23.03.2013 Views

Biomedical Engineering – From Theory to Applications

Biomedical Engineering – From Theory to Applications

Biomedical Engineering – From Theory to Applications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Column Coupling Electrophoresis in <strong>Biomedical</strong> Analysis<br />

1997, 1998). However, the efficiency and peak capacity of high-speed CE separations are<br />

often not high enough <strong>to</strong> resolve complex mixtures. Recently, improvements in injection<br />

technique and detection limits have improved separation efficiency (Bowser & Kennedy,<br />

2001). In the microdialysis, the minimum volume required for analysis often determines the<br />

rate at which the dialysate can be sampled. On-line microdialysis-derivatization-CE-LIF<br />

assays as proposed by Lada et al. (Lada et al., 1997) (for the instrumental scheme see Fig. 10)<br />

eliminate fraction collection. The separation capillary was coupled <strong>to</strong> the reac<strong>to</strong>r capillary<br />

via a flow-gated interface which allowed dialysate samples <strong>to</strong> be au<strong>to</strong>matically injected on<strong>to</strong><br />

the separation capillary. This elimination of fraction collection, combined with the high<br />

mass sensitivity of LIF or electrochemical detec<strong>to</strong>rs, makes sampling rates on the order of<br />

seconds possible (Thompson et al., 1999; Lada et al., 1997, 1998). The microdialysis-CZE-LIF<br />

system with on-line derivatization has the advantage of simultaneously obtained high<br />

relative recoveries and good temporal resolution with (in-vivo) microdialysis sampling for<br />

the real biological system (brain) (Lada et al., 1997).<br />

Fig. 10. Diagram of the microdialysis:CZE-LIF system with on-line derivatization. Reprinted<br />

from ref. (Lada et al., 1997), with permission.<br />

3.2 Microchip format<br />

Developments in the fields of microfluidics and microfabrication during the last 15 years<br />

have given rise <strong>to</strong> microchips with broad ranges of functionality and versatility in the areas<br />

of bioanalysis such as clinical applications (Li & Kricka, 2006) and chiral separations (Belder,<br />

2006). Microfluidic devices such as microchips can provide several additional advantages<br />

over electromigration techniques performed in capillary format. The heat dissipation is<br />

much better in chip format compared with that in a capillary and therefore higher electric<br />

fields can be applied across channels of microchip. This fact enables, along with a<br />

considerably reduced length of channels, significant shortening of separation time<br />

(millisecond analysis time is possible <strong>to</strong> achieve, see e.g. (Belder, 2006)). Sample and reagent<br />

consumption is markedly reduced in microchannels. Hence, microchip capillary<br />

electrophoresis (MCE) can provide a unique possibility of ultraspeed separations of<br />

microscale sample amounts. Applicable are both electrophoretic (Gong & Hauser, 2006;<br />

Belder, 2006) as well as electrochroma<strong>to</strong>graphic modes (Weng et al., 2006).<br />

In practice, however, the resolution achievable in MCE devices is often lower compared <strong>to</strong><br />

that obtainable in classical CE utilizing considerably longer separation capillaries. In order<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!