acid loads <strong>and</strong> in some circumstances low‐level ozone <strong>and</strong> photochemical smog formation. The main<br />

greenhouse gases are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) <strong>and</strong> halogenated<br />

fluorocarbons (the latter are now strictly controlled under the Montreal Protocol).<br />

EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM RIG AND SUPPORT VESSELS<br />

Section 2 discusses the predicted duration of the drilling phase <strong>and</strong> the likely support vessels required<br />

for the development. The predicted atmospheric emissions that will result from this are given in<br />

Table 5‐2. The emissions have been calculated using emission factors from the EEMS Atmospheric<br />

Calculations Issue 1.801a (Austin, 2008) <strong>and</strong> have been presented as a percentage of total emissions<br />

in 2009 from drilling activity in the UKCS.<br />

Fuel<br />

use (te)<br />

Emissions (te)<br />

CO2 NOx N2O SO2 CO CH4 VOC<br />

Drill Rig 2,220 1 7,104 132 0.49 8.88 35 0.40 4.44<br />

2009 total rig emissions 261,928 4,875 18 245 1,288 35 144<br />

Rig emissions during drilling of<br />

<strong>Cawdor</strong> wells as a % of 2009 total<br />

rig emissions<br />

1 Total fuel use assuming three <strong>Cawdor</strong> wells<br />

2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 2.7 1.1 3.1<br />

Table 5‐2 Summary of emissions associated with drilling of the three <strong>Cawdor</strong> wells.<br />

The atmospheric emissions from vessels associated with drilling activities are given in Table 5‐3.<br />

These emissions have been combined with the atmospheric emissions from installation vessels to<br />

allow calculation of cumulative emissions when compared to UK total shipping emissions (Table 5‐5).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!