Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems
Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems
Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A. Buchleitner et al. / Physics Reports 368 (2002) 409–547 525<br />
becomes dom<strong>in</strong>ant, s<strong>in</strong>ce its <strong>in</strong>tensity scales as ! 5=3 , while the <strong>in</strong>tensities of the other two components<br />
are proportional to ! 2 , i.e., are typically weaker by a factor n0 = ! −1=3 . This implies that the<br />
non-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong> packet decays exclusively (<strong>in</strong> the harmonic approximation) to its immediate<br />
neighbor states, emitt<strong>in</strong>g a photon with frequency <strong>in</strong> the micro<strong>wave</strong> range, comparable to the driv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
frequency. Direct decay to the atomic |n =1;L= M =0〉 ground state or to weakly excited states<br />
of the system is forbidden by the selection rules of the dipole operator. This is easily understood:<br />
the CP non-<strong>dispersive</strong> ground state <strong>wave</strong> packet |0; 0; 0〉 is built essentially from states with large<br />
angular momentum (of the order of n0), and as it can lose only one unit of angular momentum per<br />
spontaneous emission event, it can decay only to similar states. When the harmonic approximation<br />
breaks down, additional l<strong>in</strong>es may appear, but, for the same reason, <strong>in</strong> the micro<strong>wave</strong> range only.<br />
Another important observation is that the <strong>in</strong>elastic component at ! + !− is by far stronger than<br />
the one at ! − !+. This is entirely due to the cubic power of the transition frequency enter<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
expression for the rate (271). Note the sign di erence, due to the sign di erence between ± modes<br />
<strong>in</strong> the harmonic Hamiltonian, Eq. (197).<br />
In the semiclassical limit ! = n −3<br />
0 → 0, the decay is dom<strong>in</strong>ated by the elastic component, and the<br />
total decay rate is [68]<br />
= 2 3 ! 5=3 q −2=3<br />
3<br />
; (272)<br />
when, multiplied by the energy ! of the spontaneous photon, gives the energy loss due to spontaneous<br />
emission:<br />
dE<br />
dt = 2 3 ! 8=3q−2=3 =<br />
3<br />
2 3 ! 4 |xeq| 2<br />
;<br />
3<br />
(273)<br />
where we used Eq. (186). This is noth<strong>in</strong>g but the result obta<strong>in</strong>ed from classical electrodynamics [190]<br />
for a po<strong>in</strong>t charge mov<strong>in</strong>g on a circular orbit of radius |xeq| with frequency !. S<strong>in</strong>ce the charge loses<br />
energy, it cannot survive on a circular orbit and would eventually fall onto the nucleus follow<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
spiral trajectory. This model stimulated Bohr’s orig<strong>in</strong>al formulation of <strong>quantum</strong> mechanics. Let us<br />
notice that the non-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong> packet is the rst physical realization of the Bohr model. There<br />
is no net loss of energy s<strong>in</strong>ce, <strong>in</strong> our case, the electron is <strong>driven</strong> by the micro<strong>wave</strong> eld and an<br />
emission at frequency ! occurs <strong>in</strong> fact as an elastic scatter<strong>in</strong>g of a micro<strong>wave</strong> photon. Thus the<br />
non-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong> packet is a cure of the long-last<strong>in</strong>g Bohr paradox.<br />
Fig. 56 shows the square of the dipole matrix elements connect<strong>in</strong>g the non-<strong>dispersive</strong> <strong>wave</strong> packet,<br />
for n0 = 60 (i.e., micro<strong>wave</strong> frequency ! =1=603 ) and scaled micro<strong>wave</strong> eld F0 =0:04446, to other<br />
Floquet states with lower energy. These are the results of an exact numerical diagonalization of the<br />
full Floquet Hamiltonian. They are presented as a stick spectrum because the widths of the important<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es are very narrow on the scale of the gure, which is given as a function of the energy di erence<br />
between the <strong>in</strong>itial and the nal state, that is the frequency of the scattered photon. Thus, this gure<br />
shows the l<strong>in</strong>es that could be observed when record<strong>in</strong>g the photoabsorption of a weak micro<strong>wave</strong><br />
probe eld. As expected, there is a dom<strong>in</strong>ant l<strong>in</strong>e at the frequency ! of the micro<strong>wave</strong>, and two other<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es at frequencies !−!− and !+!+ with comparable <strong>in</strong>tensities, while all other l<strong>in</strong>es are at least<br />
10 times weaker. This means that the harmonic approximation works here very well; its predictions,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicated by the crosses <strong>in</strong> the gure, are <strong>in</strong> good quantitative agreement with the exact result (apart<br />
from t<strong>in</strong>y shifts recognizable <strong>in</strong> the gure, which correspond to the mismatch between the exact