Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil
Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil
Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Flyndre</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cawdor</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Statement<br />
Section 5 Assessment of Potential Impacts <strong>and</strong> Control Measures<br />
There are not anticipated to be any significant impacts to other marine users as a result of the<br />
proposed <strong>Flyndre</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cawdor</strong> development.<br />
5.4.4. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS<br />
The cumulative impacts assessment has considered three environmental aspects, atmospheric<br />
emissions, underwater noise <strong>and</strong> produced discharges.<br />
The <strong>Flyndre</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cawdor</strong> development will contribute an increase of approximately 2.7% of drilling<br />
emissions when compared to 2009 total rig emissions (Table 5‐2); vessel emissions are expected to be<br />
0.61% of the UK total from shipping emissions when compared to 2008 values (Table 5‐5) <strong>and</strong> well<br />
test emission are 0.4% when compared to 2009 values from the UKCS (Table 5‐4). The generation of<br />
emissions will add to the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere <strong>and</strong> hence marginally contribute to the<br />
effects of global warming. The emissions are not significant when considered in context of emissions<br />
from the UKCS oil <strong>and</strong> gas <strong>and</strong> shipping activities, consequently no significant cumulative impacts are<br />
anticipated.<br />
The impacts of underwater sound have been receiving increased scientific attention, with potential<br />
cumulative impacts raised as a potential cause of concern for acoustically sensitive marine life<br />
(OSPAR, 2009). The construction sounds, principally vessel <strong>and</strong> drill rig movements will contribute to<br />
increasing the local sound levels. There are few practical measures that are possible to minimise the<br />
sound from vessels on a project basis <strong>and</strong> are more appropriately dealt with by international<br />
collaboration within the shipping industry <strong>and</strong> regulatory bodies. The loudest levels of sounds are<br />
expected to arise during the piling activity, the risk to marine life will be reduced by implementing the<br />
JNCC procedures within the piling protocol (Section 5.2.4). The underwater sound levels will be<br />
principally restricted to the drilling <strong>and</strong> construction phases of the development which is temporary<br />
<strong>and</strong> only affect a local area with elevated sound levels, consequently there are not anticipated to be<br />
any significant cumulative or residual impacts as a result of the underwater noise levels.<br />
The produced water from the <strong>Flyndre</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cawdor</strong> field increases as the reservoirs are depleted, the<br />
maximum volume of oil in water is 10.95 tonnes produced in 2026. When these discharges are<br />
compared to the oil in water discharges arising from the UKCS sector it represents an increase of<br />
0.38%. The result of the increases in oil in water as a result of the <strong>Flyndre</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cawdor</strong> development<br />
are not anticipated to result in any adverse cumulative impacts.<br />
5.4.5. TRANSBOUNDARY IMPACTS<br />
The impact assessment determined that there are not anticipated to be any significant transboundary<br />
impacts to countries as are result of planned activities <strong>and</strong> accidental events.<br />
The consideration of transboundary impacts is of relevance as the <strong>Flyndre</strong> field crosses over the<br />
UK/Norwegian median line, with the <strong>Cawdor</strong> field being situated approximately 5 km away from the<br />
line in the UK sector.<br />
The oil spill modelling indicated that in a blow out situation there is a probability of 1‐5% that a<br />
surface sheen of 4µm thickness could be present in the waters of nearby European countries<br />
including Norway, Denmark, Germany <strong>and</strong> Netherl<strong>and</strong>s. There is not anticipated to be any risk of oil<br />
beaching on any neighbouring European countries.<br />
Should a spill be likely to enter into Norwegian waters it will be necessary to implement the NORBRIT<br />
agreement, which outlines procedures to be followed in joint Norwegian / UK spill counter pollution<br />
operations at sea.<br />
D/4114/2011 5 ‐ 23