Comparing IELTS and Cambridge English: Advanced ... - UK Naric

Comparing IELTS and Cambridge English: Advanced ... - UK Naric Comparing IELTS and Cambridge English: Advanced ... - UK Naric

<strong>Comparing</strong> <strong>IELTS</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>English</strong>: <strong>Advanced</strong><br />

c<strong>and</strong>idates<br />

Presented by Nicola Johnson <strong>and</strong> Dr Andy Blackhurst


2<br />

Overview<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> ESOL – Who we are<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>English</strong>: <strong>Advanced</strong><br />

<strong>Comparing</strong> <strong>IELTS</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>English</strong>:<br />

<strong>Advanced</strong>


3<br />

About <strong>Cambridge</strong> ESOL<br />

Not-for-profit department of the University of <strong>Cambridge</strong><br />

Part of the <strong>Cambridge</strong> Assessment Group, Europe’s largest<br />

assessment agency<br />

150 years of assessment experience <strong>and</strong> world leaders in language<br />

assessment<br />

Offer a comprehensive range of high quality <strong>English</strong> language<br />

exams in 130 countries since 1913<br />

One of the largest dedicated language research teams in the<br />

world


Over 3 million c<strong>and</strong>idates per year take <strong>Cambridge</strong><br />

<strong>English</strong> exams<br />

Global network of 2,700 test centres in over 130<br />

countries<br />

Accepted by over 12,000 organisations globally<br />

Over 50,000 schools globally offering preparation<br />

courses for our exams<br />

4


The CEFR describes Level C1 as the level at<br />

which learners “can use language flexibly <strong>and</strong><br />

effectively for social, academic <strong>and</strong><br />

professional purposes”.<br />

Source: Common European Framework of Reference for<br />

Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR) -<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press (ISBN : HB 0521803136 - PB 0521005310)<br />

6<br />

The right level for higher education


7<br />

Benefits of using <strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>English</strong>:<br />

<strong>Advanced</strong><br />

Valid <strong>and</strong> Reliable<br />

Fit for purpose<br />

Enhanced security<br />

Proven quality<br />

Flexible <strong>and</strong> well supported<br />

International <strong>and</strong> fair


8<br />

Internationally recognised<br />

Recognised by over 2,800 universities,<br />

employers <strong>and</strong> governments worldwide,<br />

including:


9<br />

Recognition in the <strong>UK</strong><br />

Accepted for university <strong>and</strong> college<br />

application<br />

Approved by the <strong>UK</strong> Border Agency for<br />

student visas<br />

UCAS awards c<strong>and</strong>idates with Grade A<br />

70 UCAS points towards their application<br />

to university


10<br />

Recognition in Australia<br />

Approved by the Australian Government for<br />

student visas<br />

Accepted by nearly 50 universities <strong>and</strong> TAFE<br />

institutions


11<br />

For more information<br />

www.<strong>Cambridge</strong>ESOL.org/<strong>Advanced</strong><br />

www.Facebook.org/<strong>Cambridge</strong>CAE<br />

Email <strong>Cambridge</strong>.Recognition@<strong>Cambridge</strong>ESOL.org


<strong>Comparing</strong> <strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>English</strong>:<br />

<strong>Advanced</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>IELTS</strong> c<strong>and</strong>idates


Dictionary of Language Testing<br />

Test equivalence<br />

2. The relationship between two different<br />

tests. Strictly speaking, this concept is<br />

unjustifiable, since each test is designed<br />

for a different purpose <strong>and</strong> a different<br />

population <strong>and</strong> may view <strong>and</strong> assess<br />

language traits in different ways as well as<br />

describing test-taker performance<br />

differently. (Weir, et al, 1999)


CEFR- derives from<br />

3 “conventional” learning levels<br />

A B C<br />

Basic User Independent User Proficient User<br />

A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2<br />

Breakthrough Waystage Threshold Vantage Effective Mastery<br />

Operational<br />

Proficiency


Origins of the CEFR<br />

“The CEFR levels (A1-C2) did not suddenly appear from<br />

nowhere. They have emerged in a gradual, collective<br />

process that started in 1913 with the <strong>Cambridge</strong><br />

Proficiency exam (CPE) that defines a practical mastery<br />

of the language as a non-native speaker. This level has<br />

become C2. Just before the last war, <strong>Cambridge</strong><br />

introduced the First Certificate (FCE) – still widely seen<br />

as the first level of proficiency of interest for office work,<br />

now associated with B2. In the 1970s the Council of<br />

Europe defined a lower level called “The Threshold<br />

Level” (now B1)…”<br />

(North 2006: 8 Paper presented to the Intergovernmental Language Policy Forum « The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages<br />

(CEFR) <strong>and</strong> the development of language policies: challenges <strong>and</strong> responsibilities» Strasbourg, 6-8 February 2007)


<strong>Cambridge</strong> ESOL exams<br />

<strong>and</strong> the CEFR CPE<br />

Flyers<br />

Movers C2<br />

Starters<br />

Beg-A2<br />

Breakthrough<br />

Level<br />

KET<br />

A2<br />

1988<br />

Council of<br />

Europe<br />

Waystage<br />

level<br />

PET<br />

B1<br />

1981<br />

Council of<br />

Europe<br />

Threshold<br />

level<br />

FCE<br />

B2<br />

1939<br />

Council of<br />

Europe<br />

Vantage<br />

level<br />

CAE<br />

C1<br />

1991<br />

Effective<br />

Operational<br />

Proficiency<br />

level<br />

C2<br />

1913<br />

Mastery<br />

level


B2 level?<br />

– Can underst<strong>and</strong> the main ideas of complex<br />

text on concrete <strong>and</strong> abstract topics,<br />

including technical discussions in own<br />

field of specialisation.<br />

– Can interact with a degree of fluency <strong>and</strong><br />

spontaneity that makes regular interaction<br />

with native speakers quite possible without<br />

strain for either party.<br />

– Can produce clear, detailed text on a wide<br />

range of subjects <strong>and</strong> explain a viewpoint on<br />

a topical issue giving the advantages <strong>and</strong><br />

disadvantages of various options.


