23.03.2013 Views

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A. Buchleitner et al. / Physics Reports 368 (2002) 409–547 489<br />

Fig. 35. <strong>Non</strong>-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong> <strong>packets</strong> of the two-dimensional hydrogen atom exposed to an elliptically polarized, resonant<br />

micro<strong>wave</strong> eld. Scaled micro<strong>wave</strong> amplitude F0 =0:03 (for resonant pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>quantum</strong> number n0 = 21), and ellipticity<br />

=0:4. Top row: non-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong> packet mov<strong>in</strong>g on a circular orbit corotat<strong>in</strong>g with the micro<strong>wave</strong> eld, for phases<br />

!t =0; =4; =2 (from left to right). This <strong>wave</strong> packet evolves <strong>in</strong>to the eigenstate represented <strong>in</strong> Fig. 27, under cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease of the ellipticity to = 1. Bottom row: non-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong> packet launched along the same circular orbit, but<br />

contra-rotat<strong>in</strong>g with the driv<strong>in</strong>g eld (for the same phases). Note that, while the co-rotat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>wave</strong> packet almost preserves<br />

its shape dur<strong>in</strong>g the temporal evolution, the contra-rotat<strong>in</strong>g one exhibits signi cant distortions dur<strong>in</strong>g one eld cycle, as<br />

a direct consequence of its complicated level dynamics shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 34. Still be<strong>in</strong>g an exactly time-periodic Floquet<br />

eigenstate, it rega<strong>in</strong>s its shape after every period of the micro<strong>wave</strong>. The size of each box extends over ±800 Bohr radii, <strong>in</strong><br />

both x and y directions, with the nucleus <strong>in</strong> the middle. The major axis of the polarization ellipse is along the horizontal<br />

x axis and the micro<strong>wave</strong> eld po<strong>in</strong>ts to the right at t =0:<br />

vary<strong>in</strong>g from LP to CP. The agreement is excellent, with slightly larger discrepancies between the<br />

semiclassical and the exact results for the states with smallest energy. For those states the resonance<br />

island is very small (small 1), what expla<strong>in</strong>s the discrepancy.<br />

The highest ly<strong>in</strong>g state <strong>in</strong> Fig. 34, ascend<strong>in</strong>g with , is a non-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong>-packet state located<br />

on the circular orbit and corotat<strong>in</strong>g with the EP eld. It is shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 35 for =0:4. As mentioned<br />

above, the correspond<strong>in</strong>g counterrotat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>wave</strong> packet is energetically degenerate with the co-rotat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

one for = 0. Its energy decreases with (cf. Fig. 34). It is shown <strong>in</strong> the bottom row <strong>in</strong> Fig. 35<br />

for =0:4. While the corotat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>wave</strong> packet preserves its shape for all values (except at isolated<br />

avoided cross<strong>in</strong>gs) the counter-rotat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>wave</strong> packet undergoes a series of strong avoided cross<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

for ¿0:42, progressively loos<strong>in</strong>g its localized character. This is related to a strong decrease of the<br />

maximum of 1 at M0 = −1 with , clearly visible <strong>in</strong> Fig. 33.<br />

While we have discussed the two-dimensional case only, the CP situation (compare Section 3.4)<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates that for su ciently large , the important resonant motion occurs <strong>in</strong> the polarization plane,<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g stable vs. small deviations <strong>in</strong> the z direction. Thus the calculations presented above are also<br />

relevant for the real three-dimensional world, provided is not far from unity [69,73]. For arbitrary<br />

, a full 3D analysis is required. While this is clearly more <strong>in</strong>volved, the general scenario of a <strong>wave</strong><br />

packet anchored to a resonance island will certa<strong>in</strong>ly prevail.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!