23.03.2013 Views

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

532 A. Buchleitner et al. / Physics Reports 368 (2002) 409–547<br />

8.1. Experimental status<br />

The theoretical <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teraction of Rydberg states of atomic hydrogen with low-frequency<br />

electromagnetic elds has been triggered by early experiments [135] which showed a surpris<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

e cient excitation and subsequent ionization of the atoms by the eld. More precisely, a micro<strong>wave</strong><br />

eld of frequency ! comparable to the energy di erence between the <strong>in</strong>itial atomic state and its<br />

nearest neighbor was observed to <strong>in</strong>duce appreciable ionization, for atom– eld <strong>in</strong>teraction times<br />

of approx. 100 driv<strong>in</strong>g eld cycles, and for eld amplitudes beyond a certa<strong>in</strong> threshold value (of<br />

the order of 5–10% of the Coulomb eld experienced by the Rydberg electron on its unperturbed<br />

Kepler orbit). This threshold behavior of the ionization probability as a function of the driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

eld amplitude rather than of the driv<strong>in</strong>g frequency—<strong>in</strong> apparent contradiction to the photo-e ect—<br />

motivated a theoretical analysis of the classical dynamics of the Rydberg electron under external<br />

driv<strong>in</strong>g. It turned out that the ionization threshold marks the transition from regular to chaotic<br />

classical dynamics of the <strong>driven</strong> electron [197].<br />

The micro<strong>wave</strong> ionization of atomic Rydberg states was thus identi ed as an experimental test<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ground for <strong>quantum</strong> transport under the conditions of classically mixed regular chaotic dynamics,<br />

where the transport was simply measured by the experimentally observed ionization yield, or—with<br />

some additional experimental e ort—by the time-dependent redistribution of the atomic population<br />

over the bound states [198–201]. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the precise value of the scaled frequency !0—the<br />

ratio of the micro<strong>wave</strong> frequency ! to the Kepler frequency Kepler of the <strong>in</strong>itially excited Rydberg<br />

atom, Eq. (134)—of the driv<strong>in</strong>g eld, theory soon predicted essentially “classical” ionization yields<br />

(!0 ¡ 1:0), or some <strong>quantum</strong> suppression of chaotic ionization (!0 ¿ 1:0) [202], mediated by the<br />

<strong>quantum</strong> mechanical <strong>in</strong>terference e ect known as dynamical localization, analogous to Anderson<br />

localization <strong>in</strong> the electronic transport through disordered solids [203–208]. The physical process<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> chaotic ionization is classically determ<strong>in</strong>istic di usion, therefore essentially statistical <strong>in</strong><br />

nature, and <strong>in</strong>sensitive to the details of the transport process. Correspond<strong>in</strong>gly, the mere ionization<br />

probability condenses all details of the ionization process <strong>in</strong> one s<strong>in</strong>gle number, without reveal<strong>in</strong>g<br />

details on <strong>in</strong>dividual local structures <strong>in</strong> phase space. It re ects the statistical characteristics of the<br />

excitation process, rather than the population of some well de ned <strong>in</strong>dividual atomic states <strong>in</strong> its<br />

course [43,145]. Hence, state-of-the-art experiments are “bl<strong>in</strong>d” for the details of the atomic excitation<br />

process on the way to ionization, and therefore not suitable for the unambiguous identi cation of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual eigenstates of the atom <strong>in</strong> the eld, notably of non-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong> <strong>packets</strong>. The case<br />

is gett<strong>in</strong>g worse with additional complications which are unavoidable <strong>in</strong> a real experiment, such<br />

as the unprecise de nition of the <strong>in</strong>itial state the atoms are prepared <strong>in</strong> [133,137,209–216], the<br />

experimental uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty on the envelope of the amplitude of the driv<strong>in</strong>g eld experienced by the<br />

atoms as they enter the <strong>in</strong>teraction region with the micro<strong>wave</strong> (typically, a micro<strong>wave</strong> cavity or<br />

<strong>wave</strong> guide) [200,211,217], stray electric elds due to contact potentials <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teraction region,<br />

and nally uncontrolled noise sources which may a ect the coherence e ects <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the <strong>quantum</strong><br />

mechanical transport process [218]. On the other hand, <strong>in</strong>dependent experiments on the micro<strong>wave</strong><br />

ionization of Rydberg states of atomic hydrogen [132,137], as well as on hydrogenic <strong>in</strong>itial states<br />

of lithium [217], did <strong>in</strong>deed provide hard evidence for the relative stability of the atom aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

ionization when <strong>driven</strong> by a resonant eld of scaled frequency !0 1:0. Furthermore, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

hydrogen experiments, this stability was observed to be <strong>in</strong>sensitive to the polarization of the driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

eld, be it l<strong>in</strong>ear, circular or elliptical [134]. These experimental nd<strong>in</strong>gs suggest that some atomic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!