Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems
Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems
Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
492 A. Buchleitner et al. / Physics Reports 368 (2002) 409–547<br />
Fig. 36. Contours of the e ective Hamiltonian, Eq. (212), <strong>in</strong> the (L0; ) plane (with L0=L=n0 the scaled angular momentum,<br />
and the angle between the major axis of the elliptical trajectory and the eld axis). The potential surface generates<br />
the slow evolution of the angular coord<strong>in</strong>ates of the Kepler trajectory of a Rydberg electron exposed to coll<strong>in</strong>ear, static<br />
and resonant micro<strong>wave</strong> electric elds. Initial atomic pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>quantum</strong> number n0 = 60; scaled micro<strong>wave</strong> amplitude<br />
F0 = Fn 4 0 =0:03, and scaled static eld amplitude Fs;0 =0:12F0 ¡Fs;c (a), Fs;0 =0:25F0 ¿Fs;c (b), with Fs;c the critical<br />
static eld amplitude de ned <strong>in</strong> Eq. (213). The lighter the background, the higher the e ective energy. The contours are<br />
plotted at the semiclassical energies which quantize He accord<strong>in</strong>g to Eq. (163), and thus represent the 60 eigenenergies<br />
shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 37. Observe the motion of the stable island along the = l<strong>in</strong>e (correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the energetically highest<br />
state <strong>in</strong> the manifold), under changes of Fs.<br />
Explicit evaluation of the ground state energy of the locally harmonic potential yields the e ective<br />
Hamiltonian for the slow motion <strong>in</strong> the (L; ) plane:<br />
He = −<br />
(L; )<br />
+ F 1(L; )+FsX0(L) cos ;<br />
2<br />
(212)<br />
where all quantities are evaluated at Î =Î 1. For the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of the angular localization properties<br />
of the <strong>wave</strong> packet it is now su cient to <strong>in</strong>spect the extrema of He .<br />
For Fs;0 = 0, we recover the pure LP case with a maximum along the l<strong>in</strong>e L0 = 1 (circular state),<br />
and a m<strong>in</strong>imum at L0 =0, = =2 (see Fig. 19), correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a straight l<strong>in</strong>e orbit perpendicular<br />
to the eld. For <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g Fs;0, the maximum moves towards lower values of L0, and contracts <strong>in</strong><br />
, whereas the m<strong>in</strong>imum approaches = 0 for constant L0 = 0, see Fig. 36. It is easy to show that<br />
there exists a critical value Fs;c of the static eld, depend<strong>in</strong>g on Î 1,<br />
Fs;c = 2<br />
3<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
F0J ′ 1(1) −<br />
3F0J ′ 1 (1)<br />
4Î 1<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
0:217F0 − 0:164<br />
√ F0<br />
Î 1<br />
; (213)<br />
above which both xed po<strong>in</strong>ts reach L0 = 0. Then, <strong>in</strong> particular, the maximum at L0 =0, = ,<br />
corresponds to a straight l<strong>in</strong>e orbit parallel to ˜Fs. Note that <strong>in</strong> the classical limit, Î 1 →∞, Eq. (213)<br />
recovers the purely classical value [153] for angular stability of the straight l<strong>in</strong>e orbit along the<br />
polarization axis, as it should. Therefore, by variation of Fs;0 ∈ [0;Fs;c], we are able to cont<strong>in</strong>uously<br />
tune the position of the maximum <strong>in</strong> the (L0; ) plane. Consequently, application of an additional<br />
static electric eld gives us control over the trajectory traced by the <strong>wave</strong> packet. This is further<br />
illustrated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 37, through the semiclassical level dynamics of the resonantly <strong>driven</strong> manifold<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from the n0 = 60 energy shell, as a function of Fs. In the limit Fs = 0, the spectrum