Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...

Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ... Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...

usir.salford.ac.uk
from usir.salford.ac.uk More from this publisher
23.03.2013 Views

Concentration (at/cm 3 ) 1E22 1E21 1E20 1E19 1E18 1E17 as-implanted No PAI PAI 3keV As 2E15 cm -2 1E16 0 20 40 60 20 40 60 20 40 60 Depth (nm) Figure 6.5 SIMS As depth profiles of the 3keV 2E15 samples, with and without PAI, asimplanted, and after 600C annealing and 1130C spike annealing. 6.2.3.3 Specular reflectivity (SR) results – comparison with MEIS These samples were also analysed with several X-ray techniques at beamline ID01 at the ERSF, Grenoble (Fr) (16). Results obtained from specular reflectivity (SR) experiments provide an interesting and valuable comparison with the MEIS results and as such are briefly discussed here. The strengths of the two techniques, notably the ability of MEIS to produce depth profiles specific to individual elements and the superior depth resolution of SR, have been exploited. The SR results of the PAI and NoPAI series are almost identical, hence only the results of the PAI samples are reported here. A full explanation of the SR technique and more information on the results are given elsewhere (17-20). It should be mentioned that SR measurements are sensitive to the electron density perpendicular to the sample surface, independent of whether the sample is crystalline or amorphous (18, 19). The SR results from the PAI samples are shown in Figure 6.6a) together with the measurement of a non-implanted (virgin) sample. These are plots of the measured reflected intensity vs z in reciprocal space. The resulting profiles show oscillations, which are most pronounced after spike annealing. The period of the oscillations is 129 600°C 20 min 1130°C spike

attributed to the interference between the air/SiO2 surface and the interface at the high density, subsurface layer to which the As and any Si interstitials are swept by the regrowing crystalline front. For the as-implanted sample the As depth distribution is broad without sharp interfaces, as can be seen by the MEIS results shown in Figure 6.3 and 6.4a). As a consequence SR reflectivity appears to be quite similar as the nonimplanted wafer where only one long-period oscillation is observed resulting from the thin native oxide. The resulting electron density profiles from a fit of the data are given in Figure 6.6 b). a) b) Reflectivity 10 1 10 -1 10 -3 10 -5 10 -7 10 -9 10 -11 PAI as-impl. PAI 600 PAI spike Non-implanted Fits 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 q [Å z -1 ] SR does not possess specific mass sensitivity, unlike MEIS which can unambiguously distinguish between scattering off different masses. Through a comparison with the MEIS profiles (Figure 6.3 and 6.4), regions in the SR density profiles (Figure 6.6b) can be attributed to the different layers and features of the samples, i.e. the SiO2 layer and the As rich segregated layer, these are indicated in Figure 6.6b). A contribution to the As rich peak from Si interstitials swept in front of the a/c interface during SPER may also occur. An advantage of the SR measurements is that in some instances the thickness of layers may be inferred with more accuracy than with MEIS. With MEIS it is unavoidable that for very thin layers some broadening occurs due to the system energy resolution and energy straggling. Returning to the results and considering first the spike annealed sample, the SR density depth profile shows a segregated As rich peak with a width of 0.7 nm. The SR result of 0.7 nm agrees well with the theoretical result of 1ML segregated As (8). This shows up a significant difference in the As layer thickness between MEIS and SR, with ρ el [Å -3 ] 130 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 SiO 2 Third layer PAI as-impl. PAI 600 PAI spike As-rich layer Si bulk 0 30 60 90 Depth [Å] Figure 6.6 a) Specular reflectivity curves for the PAI sample series and non-implanted Si with corresponding fits. b) Depth profile of the density as derived from the fits. From (19, 20).

attributed to the interference between the air/SiO2 surface <strong>and</strong> the interface at the high<br />

density, subsurface layer to which the As <strong>and</strong> any Si interstitials are swept by the<br />

regrowing crystalline front. For the as-implanted sample the As depth distribut<strong>ion</strong> is<br />

broad without sharp interfaces, as can be seen by the MEIS results shown in Figure 6.3<br />

<strong>and</strong> 6.4a). As a consequence SR reflectivity appears to be quite similar as the nonimplanted<br />

wafer where only one long-period oscillat<strong>ion</strong> is observed resulting from the<br />

thin native oxide. The resulting electron density pr<strong>of</strong>iles from a fit <strong>of</strong> the data are given<br />

in Figure 6.6 b).<br />

a) b)<br />

Reflectivity<br />

10 1<br />

10 -1<br />

10 -3<br />

10 -5<br />

10 -7<br />

10 -9<br />

10 -11<br />

PAI as-impl.<br />

PAI 600<br />

PAI spike<br />

Non-implanted<br />

Fits<br />

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8<br />

q [Å z -1 ]<br />

SR does not possess specific mass sensitivity, unlike MEIS which can<br />

unambiguously distinguish between scattering <strong>of</strong>f different masses. Through a<br />

comparison with the MEIS pr<strong>of</strong>iles (Figure 6.3 <strong>and</strong> 6.4), reg<strong>ion</strong>s in the SR density<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles (Figure 6.6b) can be attributed to the different layers <strong>and</strong> features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

samples, i.e. the SiO2 layer <strong>and</strong> the As rich segregated layer, these are indicated in<br />

Figure 6.6b). A contribut<strong>ion</strong> to the As rich peak from Si interstitials swept in front <strong>of</strong><br />

the a/c interface during SPER may also occur. An advantage <strong>of</strong> the SR measurements is<br />

that in some instances the thickness <strong>of</strong> layers may be inferred with more accuracy than<br />

with MEIS. With MEIS it is unavoidable that for very thin layers some broadening<br />

occurs due to the system <strong>energy</strong> resolut<strong>ion</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>energy</strong> straggling.<br />

Returning to the results <strong>and</strong> considering first the spike annealed sample, the SR<br />

density depth pr<strong>of</strong>ile shows a segregated As rich peak with a width <strong>of</strong> 0.7 nm. The SR<br />

result <strong>of</strong> 0.7 nm agrees well with the theoretical result <strong>of</strong> 1ML segregated As (8). This<br />

shows up a significant difference in the As layer thickness between MEIS <strong>and</strong> SR, with<br />

ρ el [Å -3 ]<br />

130<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

SiO 2<br />

Third layer<br />

PAI as-impl.<br />

PAI 600<br />

PAI spike<br />

As-rich<br />

layer<br />

Si bulk<br />

0 30 60 90<br />

Depth [Å]<br />

Figure 6.6 a) Specular reflectivity curves for the PAI sample series <strong>and</strong> non-implanted Si with<br />

corresponding fits. b) Depth pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the density as derived from the fits. From (19, 20).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!