23.03.2013 Views

Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil

Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil

Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Species<br />

5‐ 22<br />

<strong>Flyndre</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cawdor</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Statement<br />

Section 5 Assessment of Potential Impacts <strong>and</strong> Control Measures<br />

Density (individuals per km 2 ) <strong>and</strong><br />

abundance estimates (Area ‘V’‐ Central<br />

North Sea)*<br />

Number of animals exposed to<br />

sound from piling (total area where<br />

sound is above background levels X<br />

density of animals)<br />

Harbour porpoise<br />

0.294<br />

(47,131 harbour porpoises in area ‘V’)<br />

577<br />

Minke whale<br />

0.028<br />

(4,449 minke whales in area ‘V’)<br />

54<br />

Bottlenose<br />

0.08<br />

Not likely to be exposed coastal<br />

dolphin<br />

(123 bottlenosed dolphins in area ‘V’)<br />

distribution<br />

Lag. species<br />

0.04<br />

(6,460 Lag. Species in Area ‘V’)<br />

78<br />

*See Figure 3‐10 for location of Area ‘V’.<br />

**Lagerorhynchus species are combined due to the difficulty in identifying similar species.<br />

It is worth noting that the numbers provided are approximations e.g. they assume animals will be<br />

distributed evenly throughout Area ‘V’. Therefore they should be considered a rough estimate of the<br />

number of animals potentially exposed (calculations not applicable for bottlenose dolphins – coastal<br />

distribution).<br />

Table 5‐13 Abundance <strong>and</strong> density of marine mammals in the development area <strong>and</strong> approximate<br />

numbers of individuals potentially exposed to piling sounds above the ambient noise level (Table<br />

adapted from SCANS‐II, 2008).<br />

A disturbance offence, as described by the Habitat Regulations, has been interpreted by JNCC as a<br />

type of reaction that can cause a sustained or chronic disruption of behaviour scoring 5 or more in the<br />

Southall et al. (2007) behavioural response severity scale. It is possible that relatively high numbers of<br />

animals, for example 5,777 harbour porpoises, could be exposed to piling sound levels above their<br />

hearing thresholds <strong>and</strong> be audible to them. Beyond the immediate zone of piling operations, the<br />

levels of noise received are not likely to cause sustained or chronic disruption to behaviour. Beyond<br />

the immediate piling area the received sound levels are more likely to induce minor behavioural<br />

responses, for example, it is possible animals could move away to areas of lower sound levels. As the<br />

duration of each piling event spans a relatively short time frame

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!