Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...
Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ... Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...
energy Ed causing the target atom to be displaced. Any energy transferred exceeding Ed becomes the resulting kinetic energy of this so-called primary recoil atom, which moves away from the ion track into the lattice. Primary recoil atoms with sufficient energy are able to displace further atoms, producing secondary recoil atoms, which in turn can create higher order recoils. This process continues, creating a collision cascade. The ion will continue travelling through the material, creating more primary recoil atoms along its path until all its energy is dissipated. The energy deposition density is much higher for heavy ions compared to light ones. This difference results in the damage build up proceeding in a very different fashion for heavy and light ions, and is a critical factor for amorphous zone and layer formation. In this section the collision cascades of heavy ions are first described, followed by light ions, highlighting the differences. Different models for amorphisation, i.e. heterogeneous and homogeneous amorphisation, appropriate for heavy and light ions respectively, are described in the following sections, along with a brief summary of other relevant models and damage effects. The amount of energy transferred in a collision is impact parameter dependent, with maximum transfer for a head on collision, and decreasing with increasing impact parameter. The average energy transfer is dependent on the scattering cross section (18). Heavy ions, with a larger scattering cross section are more likely to undergo collisions, and the average energy transfer is therefore higher for heavy ions (18). The mean free path for an energetic particle between collisions λd is given by λ 1 d = (3.1) Nσ where N is the atomic lattice density and σ is the scattering cross section, given in equation 2.6. Since σ is proportional to Z1 2 it follows that the mean free path for a heavy ion is much shorter than for a light ion. It is in fact of the order of an interatomic spacing. A heavy ion therefore generates another displacement almost immediately after the first, causing the energy deposition density to be much higher for heavy ions than with light ones. Since primary recoils are created close together along the ion track, the individual cascades tend to overlap with their neighbours and the final result would be a giant collision cascade containing all the overlapping individual cascades. As the ion energy decreases along its path, its scattering cross section increases causing collisions closer together. The rate of energy deposition increases along the ion path, until towards the end of the ion path where the ion energy is low and correspondingly the total energy transferred to recoils is also low. The resulting collision cascade is therefore ellipsoidal in shape (18), as shown schematically in Figure 3.5 a). A heavy ion, such as As, hitting 37
a Si atom will suffer little angular deflection in a collision and will continue into the lattice making further collisions with Si atoms along its path. For heavy ions in the energy range of interest, the cascade from a single ion will produce a small amorphous zone. Considering the behaviour of light ions, such as B, the mean energy transfer will be lower than with a heavy ion. The primary Si recoils produced from light ions will have on average less energy and consequently fewer secondary recoils will be produced. Secondary cascades will be small and may consist of only a few displaced atoms. For a light ion, the collision cross section σ is much lower. From equations 3.1 (and 2.6) it is obvious that the mean free path between collisions is much greater with a light ion than a heavy ion. This results in a much lower energy deposition density for light ions. As the small cascades will be created much further apart they will not overlap, so amorphous zones will not be produced (18). As a light ion travels a substantially greater distance between collisions a higher proportion of its energy will be lost inelastically, than with heavy ions. However this effect is less important at the low energies of interest where electronic stopping is low. A light ion has more likelihood of being deflected through large angles than heavy ions and so it will tend to take a zigzag pathway. The overall effect is that small pockets of damage are formed at locations along the path as shown schematically in Figure 3.5b). A single implanted light ion will not produce an amorphous zone. In summary the distribution of displacements around an ion track depends strongly on the ion mass. Heavy ions have a much higher energy deposition density resulting in small amorphous zones. A light ion has a much lower energy deposition density resulting in damage which is sparse and created in pockets along a zigzag ion path. Important models of how these damage distributions produce a continuous amorphous layer are described in the following sections. The models are described with reference to the type of ion which is most appropriate. 38
- Page 5 and 6: Chapter 7 Interaction between Xe, F
- Page 7 and 8: List of Figures Figure 1.1 a) Schem
- Page 9 and 10: Figure 4.13 Variation in the kinema
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 6.10 MEIS energy spectra for
- Page 13 and 14: Figure 7.8 Combined MEIS Xe depth p
- Page 15 and 16: Abbreviations and Symbols a/c amorp
- Page 17 and 18: Abstract The work described in this
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 7 5 M. Werner, J.A. van den
- Page 21 and 22: terminal (Vg), current cannot flow
- Page 23 and 24: This is an approximate average leve
- Page 25 and 26: the active channel, adjacent to the
- Page 27 and 28: To continue to improve devices ther
- Page 29 and 30: produces a device quality regrown l
- Page 31 and 32: technique of channelling Rutherford
- Page 33 and 34: 22 J.S Williams. Solid Phase Recrys
- Page 35 and 36: and the probability of scattering t
- Page 37 and 38: importance for many atomic collisio
- Page 39 and 40: M1, V0, E0 Figure 2.2 Elastic scatt
- Page 41 and 42: 2.3.1 Models for inelastic energy l
- Page 43 and 44: dE/dx (ev/Ang) 10 1 Inelastic Energ
- Page 45 and 46: dE/dx (eV/Ang) 125 100 75 50 25 0 2
