23.03.2013 Views

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

428 A. Buchleitner et al. / Physics Reports 368 (2002) 409–547<br />

<br />

I2 = n2 + 2<br />

4<br />

<br />

˝ ; (45)<br />

where n1;n2 are two non-negative <strong>in</strong>tegers, and 1; 2 the Maslov <strong>in</strong>dices (count<strong>in</strong>g the number of<br />

caustics encountered on the torus) along the 1; 2 directions. Once aga<strong>in</strong>, the semiclassical energy<br />

levels (which now depend on two <strong>quantum</strong> numbers) are obta<strong>in</strong>ed by substitution of these quantized<br />

values <strong>in</strong>to the classical Hamilton function.<br />

An alternative formulation of the EBK criterium is possible us<strong>in</strong>g the orig<strong>in</strong>al position-momentum<br />

coord<strong>in</strong>ates. Indeed, Eq. (45) just expresses that, along any closed loop on the <strong>in</strong>variant torus,<br />

the phase accumulated by the <strong>wave</strong> function is an <strong>in</strong>teger multiple of 2 (modulo the Maslov<br />

contribution). Us<strong>in</strong>g the canonical <strong>in</strong>variance of the total action [77], the EBK quantization conditions<br />

can be written as<br />

<br />

1<br />

<br />

˜p:d˜r = ni +<br />

2 closed path i<br />

i<br />

<br />

˝ (46)<br />

4<br />

where the <strong>in</strong>tegral has to be taken along two topologically <strong>in</strong>dependent closed paths ( 1; 2) onthe<br />

<strong>in</strong>variant torus.<br />

Note that, as opposed to the WKB procedure <strong>in</strong> a 1D situation, the EBK quantization uses the<br />

<strong>in</strong>variant tori of the classical dynamics, not the trajectories themselves. When there is a stable<br />

periodic orbit, it is surrounded by <strong>in</strong>variant tori. The smallest quantized torus around the stable orbit<br />

is associated with a <strong>quantum</strong> number equal to zero for the motion transverse to the orbit: it de nes<br />

a narrow tube around the orbit, whose projection on con guration space will be localized <strong>in</strong> the<br />

immediate vic<strong>in</strong>ity of the orbit. Thus, the correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>wave</strong> function will also be localized close<br />

to this narrow tube, i.e., along the stable periodic orbit <strong>in</strong> con guration space. Transversely to the<br />

orbit, the <strong>wave</strong> function (or the Wigner function) will essentially look like the ground state of an<br />

harmonic oscillator, i.e., like a Gaussian.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, let us note that it is also possible to develop an analogous EBK scheme for <strong>periodically</strong><br />

time-dependent Hamiltonians [80] us<strong>in</strong>g the notion of an extended phase space [3]. Such an approach<br />

will be extensively used <strong>in</strong> the next section, so it is discussed <strong>in</strong> detail there.<br />

2.3. Scars<br />

When a periodic orbit is unstable, there is no torus closely surround<strong>in</strong>g it. However, it often<br />

happens that <strong>quantum</strong> eigenstates exhibit an <strong>in</strong>creased probability density <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of unstable<br />

periodic orbits. This scarr<strong>in</strong>g phenomenon is nowadays relatively well understood, and the <strong>in</strong>terested<br />

reader may consult Refs. [81,82].<br />

Similarly, some <strong>quantum</strong> states have an <strong>in</strong>creased probability density <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of an unstable<br />

equilibrium po<strong>in</strong>t [33,83,84]. This localization is only partial. Indeed, s<strong>in</strong>ce a <strong>quantum</strong> eigenstate is<br />

a stationary structure, some probability density must localize along the unstable directions of the<br />

classical Hamiltonian ow [77], and the localization cannot be perfect. This is <strong>in</strong> sharp contrast with<br />

stable equilibrium po<strong>in</strong>ts and stable periodic orbits which—see above—optimally support localized<br />

eigenstates.<br />

Note that there is, however, a big di erence between scarr<strong>in</strong>g and localization <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of<br />

an unstable xed po<strong>in</strong>t. The latter phenomenon is of purely classical orig<strong>in</strong>. Indeed, close to an<br />

equilibrium po<strong>in</strong>t, the velocity goes to zero and the particle consequently spends more time close to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!