Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...
Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ... Damage formation and annealing studies of low energy ion implants ...
Concentration (at/cm 3 ) 1E22 1E21 1E20 1E19 1E18 1E17 as-implanted No PAI PAI 3keV As 2E15 cm -2 1E16 0 20 40 60 20 40 60 20 40 60 Depth (nm) Figure 6.5 SIMS As depth profiles of the 3keV 2E15 samples, with and without PAI, asimplanted, and after 600C annealing and 1130C spike annealing. 6.2.3.3 Specular reflectivity (SR) results – comparison with MEIS These samples were also analysed with several X-ray techniques at beamline ID01 at the ERSF, Grenoble (Fr) (16). Results obtained from specular reflectivity (SR) experiments provide an interesting and valuable comparison with the MEIS results and as such are briefly discussed here. The strengths of the two techniques, notably the ability of MEIS to produce depth profiles specific to individual elements and the superior depth resolution of SR, have been exploited. The SR results of the PAI and NoPAI series are almost identical, hence only the results of the PAI samples are reported here. A full explanation of the SR technique and more information on the results are given elsewhere (17-20). It should be mentioned that SR measurements are sensitive to the electron density perpendicular to the sample surface, independent of whether the sample is crystalline or amorphous (18, 19). The SR results from the PAI samples are shown in Figure 6.6a) together with the measurement of a non-implanted (virgin) sample. These are plots of the measured reflected intensity vs z in reciprocal space. The resulting profiles show oscillations, which are most pronounced after spike annealing. The period of the oscillations is 129 600°C 20 min 1130°C spike
attributed to the interference between the air/SiO2 surface and the interface at the high density, subsurface layer to which the As and any Si interstitials are swept by the regrowing crystalline front. For the as-implanted sample the As depth distribution is broad without sharp interfaces, as can be seen by the MEIS results shown in Figure 6.3 and 6.4a). As a consequence SR reflectivity appears to be quite similar as the nonimplanted wafer where only one long-period oscillation is observed resulting from the thin native oxide. The resulting electron density profiles from a fit of the data are given in Figure 6.6 b). a) b) Reflectivity 10 1 10 -1 10 -3 10 -5 10 -7 10 -9 10 -11 PAI as-impl. PAI 600 PAI spike Non-implanted Fits 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 q [Å z -1 ] SR does not possess specific mass sensitivity, unlike MEIS which can unambiguously distinguish between scattering off different masses. Through a comparison with the MEIS profiles (Figure 6.3 and 6.4), regions in the SR density profiles (Figure 6.6b) can be attributed to the different layers and features of the samples, i.e. the SiO2 layer and the As rich segregated layer, these are indicated in Figure 6.6b). A contribution to the As rich peak from Si interstitials swept in front of the a/c interface during SPER may also occur. An advantage of the SR measurements is that in some instances the thickness of layers may be inferred with more accuracy than with MEIS. With MEIS it is unavoidable that for very thin layers some broadening occurs due to the system energy resolution and energy straggling. Returning to the results and considering first the spike annealed sample, the SR density depth profile shows a segregated As rich peak with a width of 0.7 nm. The SR result of 0.7 nm agrees well with the theoretical result of 1ML segregated As (8). This shows up a significant difference in the As layer thickness between MEIS and SR, with ρ el [Å -3 ] 130 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 SiO 2 Third layer PAI as-impl. PAI 600 PAI spike As-rich layer Si bulk 0 30 60 90 Depth [Å] Figure 6.6 a) Specular reflectivity curves for the PAI sample series and non-implanted Si with corresponding fits. b) Depth profile of the density as derived from the fits. From (19, 20).
