4 J.A. van den Berg, D. G. Armour, M. Werner, S. Whelan, W. V<strong>and</strong>ervorst, T. Clarysse, E. H. J. Collart, R. D. Goldberg, P Bailey, T. C. Q. Noakes. Proc Int Conf. on Ion Implantat<strong>ion</strong> Technology (ITT 2002), (Sept 2002), IEEE Operat<strong>ion</strong>s Center, Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331. p. 597 (2003) 5 J.A. van den Berg, D Armour, S Zhang, S Whelan, M Werner, E.H.J. Collart, R.D. Goldberg, P. Bailey, T.C.Q. Noakes. P303 – 308. Materials Research Society proceeding (MRS) vol 717, Si front end junct<strong>ion</strong> <strong>format<strong>ion</strong></strong> technologies, San Francisco Ca April 2 – 4 2002. Published MRS, Pennsylvania, USA. 6 P.Pichler, Solid Phase Epitaxy. Unpublished. 7 Solid phase recrystallizat<strong>ion</strong> processes in silicon,in Surface modificat<strong>ion</strong> <strong>and</strong> alloying by laser, <strong>ion</strong> <strong>and</strong> electron beams, J. S. Williams, J. M. Poate, G. Foti <strong>and</strong> D. C. Jacobson, Eds. Plenum, 1983, p. 133-163. 8 J. Dabrowski, H.-J. Mussig, V. Zavodinsky, R. Baierle <strong>and</strong>, M. J. Caldas, Phys. Rev. B, 65, 245305 (2002) 9 Private communicat<strong>ion</strong>. P.Pichler. 10 R. Kasnavi, Y. Sun, P. Pianetta, P.G. Griffin, J.D. Plummer. J. Appl. Phys. 87, 2000, p 2255–2260. 11 P. M. Rousseau, P. B. Griffin, W. T. Fang <strong>and</strong> J D Plummer. J. Appl. Phys. 84, 1998. p. 3593-3601 12 J. A. van den Berg, S. Zhang, S. Whelan, D.G. Armour, R.D. Goldberg, P.Bailey, T.C.Q. Noakes. Nucl. Instr. Methods B. 183 (2001) 154-165. 13 Private communicat<strong>ion</strong>. T. Feudal, AMD. 14 M. Werner, J. A. van den Berg, D. G. Armour, W. V<strong>and</strong>ervorst, E. H. J. Collart, R. D. Goldberg, P. Bailey, T. C. Q. Noakes. Nucl. Instr. And Meth B 216 (2004) 67. 15 A H Al-Bayati, K Ormannn- Rossiter, J A van den Berg <strong>and</strong> D G Armour, Surface Sci 241 (1991) 91. 16 http://www.esrf.fr/UsersAndScience/Experiments/SurfaceScience/ID01/ (accessed 12/1/06). 17 U. Pietsch, V. Holý, T. Baumbach, High-Resolut<strong>ion</strong> X-ray Scattering from Thin Films <strong>and</strong> Lateral Nanostructures, (Spinger, Berlin, 2004). 18 L. Capello, T.H. Metzger, M. Werner, J.A. van den Berg, M. Servidori, M. Herden, T. Feudel. Mat. Sci. <strong>and</strong> Eng. B 124-125 (2005) 200 – 204. 19 L. Capello, PhD thesis. Structural investigat<strong>ion</strong> <strong>of</strong> silicon after <strong>ion</strong>-implantat<strong>ion</strong> using combined x-ray scattering methods. University <strong>of</strong> Lyon (France) <strong>and</strong> Torino (Italy), 2005. 171
20 L. Capello, T. H. Metzger, M. Werner, J. A. van den Berg, M. Servidori, L. Ottaviano, C. Spinella, G. Mannino, T. Feudel, M. Herden. Influence <strong>of</strong> preamorphizat<strong>ion</strong> on the structural properties <strong>of</strong> ultra-shal<strong>low</strong> arsenic <strong>implants</strong> in silicon. (To be published). 21 F. A. Trumbore, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 39 (1960) 205. 22 Rapid Thermal Processing <strong>of</strong> Semiconductors. V. E. Borisenko, P. Hesketh. Plenum Press, 1997. 23 http://www.elecdesign.com/Articles/ArticleID/3400/3400.html (accessed 12/1/06) 24 M. Bruel. Nucl. Instr. <strong>and</strong> Meth. B 108 (1996) 313. 25 http://www.soitec.com/ (accessed 12/1/06) 26 J.J. Hamilton, E.J.H. Collart, B. Colombea, C. Jeynes, M. Bersani, D. Giubertoni, J.A. Sharp, N.E.B. Cowern, K.J. Kirkby. Nucl. Instr. <strong>and</strong> Meth. B 237, (2005) 107. 