23.03.2013 Views

Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...

Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...

Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a Si atom will suffer little angular deflect<strong>ion</strong> in a collis<strong>ion</strong> <strong>and</strong> will continue into the<br />

lattice making further collis<strong>ion</strong>s with Si atoms along its path. For heavy <strong>ion</strong>s in the<br />

<strong>energy</strong> range <strong>of</strong> interest, the cascade from a single <strong>ion</strong> will produce a small amorphous<br />

zone.<br />

Considering the behaviour <strong>of</strong> light <strong>ion</strong>s, such as B, the mean <strong>energy</strong> transfer will<br />

be <strong>low</strong>er than with a heavy <strong>ion</strong>. The primary Si recoils produced from light <strong>ion</strong>s will<br />

have on average less <strong>energy</strong> <strong>and</strong> consequently fewer secondary recoils will be produced.<br />

Secondary cascades will be small <strong>and</strong> may consist <strong>of</strong> only a few displaced atoms. For a<br />

light <strong>ion</strong>, the collis<strong>ion</strong> cross sect<strong>ion</strong> σ is much <strong>low</strong>er. From equat<strong>ion</strong>s 3.1 (<strong>and</strong> 2.6) it is<br />

obvious that the mean free path between collis<strong>ion</strong>s is much greater with a light <strong>ion</strong> than<br />

a heavy <strong>ion</strong>. This results in a much <strong>low</strong>er <strong>energy</strong> deposit<strong>ion</strong> density for light <strong>ion</strong>s. As<br />

the small cascades will be created much further apart they will not overlap, so<br />

amorphous zones will not be produced (18). As a light <strong>ion</strong> travels a substantially greater<br />

distance between collis<strong>ion</strong>s a higher proport<strong>ion</strong> <strong>of</strong> its <strong>energy</strong> will be lost inelastically,<br />

than with heavy <strong>ion</strong>s. However this effect is less important at the <strong>low</strong> energies <strong>of</strong><br />

interest where electronic stopping is <strong>low</strong>. A light <strong>ion</strong> has more likelihood <strong>of</strong> being<br />

deflected through large angles than heavy <strong>ion</strong>s <strong>and</strong> so it will tend to take a zigzag<br />

pathway. The overall effect is that small pockets <strong>of</strong> damage are formed at locat<strong>ion</strong>s<br />

along the path as shown schematically in Figure 3.5b). A single implanted light <strong>ion</strong> will<br />

not produce an amorphous zone.<br />

In summary the distribut<strong>ion</strong> <strong>of</strong> displacements around an <strong>ion</strong> track depends<br />

strongly on the <strong>ion</strong> mass. Heavy <strong>ion</strong>s have a much higher <strong>energy</strong> deposit<strong>ion</strong> density<br />

resulting in small amorphous zones. A light <strong>ion</strong> has a much <strong>low</strong>er <strong>energy</strong> deposit<strong>ion</strong><br />

density resulting in damage which is sparse <strong>and</strong> created in pockets along a zigzag <strong>ion</strong><br />

path. Important models <strong>of</strong> how these damage distribut<strong>ion</strong>s produce a continuous<br />

amorphous layer are described in the fol<strong>low</strong>ing sect<strong>ion</strong>s. The models are described with<br />

reference to the type <strong>of</strong> <strong>ion</strong> which is most appropriate.<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!