AFTER VIOLENCE: 3R, RECONSTRUCTION, RECONCILIATION ...
AFTER VIOLENCE: 3R, RECONSTRUCTION, RECONCILIATION ...
AFTER VIOLENCE: 3R, RECONSTRUCTION, RECONCILIATION ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and property. Creativity in life-enhancement, in promoting Other,<br />
even "them", is also ruled out as treason.<br />
And the same applies to the third virtue: empathy, the<br />
capacity to understand Other from the inside; high treason. In<br />
doing so Other's behavior becomes a consequence of his history.<br />
External causes become good reasons. The will to kill "them" may<br />
be subverted. Non-war, even peace may be around the corner. The<br />
fact that we are around testifies to a lot of resolution capacity.<br />
And reconstruction. And reconciliation. How come?<br />
This will be taken up later. At this point, let us only<br />
conclude by asking a very naive question. Given all these<br />
negative effects of violence in general, and war in particular,<br />
how do we explain that human beings in their right mind<br />
nevertheless engage in so much violence?<br />
First, if by "right mind" we mean a "cost-benefit" mind, then<br />
we have left out the possible, expected, both in the sense of<br />
predicted and in the sense of hoped for, benefits to Self. They go<br />
far beyond booty, into reinforcing world power pyramids.<br />
Second, if by "cost-benefit mind" we mean egoistic cost-<br />
benefit, then Self has to wage war in such a way that benefits<br />
come to Self and costs to Other. Kill any number of enemy<br />
soldiers and civilians as long as your own are unscathed. To do<br />
this, maneuver so that the choice of time and place is yours.<br />
Third, who said human beings are necessarily in "their right<br />
mind", if by that we mean having the costs, including to Other,<br />
weigh more than benefits, including to Self? Something else may<br />
be running their minds, in addition to the cognitions of utilities<br />
and probabilities, their products and the sum thereof. That<br />
26