23.03.2013 Views

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A. Buchleitner et al. / Physics Reports 368 (2002) 409–547 467<br />

Fig. 22. Level dynamics of the numerically exact quasienergies (...) <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of the resonant manifold emerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from n0 =21 (N =0), compared to the semiclassical prediction (—), for F0 =Fn 4 0 =0:::0:06. Note that the maximum eld<br />

amplitude exceeds the typical ionization thresholds measured <strong>in</strong> current experiments for !n 3 0 1 [132–134]. <strong>Non</strong>theless,<br />

the semiclassical prediction accurately tracks the exact solution across a large number of avoided cross<strong>in</strong>gs with other<br />

Rydberg manifolds.<br />

the separatrix state p = 10. Such good agreement is a direct proof of the validity of the adiabatic<br />

separation between the slow motion <strong>in</strong> (L; ), and the fast motion <strong>in</strong> (Î; ˆ ).<br />

Fig. 22 shows a global comparison of the semiclassical prediction with the exact level dynamics<br />

(energy levels vs. F0), <strong>in</strong> a range from F0 =0 to 0.06, which exceeds the typical ionization threshold<br />

(F0 0:05) observed <strong>in</strong> current experiments [132–134]. We observe that the semiclassical prediction<br />

tracks the exact quasienergies quite accurately, even for large F0-values, where the resonant n0 =21<br />

manifold overlaps with other Rydberg manifolds, or with side bands of lower or higher ly<strong>in</strong>g Rydberg<br />

states. The agreement becomes unsatisfactory only <strong>in</strong> the region of very small F0, where the size<br />

of the resonance island <strong>in</strong> (Î; ˆ ) is very small. This is not unexpected, as semiclassics should fail<br />

when the area of the resonance island is comparable to ˝, cf. Eq. (82). In this weak driv<strong>in</strong>g regime,<br />

the pendulum approximation can be used to produce more accurate estimates of the energy levels.<br />

The fast (Î; ˆ ) motion is essentially identical to the one of the 1D <strong>driven</strong> hydrogen atom: thus,<br />

the Mathieu approach used <strong>in</strong> Section 3.3.1 can be trivially extended to the 3D case. The only<br />

amendment is to replace the factor J ′ 1 (1)n2 0<br />

<strong>in</strong> the expression of the Mathieu parameter q by the<br />

various quantized values of 1 for 0 6 p 6 n0 − 1; and to use the same Eq. (149) for the energy<br />

levels.<br />

The semiclassical construction of the energy levels from classical orbits is—necessarily—re ected<br />

<strong>in</strong> the localization properties of the associated eigenstates, as demonstrated by the electronic densities<br />

of the states |p =0〉, |p =10〉, and |p =20〉 <strong>in</strong> Fig. 23, for the same eld amplitudes as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 21.<br />

Note that, <strong>in</strong> this plot, the electronic densities are averaged over one eld cycle, hence display only<br />

the angular localization properties of the eigenstates. Their localization along the classical orbits

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!