23.03.2013 Views

Biomedical Engineering – From Theory to Applications

Biomedical Engineering – From Theory to Applications

Biomedical Engineering – From Theory to Applications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Column Coupling Electrophoresis in <strong>Biomedical</strong> Analysis<br />

derivatization reaction for carnitine as the model analyte was carried out on a FI system<br />

coupled with the CE equipment via a programmable arm (Valcárcel et al., 1998). The<br />

arrangement is shown in Fig. 7. The derivatization reagent (FMOC-Cl) is introduced directly<br />

in<strong>to</strong> the loop of the injection valve (IV) when load position is selected, while the sample is<br />

introduced in<strong>to</strong> the system and it is mixed with the buffer (carbonate). Then, valve is<br />

switched <strong>to</strong> the injection position allowing the mixing of sample<strong>–</strong>buffer and reagent<br />

solution. In this position the flow is s<strong>to</strong>pped for a defined time in the reac<strong>to</strong>r loop (390 cm),<br />

which is introduced in<strong>to</strong> the thermostatic bath (50°C). Finally, the reaction mixture is<br />

introduced via the mechanic arm in<strong>to</strong> the CE system.<br />

The third generation of flow-injection (labora<strong>to</strong>ry-on valve, lab-on-valve or LOV) allows<br />

scaling-down sample and reagent volumes <strong>to</strong> the 10<strong>–</strong>20 L range, while waste production is<br />

typically 0.1<strong>–</strong>0.2 mL per assay (Solich et al., 2004). These facts make LOV an ideal <strong>to</strong>ol for<br />

on-line coupling with CE systems (Kulka et al., 2006).<br />

3.1.2.2 SPE-CE<br />

The new trends in the coupling between SPE<strong>–</strong>CE are focused on several strategies, one of<br />

which involves developing new materials <strong>to</strong> increase the retention and selectivity of some<br />

analytes. In this sense the increasing use of materials such as immunoaffinity sorbents has<br />

been shown <strong>to</strong> overcome the problem of selectivity especially when complex samples are<br />

analysed. The use of molecular imprinted polymers (MIP) could be also an attractive<br />

alternative and further development is expected in this area in the near future. Carbon<br />

nanostructures also seem <strong>to</strong> be very promising materials which are in the first stages of<br />

development and so more research is expected in this field (Puig et al., 2007).<br />

Fig. 8. Schematic diagram of the three types of interfaces for on-line SPE<strong>–</strong>CE coupling: (a)<br />

vial interface; (b) valve interface; (c) T-split interface. Reproduced with permission from (a)<br />

Stroink et al. (Stroink et al., 2003), (b) Tempels et al. (Tempels et al, 2007) and (c) Puig et al.<br />

(Puig et al., 2007).<br />

Extraction techniques now play a major role for sample preparation in CE. These techniques<br />

can be used not only for reconstitution of the sample from small volumes but also for<br />

sample purification in complex matrices and desalting for very saline samples that would<br />

interfere with the electrophoretic process (e.g. FESS requires low conductivity sample).<br />

Considerable progress has been made <strong>to</strong>wards the coupling of solid phase extraction (SPE)<br />

with a subsequent electrophoresis while coupling of liquid phase extraction (LLE) with<br />

electrophoresis is less used. Before coupling the SPE and CE, the appropriate SPE conditions<br />

for trapping and eluting the test compounds must be investigated. The breakthrough<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!