27 M. von Allmen, S.S. Lau, J.W.Mayer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 35 (1979) 280. 28 G.L. Olsen, J.A. Roth, Kinetics <strong>of</strong> Solid Phase Crystallisat<strong>ion</strong> in Amorphous Silicon. Mat. Sci. Rep. 3 (1978) p1-78. 29 D.A. Williams, R.A. McMahon, H. Ahmed. Mat. Sci. <strong>and</strong> Eng. 4 (1989) 423. 30 H<strong>and</strong>book <strong>of</strong> Semiconductor Silicon Technology. W.C. O’Mara, R.B. Herring, L.P. Hunt, Noyes Publicat<strong>ion</strong>s, New Jersey, 1990. 172
- Page 1 and 2:
Damage formation and annealing stud
- Page 3 and 4:
3.2.2.6 Other models 40 3.2.3 Other
- Page 5 and 6:
Chapter 7 Interaction between Xe, F
- Page 7 and 8:
List of Figures Figure 1.1 a) Schem
- Page 9 and 10:
Figure 4.13 Variation in the kinema
- Page 11 and 12:
Figure 6.10 MEIS energy spectra for
- Page 13 and 14:
Figure 7.8 Combined MEIS Xe depth p
- Page 15 and 16:
Abbreviations and Symbols a/c amorp
- Page 17 and 18:
Abstract The work described in this
- Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 7 5 M. Werner, J.A. van den
- Page 21 and 22:
terminal (Vg), current cannot flow
- Page 23 and 24:
This is an approximate average leve
- Page 25 and 26:
the active channel, adjacent to the
- Page 27 and 28:
To continue to improve devices ther
- Page 29 and 30:
produces a device quality regrown l
- Page 31 and 32:
technique of channelling Rutherford
- Page 33 and 34:
22 J.S Williams. Solid Phase Recrys
- Page 35 and 36:
and the probability of scattering t
- Page 37 and 38:
importance for many atomic collisio
- Page 39 and 40:
M1, V0, E0 Figure 2.2 Elastic scatt
- Page 41 and 42:
2.3.1 Models for inelastic energy l
- Page 43 and 44:
dE/dx (ev/Ang) 10 1 Inelastic Energ
- Page 45 and 46:
dE/dx (eV/Ang) 125 100 75 50 25 0 2
- Page 47 and 48:
Figure 2.5 Results of TRIM simulati
- Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 3 Damage and Annealing proc
- Page 51 and 52:
the Si/SiO2 interface, consuming th
- Page 53 and 54:
On the basis that by creating an in
- Page 55 and 56:
Figure 3.4 Structure of crystalline
- Page 57 and 58:
a Si atom will suffer little angula
- Page 59 and 60:
3.2.2.5 Homogeneous model (Critical
- Page 61 and 62:
Sputtering and atomic mixing play a
- Page 63 and 64:
and is approximately 25 times faste
- Page 65 and 66:
elevant dopants later. For equal co
- Page 67 and 68:
nearest neighbour distance (52). By
- Page 69 and 70:
Category I defects are produced whe
- Page 71 and 72:
thermal annealing (600 - 700 °C an
- Page 73 and 74:
Figure 3.11 Relationship between im
- Page 75 and 76:
defect pairs due to Coulomb attract
- Page 77 and 78:
⎛ 〈 C ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ I 〉 〈 C V
- Page 79 and 80:
27 R.D. Goldberg, J. S. Williams, a
- Page 81 and 82:
67 H. Bracht. Diffusion Mechanism a
- Page 83 and 84:
Hall effect measurements were carri
- Page 85 and 86:
energy than one scattered from an a
- Page 87 and 88:
epresents a small improvement over
- Page 89 and 90:
(dE/dx)out multiplied by the path l
- Page 91 and 92:
they are small compared to the diff
- Page 93 and 94:
ackscattering (27). This fact forms
- Page 95 and 96:
Figure 4.7 a) Plot of a Gaussian di
- Page 97 and 98:
similar to the width of the error f
- Page 99 and 100:
UP Ion Beam SPIN Rotation Sample Sc
- Page 101 and 102:
Kinematic factor (K) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.
