23.03.2013 Views

Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...

Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...

Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 4.4 Different orientat<strong>ion</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a Si Crystal. R<strong>and</strong>omly oriented, planar aligned, <strong>and</strong><br />

aligned along the [110] direct<strong>ion</strong>. From (4).<br />

When a crystalline sample is aligned to the beam along a crystallographic<br />

direct<strong>ion</strong>, the open channels are produced <strong>and</strong> the beam “sees” only the surface atoms.<br />

Ions undergo large angle scattering from the first layer atoms but the second <strong>and</strong><br />

subsequent layer atoms in regular lattice posit<strong>ion</strong>s are located within the so called<br />

shadow cone, <strong>and</strong> give rise to no scattering as illustrated in Figure 4.5a). The shadow<br />

cone radius Rc, can be calculated by (4):<br />

1<br />

2 2<br />

⎛ Z1Z<br />

2e<br />

d ⎞<br />

c =<br />

⎜<br />

E ⎟<br />

(4.9)<br />

0<br />

R<br />

⎝ ⎠<br />

where d is the distance between atoms. Ions that enter the channel can undergo small<br />

angle defect<strong>ion</strong>s with the strings <strong>of</strong> atoms as shown in Figure 4.5b). There is a critical<br />

angle for channelling, <strong>and</strong> with 100 keV He + in Si it is ~ 2.5° (1).<br />

When aligned, the scattering yield from deeper atoms is considerably reduced,<br />

by as much as a factor <strong>of</strong> around 100 compared to scattering from a r<strong>and</strong>omly orientated<br />

sample, greatly increasing sensitivity in the near surface reg<strong>ion</strong> (25). Less than 5% <strong>of</strong><br />

the incoming <strong>ion</strong>s will undergo a hard collis<strong>ion</strong>, these <strong>ion</strong>s will be scattered through<br />

large angles with a spread <strong>of</strong> direct<strong>ion</strong>s. The rest <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ion</strong>s will be gently steered into<br />

the open channels, with small angle deflect<strong>ion</strong>s due to interact<strong>ion</strong>s with the channel<br />

walls (1, 5).<br />

If the lattice atoms were stat<strong>ion</strong>ary then the beam would only see 1 atom per<br />

row. Because <strong>of</strong> lattice vibrat<strong>ion</strong>s this is not strictly the case. The lattice vibrat<strong>ion</strong> time<br />

is much <strong>low</strong>er than the transit time <strong>of</strong> an <strong>ion</strong> so the <strong>ion</strong> effectively sees atoms frozen in<br />

their thermally displaced posit<strong>ion</strong>s during its passage (1). The work <strong>of</strong> Stensgaard<br />

shows that effectively 1.3 – 1.4 atoms per row are left visible to the beam, the net effect<br />

is any atom displaced from a regular lattice site by 0.1 – 0.2 Å gives rise to<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!