Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...
Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ... Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...
approximately 200 nm wide. Implants have been carried out similar to the ones used previously. Annealing conditions used have been predominantly in the low temperature range (550 °C to 700 °C) in order to capture intermediate stages of regrowth, rather than using higher anneal temperatures typical of device production for which the regrowth occurs too quickly. It will be seen that for PAI implant energies which are sufficiently high for some damage to extend to the buried oxide (BOX) interface, regrowth is different from the normally layer-by-layer regrowth, probably through changed seed conditions at the start of the regrowth. 6.4.2 Experimental A range of samples were produced to compare the regrowth of 60 nm, 88 nm and 100 nm SOI wafers with bulk Si wafers. Implantation was carried out using conditions typical for As and BF2 extension implants into crystalline and Xe preamorphised wafers, (3 keV As, to fluences of 2E15 cm -2 and 1E15 cm -2 , 3 keV and 1 keV BF2 implants to a fluence of 7E14cm -2 ). For the PAI samples 40 keV Xe was implanted to a fluence of 1E14cm -2 . Anneals were carried out at the University of Salford. MEIS was carried out with 100 keV He + and the samples were aligned along the [īīı] direction and the analyser positioned to record the [332] and [111] blocking directions. The results from the [111] direction are presented. 6.4.3 Results Results of several experimental series are presented in the next few subsections and an overall discussion, based on all the results, is given in section 6.4.4. 6.4.3.1 No – PAI samples MEIS energy spectra for samples implanted with 3 keV As ions to a dose of 2E15 ions/cm 2 into crystalline bulk Si, 60 nm SOI and 100 nm SOI, respectively, are shown in Figure 6.24, for as-implanted samples and following annealing at 600 °C for 30 s. Also included in the figure is a spectrum from a virgin Si sample and a random spectrum taken from an amorphous Si sample. Depth scales have been added to the figure to give an indication of the depth of scattering from As, Si and O atoms, respectively. The implantation, as is typical, produces an ~ 11 nm wide amorphous layer. For the as-implanted samples there are no major differences observed between the different wafer types. Following annealing all samples have undergone SPER of part of the amorphous layers, with the surface damage peaks extending to a depth of ~ 7 nm 157
(FWHM). Concomitantly, As in the regrown region has taken up substitutional positions invisible to the analysing beam. A small amount of As segregation has occurred, as evidenced by the slight As yield increase at a depth around 5 nm. These findings are entirely similar to those described in section 6.3. No major differences between the different materials are observed. With these shallow implants the implant is well away from the BOX. In this instance the SOI materials would be expected to behave as bulk material, as observed. Yield (counts per 5 µC) 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 O depth (nm) 6 4 2 0 3keV As 2E15 ion/cm 2 [111] Blocking direction Si depth (nm) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 Energy (keV) 6.4.3.2 60nm SOI PAI (40 keV Xe) 3 keV As 1E15 A 60 nm SOI wafer was pre-amorphised with 40 keV Xe + (PAI) to a dose of 1E14 ions/cm 2 . XTEM results (not shown) reveal that the PAI produces an amorphous layer to a depth of approximately 35 nm (13). The PAI was followed by a 3 keV As implant to a dose of 1E15 ion/cm 2 . Note that the As dose was half that of the As implants previously used in this project, (in section 6.2 and 6.3). This would not be expected to fundamentally affect the regrowth mechanism, but probably the regrowth 158 virgin Random Bulk as-impl Bulk 600C 30s 60nm SOI as-impl 60nm SOI 600C 30s 100nm SOI as-impl 100nm SOI 600C 30s As depth (nm) 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Figure 6.24 MEIS energy spectra from bulk Si, 60 nm SOI and 100 nm SOI samples, implanted with 3 keV As to a dose of 2E15 ions/cm 2 , as-implanted and following annealing at 600 °C for 30s.
