23.03.2013 Views

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

Non-dispersive wave packets in periodically driven quantum systems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

512 A. Buchleitner et al. / Physics Reports 368 (2002) 409–547<br />

Fig. 49. Electronic densities of the eigenstates of the upmost doublet states (top) of the n0 = 42 manifold of Fig. 46,<br />

and of their mirror states (bottom), shifted <strong>in</strong> energy by !=2 (Fig. 47), at driv<strong>in</strong>g eld phase !t = 0. The longitud<strong>in</strong>al<br />

localization on the Kepler ellipses (similar for all states) is apparent. On each ellipse, four di erent <strong>in</strong>dividual <strong>wave</strong><br />

<strong>packets</strong> (or rather, due to azimuthal symmetry, two doughnut <strong>wave</strong> <strong>packets</strong>) can be dist<strong>in</strong>guished, propagat<strong>in</strong>g along the<br />

Kepler ellipse. Notice the phase shift of <strong>in</strong> the temporal evolution on the two ellipses, implied by z-<strong>in</strong>version. The<br />

micro<strong>wave</strong> polarization axis along z is given by the vertical axis of the gure, with the nucleus at the center of the<br />

gure.<br />

longitud<strong>in</strong>ally delocalized because of the time average. In fact, there are four such Floquet states<br />

display<strong>in</strong>g very similar electronic densities. These are the energetically highest doublet <strong>in</strong> the n0 =42<br />

manifold, and the upmost doublet <strong>in</strong> the “mirror” manifold displayed <strong>in</strong> Fig. 47.<br />

Fig. 49 shows the electronic densities of these four Floquet eigenstates at phase !t = 0 of the<br />

driv<strong>in</strong>g eld: the four doughnuts are now clearly visible, as well as the orbital and radial localizations<br />

along the two elliptic trajectories. Very much <strong>in</strong> the same way as for a double well potential (or<br />

for the bouncer discussed <strong>in</strong> Section 5.2, compare Fig. 41), a l<strong>in</strong>ear comb<strong>in</strong>ation of these four states<br />

allows for the selection of one s<strong>in</strong>gle doughnut, localized along one s<strong>in</strong>gle classical Kepler ellipse.<br />

This <strong>wave</strong> packet then evolves along this trajectory without dispersion, as demonstrated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 50.<br />

Note, however, that this s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>wave</strong>-packet is not a s<strong>in</strong>gle Floquet state, and thus does not exactly<br />

repeat itself <strong>periodically</strong>. It slowly disappears at long times, for at least two reasons: rstly, because<br />

of longitud<strong>in</strong>al and transverse tunnel<strong>in</strong>g, the phases of the four Floquet eigenstates accumulate<br />

small di erences as time evolves, what <strong>in</strong>duces complicated oscillations between the four possible<br />

locations of the <strong>wave</strong>-packet, and secondly, the ionization rates of the <strong>in</strong>dividual Floquet states<br />

lead to ionization and loss of phase coherence, especially if the ionization rates (see Section 7.1)<br />

of the four states are not equal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!