22.03.2013 Views

OTRAG Rocket.pdf

OTRAG Rocket.pdf

OTRAG Rocket.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Level 3: 8 x CPMR (2x4 square)<br />

Level 2: 24 x CPMR (+8 = 32 CPMR CPMR = 4x8 rectangle)<br />

Level 1: 96 x CPMR (+24 CPMR CPMR = 128 = 8x16 rectangle)<br />

This missile would be 4.8x2.4 m wide at a height of 24 m. It has also been considered to<br />

extend the outer ring by 3 m in order to form the payload space. These engines would<br />

then burn 15 seconds longer. In later approaches you have rejected this idea again.<br />

The rapidly increasing width of the rocket and the bundling of many engines should<br />

provide an additional ideas to Lutz Kayser back fabric. As described, the nozzle end<br />

shortly after the combustion chamber, so that the gases at the nozzle exit, very little<br />

energy has been transferred to the rocket. Up of many engines connecting gas flows and<br />

accumulate it comes to a further rebound in order to increase the specific impulse for<br />

Kayser detail by 10-12%.<br />

The following standard versions were being considered (payload for a 200 km high orbit<br />

LEO)<br />

Total number of CPMR payload launch mass Level 1 Level 2 Level 3<br />

64 1 t 100 t 48 12 4<br />

T 200 t 128 2 96 24 8<br />

256 4 t 400 t 192 48 16<br />

512 8 t 800 t 384 96 32<br />

1024 16 t 1600 t 768 192 64<br />

The payload data refer to a low Earth orbit. The payload for the GTO orbit betrugNo text<br />

about 40% of it and the payload for the GSO orbit about 20% of them (this would be<br />

roughly the payload to Venus or Mars). A 200-ton rocket with 128 modules, so the<br />

payload would have had a Delta 3914, the standard model of the time, and a version with<br />

256 modules would be something worse than an Atlas-Centaur or Ariane 1 was.<br />

Mr. Kayser I first gave values of 24 m module, and when I complained inconsistencies,<br />

new data, which differed in the thrust and burn time of the first substantially. I have<br />

therefore both separately identified by a "/". Here, the data of a 24 m long module<br />

consists of a tank and an engine. This length would have been provided for an orbital<br />

version.<br />

Length 25 m<br />

Diameter 0:27 m<br />

Tank mass of 100 kg<br />

Engine 65 kg<br />

at the end of firing 50 kg<br />

Push the start 35 kN / 25 kN<br />

Thrust at the end of firing 15 kN / 15 kN<br />

Burn time 150 sec / 120 sec<br />

Oxidizer HDA 1130 kg<br />

Filling 66%<br />

Oxidizer length 18 m

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!