AFTER VIOLENCE: 3R, RECONSTRUCTION, RECONCILIATION ...

The first model refers reconstruction to "developers",
reconciliation to theologians-psychologists, and resolution to
jurists-diplomats-politicians; all approaches to be discussed.
The second model would fuse the tasks into one, based on a
fundamental hypothesis: reconciliation can best take place when
the parties cooperate in resolution and reconstruction.
And this may also be where the road to peace is located, if
peace is defined as the capacity to handle conflicts with empathy,
nonviolence and creativity./5/ Capacity to handle conflict is a
major casualty of war. So let us look into that.
2. On Conflict/Violence/Peace Images
Violence must be seen in a context, and the context chosen is
"conflict". There are many misunderstandings and unfortunate
conceptions of conflict, that great Creator and great Destroyer.
A common discourse about conflict, in the media, among researchers
and people in general, conceives of conflict as an organism with
birth, growth to a turning point, and then a decline, till in the
end the conflict dies out. That discourse has quantitative time,
khronos, on the horizontal axis and on the vertical axis the level
of direct violence, from the first sign of "trouble" to "cease-
fire", the kairos points of time, in the qualitative sense. The
conflict may have "burnt out", the parties may coincide in their
prognosis about the outcome and find it useless to continue
destroying each other, or a third party has intervened, forcing
them to stop, or making them agree to stop. The end is then often
called "peace"/6/, a khronos flow.
A list of major shortcomings of this discourse includes:
8