Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil
Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil
Environmental statement - Flyndre and Cawdor - Maersk Oil
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Species<br />
5‐ 22<br />
<strong>Flyndre</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cawdor</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Statement<br />
Section 5 Assessment of Potential Impacts <strong>and</strong> Control Measures<br />
Density (individuals per km 2 ) <strong>and</strong><br />
abundance estimates (Area ‘V’‐ Central<br />
North Sea)*<br />
Number of animals exposed to<br />
sound from piling (total area where<br />
sound is above background levels X<br />
density of animals)<br />
Harbour porpoise<br />
0.294<br />
(47,131 harbour porpoises in area ‘V’)<br />
577<br />
Minke whale<br />
0.028<br />
(4,449 minke whales in area ‘V’)<br />
54<br />
Bottlenose<br />
0.08<br />
Not likely to be exposed coastal<br />
dolphin<br />
(123 bottlenosed dolphins in area ‘V’)<br />
distribution<br />
Lag. species<br />
0.04<br />
(6,460 Lag. Species in Area ‘V’)<br />
78<br />
*See Figure 3‐10 for location of Area ‘V’.<br />
**Lagerorhynchus species are combined due to the difficulty in identifying similar species.<br />
It is worth noting that the numbers provided are approximations e.g. they assume animals will be<br />
distributed evenly throughout Area ‘V’. Therefore they should be considered a rough estimate of the<br />
number of animals potentially exposed (calculations not applicable for bottlenose dolphins – coastal<br />
distribution).<br />
Table 5‐13 Abundance <strong>and</strong> density of marine mammals in the development area <strong>and</strong> approximate<br />
numbers of individuals potentially exposed to piling sounds above the ambient noise level (Table<br />
adapted from SCANS‐II, 2008).<br />
A disturbance offence, as described by the Habitat Regulations, has been interpreted by JNCC as a<br />
type of reaction that can cause a sustained or chronic disruption of behaviour scoring 5 or more in the<br />
Southall et al. (2007) behavioural response severity scale. It is possible that relatively high numbers of<br />
animals, for example 5,777 harbour porpoises, could be exposed to piling sound levels above their<br />
hearing thresholds <strong>and</strong> be audible to them. Beyond the immediate zone of piling operations, the<br />
levels of noise received are not likely to cause sustained or chronic disruption to behaviour. Beyond<br />
the immediate piling area the received sound levels are more likely to induce minor behavioural<br />
responses, for example, it is possible animals could move away to areas of lower sound levels. As the<br />
duration of each piling event spans a relatively short time frame