Or C1 level?<br />

– Can underst<strong>and</strong> a wide range of dem<strong>and</strong>ing,<br />

longer texts, <strong>and</strong> recognise implicit meaning.<br />

– Can express him/herself fluently <strong>and</strong><br />

spontaneously without much obvious searching<br />

for expressions.<br />

– Can use language flexibly <strong>and</strong> effectively for<br />

social, academic <strong>and</strong> professional purposes.<br />

– Can produce clear, well-structured, detailed text<br />

on complex subjects, showing controlled use of<br />

organisational patterns, connectors <strong>and</strong><br />

cohesive devices.


C1<br />

The written <strong>and</strong> spoken texts encountered in most common<br />

everyday situations can be dealt with at a level below that<br />

reached by the C1 learner, but certain more difficult<br />

situations, e.g. discussing abstract or cultural topics with a<br />

good degree of fluency, dem<strong>and</strong> this level of language.<br />

Examinations at level C1 may be used as proof of the level<br />

of language necessary to work at a managerial or<br />

professional level or follow a course of academic study<br />

at university level<br />

http://www.alte.org/alteframework/level4.php


The Level – relating results to<br />

the CEFR


Statement of Results


<strong>IELTS</strong><br />

Specifically developed as a test for<br />

University entry<br />

So “<strong>English</strong> for Specific Purposes” versus<br />

“General <strong>English</strong>”?<br />

Has own bespoke rating scale


The <strong>IELTS</strong> 9 b<strong>and</strong> scale:<br />

9 expert user<br />

8 very good user<br />

7 good user<br />

6 competent user<br />

5 modest user<br />

4 limited user<br />

3 extremely limited user<br />

2 intermittent user<br />

1 non-user


ALTE “Can do” Project<br />

(Jones:2000)<br />

Mean self-rating (logits)<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

C<br />

FCE<br />

B<br />

FCE<br />

A<br />

FCE<br />

Can-do Self-ratings <strong>and</strong> grades<br />

C<br />

CAE<br />

B<br />

CAE<br />

A<br />

CAE<br />

4<br />

<strong>IELTS</strong><br />

5<br />

<strong>IELTS</strong><br />

6<br />

<strong>IELTS</strong><br />

7<br />

<strong>IELTS</strong><br />

8<br />

<strong>IELTS</strong><br />

9<br />

<strong>IELTS</strong>


Relating <strong>IELTS</strong> performances to CEFR<br />

C1 level: Panel judgements for Writing<br />

Initial <strong>and</strong> revised recommended average cut scores to the<br />

nearest half b<strong>and</strong> score for writing.<br />

Round B2/C1<br />

Initial 6.0<br />

Revised 6.5<br />

Since a C grade on CAE represents CEFR “C1” level, this project indicated that<br />

CAE c<strong>and</strong>idates at grade C would be at a similar level to c<strong>and</strong>idates securing<br />

6.5 on <strong>IELTS</strong>


Relating <strong>IELTS</strong> performances to CEFR C1<br />

level: Panel judgements for Speaking<br />

Initial <strong>and</strong> revised recommended average cut scores to the<br />

nearest half b<strong>and</strong> score for speaking.<br />

Round B2/C1<br />

Initial 6.5<br />

Revised 7.0<br />

Since a C grade pass on CAE = CEFR “C1” level, this also indicated that CAE<br />

c<strong>and</strong>idates at grade C would be at a similar level to those securing 6.5 on<br />

<strong>IELTS</strong>


Empirical evidence for<br />

comparing CAE <strong>and</strong> <strong>IELTS</strong><br />

scores<br />

<strong>IELTS</strong>/CAE linking study 2010 based on 186 c<strong>and</strong>idates<br />

who either took <strong>IELTS</strong> modules in addition to CAE, or<br />

CAE modules in addition to <strong>IELTS</strong>.<br />

Equipercentile linking with presmoothing, as described in<br />

Kolen <strong>and</strong> Brennan (2004), was chosen as the analytic<br />

method for this study.


Linking study confirmed expectations re Writing <strong>and</strong><br />

Speaking but suggested CAE grade C c<strong>and</strong>idates were at<br />

a slightly higher level in Reading <strong>and</strong> Listening.<br />

CAE<br />

Paper<br />

Reading<br />

C cut score<br />

Listening<br />

C cut score<br />

Writing<br />

C cut score<br />

Speaking<br />

C cut score<br />

Indicative <strong>IELTS</strong> b<strong>and</strong><br />

7.0<br />

7.0<br />

6.5<br />

6.5


<strong>Comparing</strong> overall scores<br />

CAE <strong>IELTS</strong><br />

Overall<br />

Grade C cut<br />

Overall<br />

score 6.7<br />

67 7


<strong>Comparing</strong> <strong>IELTS</strong> to <strong>Advanced</strong><br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>English</strong>: <strong>Advanced</strong><br />

<strong>IELTS</strong> b<strong>and</strong> scores st<strong>and</strong>ardised score (1-100)<br />

8 80-86 (Grade A - 80)<br />

7.5 74-79 (Grade B - 75)<br />

7 67-73<br />

6.5 58-66 (Grade C - 60)<br />

6 52-57<br />

5.5 47-51


Thank you!<br />

Dr Andy Blackhurst<br />

Research <strong>and</strong> Validation Group<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> ESOL<br />

blackhurst.a@cambridgeesol.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!