Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems
Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems
Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
452 A. Buchleitner et al. / Physics Reports 368 (2002) 409–547<br />
For a real 3D atom, this corresponds to driv<strong>in</strong>g the electron <strong>in</strong>itially prepared <strong>in</strong> a one-dimensional<br />
eccentricity one orbit along the polarization axis of the eld. In fact, it turns out that the one dimensionality<br />
of the dynamics is not stable under the external driv<strong>in</strong>g: the Kepler ellipse (with<br />
orientation xed <strong>in</strong> con guration space by the Runge–Lenz vector) slowly precesses o the eld<br />
polarization axis (see Sections 3.3.2 and 4.1). Thus, the 1D presentation which follows has mostly<br />
pedagogical value—be<strong>in</strong>g closest to the general case discussed later. However, a one-dimensional<br />
model allows to grasp essential features of the <strong>driven</strong> atomic dynamics and provides the simplest<br />
example for the creation of non-dispers<strong>in</strong>g <strong>wave</strong> <strong>packets</strong> by a near-resonant micro<strong>wave</strong> eld.<br />
A subsequent section will describe the dynamics of the real 3D atom under l<strong>in</strong>early polarized driv<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
and amend on the aws and drawbacks of the one-dimensional model.<br />
3.3.1. One-dimensional model<br />
From Eqs. (113) and (114), the Hamiltonian of the <strong>driven</strong> 1D atom reads<br />
H = p2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
− + Fz cos(!t); z¿0 : (137)<br />
z<br />
This has precisely the general form, Eq. (54), and we can therefore easily derive explicit expressions<br />
for the secular Hamiltonian subject to the semiclassical quantization conditions, Eqs. (76), (78) and<br />
(79), as well as for the <strong>quantum</strong> mechanical eigenenergies, Eq. (102), <strong>in</strong> the pendulum approximation.<br />
With the Fourier expansion, Eq. (54), and identify<strong>in</strong>g and V (p; z) <strong>in</strong> Eq. (120) with F and z <strong>in</strong><br />
Eq. (137), respectively, the Fourier coe cients <strong>in</strong> Eq. (55) take the explicit form<br />
V0 = 3<br />
2 I 2 ; Vm = −I 2 J ′ m(m)<br />
; m=0 : (138)<br />
m<br />
The resonant action—which de nes the position of the resonance island <strong>in</strong> Fig. 8—is given by<br />
Eq. (135). In a <strong>quantum</strong> description, the resonant action co<strong>in</strong>cides with the resonant pr<strong>in</strong>cipal <strong>quantum</strong><br />
number:<br />
n0 = Î 1 = ! −1=3 ; (139)<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce the Maslov <strong>in</strong>dex vanishes <strong>in</strong> 1D, see Section 3.2, and ˝ ≡ 1 <strong>in</strong> atomic units. The resonant<br />
coupl<strong>in</strong>g is then given by<br />
V1 = −Î 2 J ′ 1(1) (140)<br />
and the secular Hamiltonian, Eq. (64), reads<br />
Hsec = ˆPt − 1<br />
2Î 2 − !Î − J ′ 1(1)Î 2 F cos ˆ : (141)<br />
This Hamiltonian has the standard form of a secular Hamiltonian with a resonance island centered<br />
around<br />
Î = Î 1 = ! −1=3 = n0; ˆ = ; (142)<br />
susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g librational motion with<strong>in</strong> its boundary.<br />
Those energy values of Hsec which de ne contour l<strong>in</strong>es (see Fig. 8) such that the contour <strong>in</strong>tegrals,<br />
Eqs. (78) and (79), lead to non-negative <strong>in</strong>teger values of N , are the semiclassical quasienergies