Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...

Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ... Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...

usir.salford.ac.uk
from usir.salford.ac.uk More from this publisher
23.03.2013 Views

energy Ed causing the target atom to be displaced. Any energy transferred exceeding Ed becomes the resulting kinetic energy of this so-called primary recoil atom, which moves away from the ion track into the lattice. Primary recoil atoms with sufficient energy are able to displace further atoms, producing secondary recoil atoms, which in turn can create higher order recoils. This process continues, creating a collision cascade. The ion will continue travelling through the material, creating more primary recoil atoms along its path until all its energy is dissipated. The energy deposition density is much higher for heavy ions compared to light ones. This difference results in the damage build up proceeding in a very different fashion for heavy and light ions, and is a critical factor for amorphous zone and layer formation. In this section the collision cascades of heavy ions are first described, followed by light ions, highlighting the differences. Different models for amorphisation, i.e. heterogeneous and homogeneous amorphisation, appropriate for heavy and light ions respectively, are described in the following sections, along with a brief summary of other relevant models and damage effects. The amount of energy transferred in a collision is impact parameter dependent, with maximum transfer for a head on collision, and decreasing with increasing impact parameter. The average energy transfer is dependent on the scattering cross section (18). Heavy ions, with a larger scattering cross section are more likely to undergo collisions, and the average energy transfer is therefore higher for heavy ions (18). The mean free path for an energetic particle between collisions λd is given by λ 1 d = (3.1) Nσ where N is the atomic lattice density and σ is the scattering cross section, given in equation 2.6. Since σ is proportional to Z1 2 it follows that the mean free path for a heavy ion is much shorter than for a light ion. It is in fact of the order of an interatomic spacing. A heavy ion therefore generates another displacement almost immediately after the first, causing the energy deposition density to be much higher for heavy ions than with light ones. Since primary recoils are created close together along the ion track, the individual cascades tend to overlap with their neighbours and the final result would be a giant collision cascade containing all the overlapping individual cascades. As the ion energy decreases along its path, its scattering cross section increases causing collisions closer together. The rate of energy deposition increases along the ion path, until towards the end of the ion path where the ion energy is low and correspondingly the total energy transferred to recoils is also low. The resulting collision cascade is therefore ellipsoidal in shape (18), as shown schematically in Figure 3.5 a). A heavy ion, such as As, hitting 37

a Si atom will suffer little angular deflection in a collision and will continue into the lattice making further collisions with Si atoms along its path. For heavy ions in the energy range of interest, the cascade from a single ion will produce a small amorphous zone. Considering the behaviour of light ions, such as B, the mean energy transfer will be lower than with a heavy ion. The primary Si recoils produced from light ions will have on average less energy and consequently fewer secondary recoils will be produced. Secondary cascades will be small and may consist of only a few displaced atoms. For a light ion, the collision cross section σ is much lower. From equations 3.1 (and 2.6) it is obvious that the mean free path between collisions is much greater with a light ion than a heavy ion. This results in a much lower energy deposition density for light ions. As the small cascades will be created much further apart they will not overlap, so amorphous zones will not be produced (18). As a light ion travels a substantially greater distance between collisions a higher proportion of its energy will be lost inelastically, than with heavy ions. However this effect is less important at the low energies of interest where electronic stopping is low. A light ion has more likelihood of being deflected through large angles than heavy ions and so it will tend to take a zigzag pathway. The overall effect is that small pockets of damage are formed at locations along the path as shown schematically in Figure 3.5b). A single implanted light ion will not produce an amorphous zone. In summary the distribution of displacements around an ion track depends strongly on the ion mass. Heavy ions have a much higher energy deposition density resulting in small amorphous zones. A light ion has a much lower energy deposition density resulting in damage which is sparse and created in pockets along a zigzag ion path. Important models of how these damage distributions produce a continuous amorphous layer are described in the following sections. The models are described with reference to the type of ion which is most appropriate. 38