- Page 97 and 98: similar to the width of the error f
- Page 99 and 100: UP Ion Beam SPIN Rotation Sample Sc
- Page 101 and 102: Kinematic factor (K) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 4.14 Illustration of the dou
- Page 105 and 106: 4.2.2.4 Interpretation of spectra A
- Page 107 and 108: with are comparatively small, ~ 0.5
- Page 109 and 110: Inelastic energy loss (eV/Ang) 32 2
- Page 111 and 112: iterative procedure is carried out
- Page 113 and 114: Yield (couts per 5µC) 300 250 200
- Page 115 and 116: SIMS experiments were also carried
- Page 117 and 118: MEIS, using the scattering conditio
- Page 119 and 120: 4.5 Sample production Samples have
- Page 121 and 122: an N2/O2 environment to maintain an
- Page 123 and 124: 38 M. Anderle, M. Barozzi, M. Bersa
- Page 125 and 126: damage evolution behaviour observed
- Page 127 and 128: Yield (counts per 5 µC) 250 200 15
- Page 129 and 130: essentially a “zero dose” profi
- Page 131 and 132: no longer “visible” in MEIS has
- Page 133 and 134: yield (cts / 5µC) 500 400 300 200
- Page 135 and 136: 5.4 Conclusion MEIS analysis with a
- Page 137 and 138: Chapter 6 Annealing studies 6.1 Int
- Page 139 and 140: 6.2.2.2 Results and Discussion Figu
- Page 141 and 142: theory predictions and X-ray fluore
- Page 143 and 144: implantation conditions are those u
- Page 145 and 146: a) b) c) Yield (counts per 5 µC) Y
- Page 147: greater than MEIS. SIMS is not sens
- Page 151 and 152: The as-implanted sample, with a bro
- Page 153 and 154: a) b) Yield (counts per 5 µC) Yiel
- Page 155 and 156: interface, as evidenced by the high
- Page 157 and 158: duration, is observed. MEIS results
- Page 159 and 160: Yield (counts per 5µC) 500 400 300
- Page 161 and 162: ack edges of the Si peaks are very
- Page 163 and 164: underneath the SiO2 layer, iii) it
- Page 165 and 166: R s (Ω/sq) 950 900 850 800 750 60
- Page 167 and 168: As concentration (at/cm 3 ) 1E22 1E
- Page 169 and 170: R s (Ω/sq) 950 900 850 800 750 70
- Page 171 and 172: Following annealing it was observed
- Page 173 and 174: ∆a/a (x 10 -3 ) 4,0 epi550 3,5 3,
- Page 175 and 176: Yield (counts per 5 uC) 350 300 250
- Page 177 and 178: (FWHM). Concomitantly, As in the re
- Page 179 and 180: Yield (counts per 5 µC) 450 400 35
- Page 181 and 182: The higher temperature anneals carr
- Page 183 and 184: ecomes steeper for the sample annea
- Page 185 and 186: Figure 6.28 Schematic illustrations
- Page 187 and 188: and the 2D picture in Figure 6.31b)
- Page 189 and 190: 6.5 Conclusion In summary, in this
- Page 191 and 192: 20 L. Capello, T. H. Metzger, M. We
- Page 193 and 194: egarding B profiles relevant to the
- Page 195 and 196: Yield (counts per 5 µC) 400 300 20
- Page 197 and 198: TRIM AU 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 TRIM si
attributed to the interference between the air/SiO2 surface <strong>and</strong> the interface at the high<br />
density, subsurface layer to which the As <strong>and</strong> any Si interstitials are swept by the<br />
regrowing crystalline front. For the as-implanted sample the As depth distribut<strong>ion</strong> is<br />
broad without sharp interfaces, as can be seen by the MEIS results shown in Figure 6.3<br />
<strong>and</strong> 6.4a). As a consequence SR reflectivity appears to be quite similar as the nonimplanted<br />
wafer where only one long-period oscillat<strong>ion</strong> is observed resulting from the<br />
thin native oxide. The resulting electron density pr<strong>of</strong>iles from a fit <strong>of</strong> the data are given<br />
in Figure 6.6 b).<br />
a) b)<br />
Reflectivity<br />
10 1<br />
10 -1<br />
10 -3<br />
10 -5<br />
10 -7<br />
10 -9<br />
10 -11<br />
PAI as-impl.<br />
PAI 600<br />
PAI spike<br />
Non-implanted<br />
Fits<br />
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8<br />
q [Å z -1 ]<br />
SR does not possess specific mass sensitivity, unlike MEIS which can<br />
unambiguously distinguish between scattering <strong>of</strong>f different masses. Through a<br />
comparison with the MEIS pr<strong>of</strong>iles (Figure 6.3 <strong>and</strong> 6.4), reg<strong>ion</strong>s in the SR density<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>iles (Figure 6.6b) can be attributed to the different layers <strong>and</strong> features <strong>of</strong> the<br />
samples, i.e. the SiO2 layer <strong>and</strong> the As rich segregated layer, these are indicated in<br />
Figure 6.6b). A contribut<strong>ion</strong> to the As rich peak from Si interstitials swept in front <strong>of</strong><br />
the a/c interface during SPER may also occur. An advantage <strong>of</strong> the SR measurements is<br />
that in some instances the thickness <strong>of</strong> layers may be inferred with more accuracy than<br />
with MEIS. With MEIS it is unavoidable that for very thin layers some broadening<br />
occurs due to the system <strong>energy</strong> resolut<strong>ion</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>energy</strong> straggling.<br />
Returning to the results <strong>and</strong> considering first the spike annealed sample, the SR<br />
density depth pr<strong>of</strong>ile shows a segregated As rich peak with a width <strong>of</strong> 0.7 nm. The SR<br />
result <strong>of</strong> 0.7 nm agrees well with the theoretical result <strong>of</strong> 1ML segregated As (8). This<br />
shows up a significant difference in the As layer thickness between MEIS <strong>and</strong> SR, with<br />
ρ el [Å -3 ]<br />
130<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
SiO 2<br />
Third layer<br />
PAI as-impl.<br />
PAI 600<br />
PAI spike<br />
As-rich<br />
layer<br />
Si bulk<br />
0 30 60 90<br />
Depth [Å]<br />
Figure 6.6 a) Specular reflectivity curves for the PAI sample series <strong>and</strong> non-implanted Si with<br />
corresponding fits. b) Depth pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the density as derived from the fits. From (19, 20).