- Page 103 and 104:
Figure 4.14 Illustration of the dou
- Page 105 and 106:
4.2.2.4 Interpretation of spectra A
- Page 107 and 108:
with are comparatively small, ~ 0.5
- Page 109 and 110:
Inelastic energy loss (eV/Ang) 32 2
- Page 111 and 112:
iterative procedure is carried out
- Page 113 and 114:
Yield (couts per 5µC) 300 250 200
- Page 115 and 116:
SIMS experiments were also carried
- Page 117 and 118:
MEIS, using the scattering conditio
- Page 119 and 120:
4.5 Sample production Samples have
- Page 121 and 122:
an N2/O2 environment to maintain an
- Page 123 and 124:
38 M. Anderle, M. Barozzi, M. Bersa
- Page 125 and 126:
damage evolution behaviour observed
- Page 127 and 128:
Yield (counts per 5 µC) 250 200 15
- Page 129 and 130:
essentially a “zero dose” profi
- Page 131 and 132:
no longer “visible” in MEIS has
- Page 133 and 134:
yield (cts / 5µC) 500 400 300 200
- Page 135 and 136:
5.4 Conclusion MEIS analysis with a
- Page 137 and 138:
Chapter 6 Annealing studies 6.1 Int
- Page 139 and 140: 6.2.2.2 Results and Discussion Figu
- Page 141 and 142: theory predictions and X-ray fluore
- Page 143 and 144: implantation conditions are those u
- Page 145 and 146: a) b) c) Yield (counts per 5 µC) Y
- Page 147 and 148: greater than MEIS. SIMS is not sens
- Page 149 and 150: attributed to the interference betw
- Page 151 and 152: The as-implanted sample, with a bro
- Page 153 and 154: a) b) Yield (counts per 5 µC) Yiel
- Page 155 and 156: interface, as evidenced by the high
- Page 157 and 158: duration, is observed. MEIS results
- Page 159 and 160: Yield (counts per 5µC) 500 400 300
- Page 161 and 162: ack edges of the Si peaks are very
- Page 163 and 164: underneath the SiO2 layer, iii) it
- Page 165 and 166: R s (Ω/sq) 950 900 850 800 750 60
- Page 167 and 168: As concentration (at/cm 3 ) 1E22 1E
- Page 169 and 170: R s (Ω/sq) 950 900 850 800 750 70
- Page 171 and 172: Following annealing it was observed
- Page 173 and 174: ∆a/a (x 10 -3 ) 4,0 epi550 3,5 3,
- Page 175 and 176: Yield (counts per 5 uC) 350 300 250
- Page 177 and 178: (FWHM). Concomitantly, As in the re
- Page 179 and 180: Yield (counts per 5 µC) 450 400 35
- Page 181 and 182: The higher temperature anneals carr
- Page 183 and 184: ecomes steeper for the sample annea
- Page 185 and 186: Figure 6.28 Schematic illustrations
- Page 187 and 188: and the 2D picture in Figure 6.31b)
- Page 189: 6.5 Conclusion In summary, in this
- Page 193 and 194: egarding B profiles relevant to the
- Page 195 and 196: Yield (counts per 5 µC) 400 300 20
- Page 197 and 198: TRIM AU 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 TRIM si
- Page 199 and 200: a) F profile PAI 3 keV BF2 b) F pro
- Page 201 and 202: Yield (counts per 5 µC) 20 15 10 5
- Page 203 and 204: the corresponding PAI sample, yield
- Page 205 and 206: amorphous matrix, (16) i.e. local c
- Page 207 and 208: 21 M. Anderle, M. Bersani, D. Giube
- Page 209 and 210: stopped at depths beyond the observ
- Page 211: the role of each individual element