Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...
Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ... Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...
3.2.1.4 Dynamic annealing A specific consequence of the migration of vacancies and interstitials is that damage can be removed by the annihilation of vacancies and interstitials during the collision cascade caused by implantation. This process is called dynamic annealing and the rate is dependant upon implant parameters, principally the rate of defect generation and the substrate temperature. An increased defect migration at higher implantation temperatures causes correspondingly higher levels of defect annihilation. A high implant temperature could stop amorphous layers forming depending on the implant species and fluence. (See section 3.3 for a description of the amorphisation process.) If however implantation is carried out at liquid nitrogen temperatures the majority of defects will be frozen in. It is worth mentioning there is a careful balance of effects occurring within implantation to the extent that under certain conditions it is possible to re – crystallise amorphous layers by ion implantation (14-16) in a process called ion beam induced epitaxial crystallisation, through the energy supplied in the implantation. There is a delicate balance between crystallisation and the damage formation (14). 3.2.2 Amorphisation 3.2.2.1 Structure of amorphous Si Amorphous Si differs from crystalline Si by having no long range order or periodicity. It can be described as having a frozen liquid structure or as a continuous random network of Si atoms. Generally each Si atom is four fold coordinated bonded to four other Si atoms but with large average distortion of bond angles and lengths that incorporate 5 and 7 ring structures as well as the 6 ring structure for the crystalline, as shown in Figure 3.4. Additionally amorphous Si has been found to contain defects without four fold coordination, such as dangling bonds and vacancy type defects (4). 35
Figure 3.4 Structure of crystalline Si (left) showing the 6 ring structure and amorphous Si (right) where the 5 and 7 ring structure is visible. From (4) 3.2.2.2 Ion implantation amorphisation Ion implantation of Si can produce amorphous Si layers or a damaged but essentially still crystalline structure depending on implantation conditions (4). For transistor device production there are distinct advantages for using implants that amorphise the Si therefore the focus of this thesis is on amorphising implants. The reasons for amorphising the Si will be discussed in some detail throughout this thesis but as a brief summary the main reasons are the production of higher quality defect free regrown layers compared to the regrowth of highly damaged layers. The junction depth can be spatially separated from the end of range, and channelling of the ions can be suppressed. The experiments carried out in this thesis on the whole use amorphised Si or are concerned with the formation of a continuous amorphous layer. Amorphous Si layers can also be produced by deposition, e.g. chemical vapour deposition (CVD) or using low energy ion beams. However deposited amorphous Si layers are less well characterised and with less reproducible characteristics than ion implanted amorphous Si (17). 3.2.2.3 Collision Cascades, produced by single heavy and light ions When an ion is implanted into Si it will probably undergo a hard collision with an atom near the surface. Energy will be transferred in the collision as described in chapter 2 (18). It is likely that the energy transferred will exceed the displacement 36
- Page 3 and 4: 3.2.2.6 Other models 40 3.2.3 Other
- Page 5 and 6: Chapter 7 Interaction between Xe, F
- Page 7 and 8: List of Figures Figure 1.1 a) Schem
- Page 9 and 10: Figure 4.13 Variation in the kinema
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 6.10 MEIS energy spectra for
- Page 13 and 14: Figure 7.8 Combined MEIS Xe depth p
- Page 15 and 16: Abbreviations and Symbols a/c amorp
- Page 17 and 18: Abstract The work described in this
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 7 5 M. Werner, J.A. van den
- Page 21 and 22: terminal (Vg), current cannot flow
- Page 23 and 24: This is an approximate average leve
- Page 25 and 26: the active channel, adjacent to the
- Page 27 and 28: To continue to improve devices ther
- Page 29 and 30: produces a device quality regrown l
- Page 31 and 32: technique of channelling Rutherford
- Page 33 and 34: 22 J.S Williams. Solid Phase Recrys
- Page 35 and 36: and the probability of scattering t
- Page 37 and 38: importance for many atomic collisio
- Page 39 and 40: M1, V0, E0 Figure 2.2 Elastic scatt