- Page 125 and 126: damage evolution behaviour observed
- Page 127 and 128: Yield (counts per 5 µC) 250 200 15
- Page 129 and 130: essentially a “zero dose” profi
- Page 131 and 132: no longer “visible” in MEIS has
- Page 133 and 134: yield (cts / 5µC) 500 400 300 200
- Page 135 and 136: 5.4 Conclusion MEIS analysis with a
- Page 137 and 138: Chapter 6 Annealing studies 6.1 Int
- Page 139 and 140: 6.2.2.2 Results and Discussion Figu
- Page 141 and 142: theory predictions and X-ray fluore
- Page 143 and 144: implantation conditions are those u
- Page 145 and 146: a) b) c) Yield (counts per 5 µC) Y
- Page 147 and 148: greater than MEIS. SIMS is not sens
- Page 149 and 150: attributed to the interference betw
- Page 151 and 152: The as-implanted sample, with a bro
- Page 153 and 154: a) b) Yield (counts per 5 µC) Yiel
- Page 155 and 156: interface, as evidenced by the high
- Page 157 and 158: duration, is observed. MEIS results
- Page 159 and 160: Yield (counts per 5µC) 500 400 300
- Page 161 and 162: ack edges of the Si peaks are very
- Page 163 and 164: underneath the SiO2 layer, iii) it
- Page 165 and 166: R s (Ω/sq) 950 900 850 800 750 60
- Page 167 and 168: As concentration (at/cm 3 ) 1E22 1E
- Page 169 and 170: R s (Ω/sq) 950 900 850 800 750 70
- Page 171 and 172: Following annealing it was observed
- Page 173 and 174: ∆a/a (x 10 -3 ) 4,0 epi550 3,5 3,
- Page 175: Yield (counts per 5 uC) 350 300 250
- Page 179 and 180: Yield (counts per 5 µC) 450 400 35
- Page 181 and 182: The higher temperature anneals carr
- Page 183 and 184: ecomes steeper for the sample annea
- Page 185 and 186: Figure 6.28 Schematic illustrations
- Page 187 and 188: and the 2D picture in Figure 6.31b)
- Page 189 and 190: 6.5 Conclusion In summary, in this
- Page 191 and 192: 20 L. Capello, T. H. Metzger, M. We
- Page 193 and 194: egarding B profiles relevant to the
- Page 195 and 196: Yield (counts per 5 µC) 400 300 20
- Page 197 and 198: TRIM AU 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 TRIM si
- Page 199 and 200: a) F profile PAI 3 keV BF2 b) F pro
- Page 201 and 202: Yield (counts per 5 µC) 20 15 10 5
- Page 203 and 204: the corresponding PAI sample, yield
- Page 205 and 206: amorphous matrix, (16) i.e. local c
- Page 207 and 208: 21 M. Anderle, M. Bersani, D. Giube
- Page 209 and 210: stopped at depths beyond the observ
- Page 211: the role of each individual element
approximately 200 nm wide. Implants have been carried out similar to the ones used<br />
previously. Annealing condit<strong>ion</strong>s used have been predominantly in the <strong>low</strong> temperature<br />
range (550 °C to 700 °C) in order to capture intermediate stages <strong>of</strong> regrowth, rather than<br />
using higher anneal temperatures typical <strong>of</strong> device product<strong>ion</strong> for which the regrowth<br />
occurs too quickly. It will be seen that for PAI implant energies which are sufficiently<br />
high for some damage to extend to the buried oxide (BOX) interface, regrowth is<br />
different from the normally layer-by-layer regrowth, probably through changed seed<br />
condit<strong>ion</strong>s at the start <strong>of</strong> the regrowth.<br />
6.4.2 Experimental<br />
A range <strong>of</strong> samples were produced to compare the regrowth <strong>of</strong> 60 nm, 88 nm<br />
<strong>and</strong> 100 nm SOI wafers with bulk Si wafers. Implantat<strong>ion</strong> was carried out using<br />
condit<strong>ion</strong>s typical for As <strong>and</strong> BF2 extens<strong>ion</strong> <strong>implants</strong> into crystalline <strong>and</strong> Xe preamorphised<br />
wafers, (3 keV As, to fluences <strong>of</strong> 2E15 cm -2 <strong>and</strong> 1E15 cm -2 , 3 keV <strong>and</strong> 1<br />
keV BF2 <strong>implants</strong> to a fluence <strong>of</strong> 7E14cm -2 ). For the PAI samples 40 keV Xe was<br />
implanted to a fluence <strong>of</strong> 1E14cm -2 . Anneals were carried out at the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Salford. MEIS was carried out with 100 keV He + <strong>and</strong> the samples were aligned along<br />
the [īīı] direct<strong>ion</strong> <strong>and</strong> the analyser posit<strong>ion</strong>ed to record the [332] <strong>and</strong> [111] blocking<br />
direct<strong>ion</strong>s. The results from the [111] direct<strong>ion</strong> are presented.<br />
6.4.3 Results<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> several experimental series are presented in the next few subsect<strong>ion</strong>s<br />
<strong>and</strong> an overall discuss<strong>ion</strong>, based on all the results, is given in sect<strong>ion</strong> 6.4.4.<br />
6.4.3.1 No – PAI samples<br />
MEIS <strong>energy</strong> spectra for samples implanted with 3 keV As <strong>ion</strong>s to a dose <strong>of</strong><br />
2E15 <strong>ion</strong>s/cm 2 into crystalline bulk Si, 60 nm SOI <strong>and</strong> 100 nm SOI, respectively, are<br />
shown in Figure 6.24, for as-implanted samples <strong>and</strong> fol<strong>low</strong>ing <strong>annealing</strong> at 600 °C for<br />
30 s. Also included in the figure is a spectrum from a virgin Si sample <strong>and</strong> a r<strong>and</strong>om<br />
spectrum taken from an amorphous Si sample. Depth scales have been added to the<br />
figure to give an indicat<strong>ion</strong> <strong>of</strong> the depth <strong>of</strong> scattering from As, Si <strong>and</strong> O atoms,<br />
respectively. The implantat<strong>ion</strong>, as is typical, produces an ~ 11 nm wide amorphous layer.<br />
For the as-implanted samples there are no major differences observed between the<br />
different wafer types. Fol<strong>low</strong>ing <strong>annealing</strong> all samples have undergone SPER <strong>of</strong> part <strong>of</strong><br />
the amorphous layers, with the surface damage peaks extending to a depth <strong>of</strong> ~ 7 nm<br />
157