23.03.2013 Views

Biomedical Engineering – From Theory to Applications

Biomedical Engineering – From Theory to Applications

Biomedical Engineering – From Theory to Applications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

106<br />

<strong>Biomedical</strong> <strong>Engineering</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>From</strong> <strong>Theory</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Applications</strong><br />

Linearity of the calibration lines is indicated by the values of the corresponding correlation<br />

coefficient (r) and coefficient of determination (r 2). Column coupled techniques show<br />

acceptable linearity, in many cases better as it is in single column systems. Moreover, a<br />

linear dynamic range of the analytes can be considerably extended because of an elimination<br />

of major matrix constituents, higher sample load capacity, and sample preconcentration.<br />

Precision (the repeatability) is usually expressed via relative standard deviation (RSD) of (i)<br />

peak areas measured within the concentration range of calibration line and/or (ii) migration<br />

times of analytes. Hydrodynamically closed separation systems contributed <strong>to</strong> high<br />

precisions of both the migration and quantitation data in comparison with the flow<br />

electrophoretic and non electrophoretic systems. It is because of a fluctuation of the flow<br />

velocity in the separation system contributing <strong>to</strong> a dispersion of the data.<br />

Accuracy (expressed via relative error, RE) is evaluated through the recovery test of the<br />

analytes from relevant matrices (dosage form, urine, blood, etc.) at different concentration<br />

levels. Recovery is evaluated by spiking of blank complex matrix (dosage form, urine, blood,<br />

etc.) and water samples with an analyte at different concentration levels and comparing<br />

resulting peak areas of the analyte obtained in the different matrices (spiked complex matrix<br />

vs. spiked water). An on-line sample pretreatment can considerably enhance the recovery and<br />

accuracy of the method due <strong>to</strong> well controlled sample preparation procedure, minimization of<br />

the analyte losses, and effective elimination of the interfering matrix constituents.<br />

The main performance parameters of particular column coupled methods are introduced in<br />

the Table 1 for a quick overview, what these electrophoretic techniques offer when using<br />

them in biomedical analysis.<br />

Method<br />

(Detection)<br />

LOD<br />

(LOQ)<br />

Capillary arrangement<br />

9.3 ng/mL<br />

ITP-CZE (DAD) (LOQ<br />

28.3 ng/mL)<br />

6.5 ng/mL<br />

ITP-CZE (DAD) (LOQ<br />

9.7 ng/mL)<br />

ITP-CZE (DAD)<br />

ITP-CZE (DAD)<br />

ITP-CZE (UV)<br />

ITP-CZE (UV)<br />

9.3 and 10.4<br />

ng/mL<br />

(LOQ 28.2 and<br />

31.5 ng/mL)<br />

5.2 and 6.8<br />

ng/mL<br />

(LOQ 7.7 and<br />

10.1 ng/mL)<br />

4.8, 1.1, 3.2<br />

ng/mL<br />

(LOQ 16.0, 3.7,<br />

10.7 ng/mL)<br />

250 ng/mL<br />

(LOQ<br />

830 ng/mL)<br />

Linearity<br />

(r)<br />

Precision a<br />

(RSD, %)<br />

Recovery (%),<br />

(matrix)<br />

0.99989 - 104.7 (urine) Robustness<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!