OTRAG Rocket.pdf

injector for the engine and you are excited about the concept. However, you want to try it
with hydrogen peroxide / kerosene, a fuel combination that is not much better than nitric
acid / kerosene is for a low density, so more of a step backwards as progress.
Test of InterpribtalIm 2008, the company announced interorbital that Kayser she advises
on the drive technology. Your new class of "Neptune" missile uses the OTRAG engines
and the module concept, where the published data can recognize this. There are only
minor changes. So now is the shape of the rocket cloverleaf-shaped and the first stage is
discarded in the form of external beams. The second and third stages now seem to exhibit
real jets. The thrust lies in the region where one was already in the OTRAG: 6000
pounds, about 27 kN. Videos show test runs (though only about 9 seconds burn time) and
a start of a CRM configuration 8offensichtlich in 6 m), with this tendency, but from the
start itself. Whether this is intentional or not is hard to say. Again, the module was
burning only a few seconds.
It seems to have been considerably increased the payload - A 33 CPMR carrier "Neptune
1000" added a payload of 1,000 kg into a polar orbit - was needed to OTRAG times to
even 64 modules. There is now four stages (first stage of 24 modules, six second. Two as
a third and a module as the fourth stage. Thus the company hopes to win the Google
Lunar X-Price. A larger model "Neptune 4000" will be tourists for 5 bring millions of
dollars for a week in space. If you are fast can secure a ticket for the spot price of $
250,000!
What failed the OTRAG?
The OTRAG was a pioneer of private rocket construction and also shows how to do it.
On the technical concept
On that opinions are divided. Some think it's awesome, others believe that not enough
power to carry a payload into orbit.