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 2.5 Results of TRIM simulati
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 3 Damage and Annealing proc
- Page 51 and 52: the Si/SiO2 interface, consuming th
- Page 53 and 54: On the basis that by creating an in
- Page 55: Figure 3.4 Structure of crystalline
- Page 59 and 60: 3.2.2.5 Homogeneous model (Critical
- Page 61 and 62: Sputtering and atomic mixing play a
- Page 63 and 64: and is approximately 25 times faste
- Page 65 and 66: elevant dopants later. For equal co
- Page 67 and 68: nearest neighbour distance (52). By
- Page 69 and 70: Category I defects are produced whe
- Page 71 and 72: thermal annealing (600 - 700 °C an
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 3.11 Relationship between im
- Page 75 and 76: defect pairs due to Coulomb attract
- Page 77 and 78: ⎛ 〈 C ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ I 〉 〈 C V
- Page 79 and 80: 27 R.D. Goldberg, J. S. Williams, a
- Page 81 and 82: 67 H. Bracht. Diffusion Mechanism a
- Page 83 and 84: Hall effect measurements were carri
- Page 85 and 86: energy than one scattered from an a
- Page 87 and 88: epresents a small improvement over
- Page 89 and 90: (dE/dx)out multiplied by the path l
- Page 91 and 92: they are small compared to the diff
- Page 93 and 94: ackscattering (27). This fact forms
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 4.7 a) Plot of a Gaussian di
- Page 97 and 98: similar to the width of the error f
- Page 99 and 100: UP Ion Beam SPIN Rotation Sample Sc
- Page 101 and 102: Kinematic factor (K) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 4.14 Illustration of the dou
- Page 105 and 106: 4.2.2.4 Interpretation of spectra A
<strong>energy</strong> Ed causing the target atom to be displaced. Any <strong>energy</strong> transferred exceeding Ed<br />
becomes the resulting kinetic <strong>energy</strong> <strong>of</strong> this so-called primary recoil atom, which moves<br />
away from the <strong>ion</strong> track into the lattice. Primary recoil atoms with sufficient <strong>energy</strong> are<br />
able to displace further atoms, producing secondary recoil atoms, which in turn can<br />
create higher order recoils. This process continues, creating a collis<strong>ion</strong> cascade. The <strong>ion</strong><br />
will continue travelling through the material, creating more primary recoil atoms along<br />
its path until all its <strong>energy</strong> is dissipated.<br />
The <strong>energy</strong> deposit<strong>ion</strong> density is much higher for heavy <strong>ion</strong>s compared to light<br />
ones. This difference results in the damage build up proceeding in a very different<br />
fash<strong>ion</strong> for heavy <strong>and</strong> light <strong>ion</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> is a critical factor for amorphous zone <strong>and</strong> layer<br />
<strong>format<strong>ion</strong></strong>. In this sect<strong>ion</strong> the collis<strong>ion</strong> cascades <strong>of</strong> heavy <strong>ion</strong>s are first described,<br />
fol<strong>low</strong>ed by light <strong>ion</strong>s, highlighting the differences. Different models for amorphisat<strong>ion</strong>,<br />
i.e. heterogeneous <strong>and</strong> homogeneous amorphisat<strong>ion</strong>, appropriate for heavy <strong>and</strong> light<br />
<strong>ion</strong>s respectively, are described in the fol<strong>low</strong>ing sect<strong>ion</strong>s, along with a brief summary <strong>of</strong><br />
other relevant models <strong>and</strong> damage effects.<br />
The amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>energy</strong> transferred in a collis<strong>ion</strong> is impact parameter dependent,<br />
with maximum transfer for a head on collis<strong>ion</strong>, <strong>and</strong> decreasing with increasing impact<br />
parameter. The average <strong>energy</strong> transfer is dependent on the scattering cross sect<strong>ion</strong> (18).<br />
Heavy <strong>ion</strong>s, with a larger scattering cross sect<strong>ion</strong> are more likely to undergo collis<strong>ion</strong>s,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the average <strong>energy</strong> transfer is therefore higher for heavy <strong>ion</strong>s (18). The mean free<br />
path for an energetic particle between collis<strong>ion</strong>s λd is given by<br />
λ 1<br />
d = (3.1)<br />
Nσ<br />
where N is the atomic lattice density <strong>and</strong> σ is the scattering cross sect<strong>ion</strong>, given in<br />
equat<strong>ion</strong> 2.6. Since σ is proport<strong>ion</strong>al to Z1 2 it fol<strong>low</strong>s that the mean free path for a heavy<br />
<strong>ion</strong> is much shorter than for a light <strong>ion</strong>. It is in fact <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> an interatomic<br />
spacing. A heavy <strong>ion</strong> therefore generates another displacement almost immediately after<br />
the first, causing the <strong>energy</strong> deposit<strong>ion</strong> density to be much higher for heavy <strong>ion</strong>s than<br />
with light ones. Since primary recoils are created close together along the <strong>ion</strong> track, the<br />
individual cascades tend to overlap with their neighbours <strong>and</strong> the final result would be a<br />
giant collis<strong>ion</strong> cascade containing all the overlapping individual cascades. As the <strong>ion</strong><br />
<strong>energy</strong> decreases along its path, its scattering cross sect<strong>ion</strong> increases causing collis<strong>ion</strong>s<br />
closer together. The rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>energy</strong> deposit<strong>ion</strong> increases along the <strong>ion</strong> path, until towards<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ion</strong> path where the <strong>ion</strong> <strong>energy</strong> is <strong>low</strong> <strong>and</strong> correspondingly the total <strong>energy</strong><br />
transferred to recoils is also <strong>low</strong>. The resulting collis<strong>ion</strong> cascade is therefore ellipsoidal<br />
in shape (18), as shown schematically in Figure 3.5 a). A heavy <strong>ion</strong>, such as As, hitting<br />
37