- Page 41 and 42: 2.3.1 Models for inelastic energy l
- Page 43 and 44: dE/dx (ev/Ang) 10 1 Inelastic Energ
- Page 45 and 46: dE/dx (eV/Ang) 125 100 75 50 25 0 2
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 2.5 Results of TRIM simulati
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 3 Damage and Annealing proc
- Page 51 and 52: the Si/SiO2 interface, consuming th
- Page 53: On the basis that by creating an in
- Page 57 and 58: a Si atom will suffer little angula
- Page 59 and 60: 3.2.2.5 Homogeneous model (Critical
- Page 61 and 62: Sputtering and atomic mixing play a
- Page 63 and 64: and is approximately 25 times faste
- Page 65 and 66: elevant dopants later. For equal co
- Page 67 and 68: nearest neighbour distance (52). By
- Page 69 and 70: Category I defects are produced whe
- Page 71 and 72: thermal annealing (600 - 700 °C an
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 3.11 Relationship between im
- Page 75 and 76: defect pairs due to Coulomb attract
- Page 77 and 78: ⎛ 〈 C ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ I 〉 〈 C V
- Page 79 and 80: 27 R.D. Goldberg, J. S. Williams, a
- Page 81 and 82: 67 H. Bracht. Diffusion Mechanism a
- Page 83 and 84: Hall effect measurements were carri
- Page 85 and 86: energy than one scattered from an a
- Page 87 and 88: epresents a small improvement over
- Page 89 and 90: (dE/dx)out multiplied by the path l
- Page 91 and 92: they are small compared to the diff
- Page 93 and 94: ackscattering (27). This fact forms
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 4.7 a) Plot of a Gaussian di
- Page 97 and 98: similar to the width of the error f
- Page 99 and 100: UP Ion Beam SPIN Rotation Sample Sc
- Page 101 and 102: Kinematic factor (K) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 4.14 Illustration of the dou
3.2.1.4 Dynamic <strong>annealing</strong><br />
A specific consequence <strong>of</strong> the migrat<strong>ion</strong> <strong>of</strong> vacancies <strong>and</strong> interstitials is that<br />
damage can be removed by the annihilat<strong>ion</strong> <strong>of</strong> vacancies <strong>and</strong> interstitials during the<br />
collis<strong>ion</strong> cascade caused by implantat<strong>ion</strong>. This process is called dynamic <strong>annealing</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
the rate is dependant upon implant parameters, principally the rate <strong>of</strong> defect generat<strong>ion</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> the substrate temperature. An increased defect migrat<strong>ion</strong> at higher implantat<strong>ion</strong><br />
temperatures causes correspondingly higher levels <strong>of</strong> defect annihilat<strong>ion</strong>. A high<br />
implant temperature could stop amorphous layers forming depending on the implant<br />
species <strong>and</strong> fluence. (See sect<strong>ion</strong> 3.3 for a descript<strong>ion</strong> <strong>of</strong> the amorphisat<strong>ion</strong> process.) If<br />
however implantat<strong>ion</strong> is carried out at liquid nitrogen temperatures the majority <strong>of</strong><br />
defects will be frozen in. It is worth ment<strong>ion</strong>ing there is a careful balance <strong>of</strong> effects<br />
occurring within implantat<strong>ion</strong> to the extent that under certain condit<strong>ion</strong>s it is possible to<br />
re – crystallise amorphous layers by <strong>ion</strong> implantat<strong>ion</strong> (14-16) in a process called <strong>ion</strong><br />
beam induced epitaxial crystallisat<strong>ion</strong>, through the <strong>energy</strong> supplied in the implantat<strong>ion</strong>.<br />
There is a delicate balance between crystallisat<strong>ion</strong> <strong>and</strong> the damage <strong>format<strong>ion</strong></strong> (14).<br />
3.2.2 Amorphisat<strong>ion</strong><br />
3.2.2.1 Structure <strong>of</strong> amorphous Si<br />
Amorphous Si differs from crystalline Si by having no long range order or<br />
periodicity. It can be described as having a frozen liquid structure or as a continuous<br />
r<strong>and</strong>om network <strong>of</strong> Si atoms. Generally each Si atom is four fold coordinated bonded to<br />
four other Si atoms but with large average distort<strong>ion</strong> <strong>of</strong> bond angles <strong>and</strong> lengths that<br />
incorporate 5 <strong>and</strong> 7 ring structures as well as the 6 ring structure for the crystalline, as<br />
shown in Figure 3.4. Addit<strong>ion</strong>ally amorphous Si has been found to contain defects<br />
without four fold coordinat<strong>ion</strong>, such as dangling bonds <strong>and</strong> vacancy type defects (4).<br />
35