23.03.2013 Views

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

452 A. Buchleitner et al. / Physics Reports 368 (2002) 409–547<br />

For a real 3D atom, this corresponds to driv<strong>in</strong>g the electron <strong>in</strong>itially prepared <strong>in</strong> a one-dimensional<br />

eccentricity one orbit along the polarization axis of the eld. In fact, it turns out that the one dimensionality<br />

of the dynamics is not stable under the external driv<strong>in</strong>g: the Kepler ellipse (with<br />

orientation xed <strong>in</strong> con guration space by the Runge–Lenz vector) slowly precesses o the eld<br />

polarization axis (see Sections 3.3.2 and 4.1). Thus, the 1D presentation which follows has mostly<br />

pedagogical value—be<strong>in</strong>g closest to the general case discussed later. However, a one-dimensional<br />

model allows to grasp essential features of the <strong>driven</strong> atomic dynamics and provides the simplest<br />

example for the creation of non-dispers<strong>in</strong>g <strong>wave</strong> <strong>packets</strong> by a near-resonant micro<strong>wave</strong> eld.<br />

A subsequent section will describe the dynamics of the real 3D atom under l<strong>in</strong>early polarized driv<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

and amend on the aws and drawbacks of the one-dimensional model.<br />

3.3.1. One-dimensional model<br />

From Eqs. (113) and (114), the Hamiltonian of the <strong>driven</strong> 1D atom reads<br />

H = p2<br />

2<br />

1<br />

− + Fz cos(!t); z¿0 : (137)<br />

z<br />

This has precisely the general form, Eq. (54), and we can therefore easily derive explicit expressions<br />

for the secular Hamiltonian subject to the semiclassical quantization conditions, Eqs. (76), (78) and<br />

(79), as well as for the <strong>quantum</strong> mechanical eigenenergies, Eq. (102), <strong>in</strong> the pendulum approximation.<br />

With the Fourier expansion, Eq. (54), and identify<strong>in</strong>g and V (p; z) <strong>in</strong> Eq. (120) with F and z <strong>in</strong><br />

Eq. (137), respectively, the Fourier coe cients <strong>in</strong> Eq. (55) take the explicit form<br />

V0 = 3<br />

2 I 2 ; Vm = −I 2 J ′ m(m)<br />

; m=0 : (138)<br />

m<br />

The resonant action—which de nes the position of the resonance island <strong>in</strong> Fig. 8—is given by<br />

Eq. (135). In a <strong>quantum</strong> description, the resonant action co<strong>in</strong>cides with the resonant pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>quantum</strong><br />

number:<br />

n0 = Î 1 = ! −1=3 ; (139)<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce the Maslov <strong>in</strong>dex vanishes <strong>in</strong> 1D, see Section 3.2, and ˝ ≡ 1 <strong>in</strong> atomic units. The resonant<br />

coupl<strong>in</strong>g is then given by<br />

V1 = −Î 2 J ′ 1(1) (140)<br />

and the secular Hamiltonian, Eq. (64), reads<br />

Hsec = ˆPt − 1<br />

2Î 2 − !Î − J ′ 1(1)Î 2 F cos ˆ : (141)<br />

This Hamiltonian has the standard form of a secular Hamiltonian with a resonance island centered<br />

around<br />

Î = Î 1 = ! −1=3 = n0; ˆ = ; (142)<br />

susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g librational motion with<strong>in</strong> its boundary.<br />

Those energy values of Hsec which de ne contour l<strong>in</strong>es (see Fig. 8) such that the contour <strong>in</strong>tegrals,<br />

Eqs. (78) and (79), lead to non-negative <strong>in</strong>teger values of N , are the semiclassical quasienergies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!