<strong>energy</strong> Ed causing the target atom to be displaced. Any <strong>energy</strong> transferred exceeding Ed<br />

becomes the resulting kinetic <strong>energy</strong> <strong>of</strong> this so-called primary recoil atom, which moves<br />

away from the <strong>ion</strong> track into the lattice. Primary recoil atoms with sufficient <strong>energy</strong> are<br />

able to displace further atoms, producing secondary recoil atoms, which in turn can<br />

create higher order recoils. This process continues, creating a collis<strong>ion</strong> cascade. The <strong>ion</strong><br />

will continue travelling through the material, creating more primary recoil atoms along<br />

its path until all its <strong>energy</strong> is dissipated.<br />

The <strong>energy</strong> deposit<strong>ion</strong> density is much higher for heavy <strong>ion</strong>s compared to light<br />

ones. This difference results in the damage build up proceeding in a very different<br />

fash<strong>ion</strong> for heavy <strong>and</strong> light <strong>ion</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> is a critical factor for amorphous zone <strong>and</strong> layer<br />

<strong>format<strong>ion</strong></strong>. In this sect<strong>ion</strong> the collis<strong>ion</strong> cascades <strong>of</strong> heavy <strong>ion</strong>s are first described,<br />

fol<strong>low</strong>ed by light <strong>ion</strong>s, highlighting the differences. Different models for amorphisat<strong>ion</strong>,<br />

i.e. heterogeneous <strong>and</strong> homogeneous amorphisat<strong>ion</strong>, appropriate for heavy <strong>and</strong> light<br />

<strong>ion</strong>s respectively, are described in the fol<strong>low</strong>ing sect<strong>ion</strong>s, along with a brief summary <strong>of</strong><br />

other relevant models <strong>and</strong> damage effects.<br />

The amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>energy</strong> transferred in a collis<strong>ion</strong> is impact parameter dependent,<br />

with maximum transfer for a head on collis<strong>ion</strong>, <strong>and</strong> decreasing with increasing impact<br />

parameter. The average <strong>energy</strong> transfer is dependent on the scattering cross sect<strong>ion</strong> (18).<br />

Heavy <strong>ion</strong>s, with a larger scattering cross sect<strong>ion</strong> are more likely to undergo collis<strong>ion</strong>s,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the average <strong>energy</strong> transfer is therefore higher for heavy <strong>ion</strong>s (18). The mean free<br />

path for an energetic particle between collis<strong>ion</strong>s λd is given by<br />

λ 1<br />

d = (3.1)<br />

Nσ<br />

where N is the atomic lattice density <strong>and</strong> σ is the scattering cross sect<strong>ion</strong>, given in<br />

equat<strong>ion</strong> 2.6. Since σ is proport<strong>ion</strong>al to Z1 2 it fol<strong>low</strong>s that the mean free path for a heavy<br />

<strong>ion</strong> is much shorter than for a light <strong>ion</strong>. It is in fact <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> an interatomic<br />

spacing. A heavy <strong>ion</strong> therefore generates another displacement almost immediately after<br />

the first, causing the <strong>energy</strong> deposit<strong>ion</strong> density to be much higher for heavy <strong>ion</strong>s than<br />

with light ones. Since primary recoils are created close together along the <strong>ion</strong> track, the<br />

individual cascades tend to overlap with their neighbours <strong>and</strong> the final result would be a<br />

giant collis<strong>ion</strong> cascade containing all the overlapping individual cascades. As the <strong>ion</strong><br />

<strong>energy</strong> decreases along its path, its scattering cross sect<strong>ion</strong> increases causing collis<strong>ion</strong>s<br />

closer together. The rate <strong>of</strong> <strong>energy</strong> deposit<strong>ion</strong> increases along the <strong>ion</strong> path, until towards<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ion</strong> path where the <strong>ion</strong> <strong>energy</strong> is <strong>low</strong> <strong>and</strong> correspondingly the total <strong>energy</strong><br />

transferred to recoils is also <strong>low</strong>. The resulting collis<strong>ion</strong> cascade is therefore ellipsoidal<br />

in shape (18), as shown schematically in Figure 3.5 a). A heavy <strong>ion</strong>, such as As, hitting<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!