23.03.2013 Views

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. Buchleitner et al. / Physics Reports 368 (2002) 409–547 471<br />

Fig. 26. Same as Fig. 25, but for N = 2. The <strong>quantum</strong> states orig<strong>in</strong>ate from the manifold n0 = 20. The resonance island<br />

<strong>in</strong> the (Î; ˆ ) coord<strong>in</strong>ates is too small to support any N = 2 states for F0 ¡ 0:03, as seen from the negative slope of the<br />

quasienergy levels. The <strong>quantum</strong> states “cross” the separatrix as the amplitude is further <strong>in</strong>creased, and successively enter<br />

the resonance zone, start<strong>in</strong>g from the largest value of p <strong>in</strong> Eq. (163) (the resonance island size <strong>in</strong>creases with p). Even<br />

for F0 ¿ 0:04; only a m<strong>in</strong>ority of substates of the n0 = 20 manifold is well represented by the resonant semiclassical<br />

dynamics (<strong>in</strong>dicated by the solid l<strong>in</strong>es).<br />

polarization, and thus a di erent form of the <strong>in</strong>teraction Hamiltonian, Eq. (111), Kepler trajectories<br />

which are dist<strong>in</strong>ct from those considered <strong>in</strong> the LP case will be most e ciently locked on the<br />

external driv<strong>in</strong>g. Hence, <strong>in</strong> the sequal, we shall launch non-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong> <strong>packets</strong> along periodic<br />

orbits which are dist<strong>in</strong>ct from those encountered above.<br />

Historically, the creation of non-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong> <strong>packets</strong> <strong>in</strong> CP and LP micro<strong>wave</strong> elds, respectively,<br />

has been considered quite <strong>in</strong>dependently. In particular, <strong>in</strong> the CP case, the notion of<br />

non-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong> <strong>packets</strong> has been <strong>in</strong>troduced [34] along quite di erent l<strong>in</strong>es than the one<br />

adopted <strong>in</strong> this review. The orig<strong>in</strong>al work, as well as subsequent studies of the CP situation<br />

[44,45,47,49,50,55,61,63] used the fact that, <strong>in</strong> this speci c case, the time dependence of the Hamiltonian<br />

may be removed by a unitary transformation to the rotat<strong>in</strong>g frame (see below). Thus, the<br />

stable periodic orbit at the center of the island turns <strong>in</strong>to a stable equilibrium po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the rotat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

frame. This allows the expansion of the Hamiltonian <strong>in</strong>to a Taylor series <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of the xed<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t, and <strong>in</strong> particular a standard harmonic treatment us<strong>in</strong>g normal modes. We shall review this<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e of reason<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> detail below. It is, however, <strong>in</strong>structive to rst discuss the very same system<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g the general resonance approach exposed <strong>in</strong> Section 3.1.<br />

3.4.1. Hamiltonian<br />

With ˆz the propagation direction of the micro<strong>wave</strong>, the electric eld rotates <strong>in</strong> the x–y plane, and<br />

Hamiltonian (106) takes the follow<strong>in</strong>g explicit form:<br />

HCP = ˜p2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

− + F{x cos(!t)+y s<strong>in</strong>(!t)} : (164)<br />

r

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!