22.03.2013 Views

J. Seetharamulu.pmd

J. Seetharamulu.pmd

J. Seetharamulu.pmd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NSave Nature to Survive<br />

QUARTERLY<br />

6(1&2): 93-97, 2012<br />

93<br />

www.theecoscan.in<br />

EFFECT OF MEDICINAL PLANTS AND BIOFUNGICIDES ON<br />

DEFENSE ENZYME LEVELS AND DISEASE CONTROL IN<br />

MULBERRY<br />

J. SEETHARAMULU*, J. UMAMAHESHWARI 1 , A. SREERAMULU 1 , A. K. GOEL AND P. J. RAJU<br />

Andhra Pradesh State Sericulture Research and Development Institute,<br />

Kirikera - 515 211, Hindupur, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA<br />

1 Department of Biochemistry, Sri Krishnadevaraya University,<br />

Anantapur - 515 003, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA<br />

e-mail: sithara_jolapuram@rediffmail.com<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Mulberry (Morus alba L.) is one of the most important commercial crops grown<br />

extensively as food plant for the silkworm (Bombyx mori L.). Being a vegetatively<br />

propagated perennial crop, initial establishment of mulberry is affected by many<br />

soil borne fungal diseases namely stem canker and die-back caused by<br />

Botryodiplodia theobromae, cutting rot caused by Fusarium solani and collar rot<br />

caused by Phoma sorghina, Phoma mororum and Sclerotium rolfsii (Gupta et al.,<br />

1997) and cutting die-back caused by Alternaria tenuissima (Seetha et al., 2004<br />

& 2008). These diseases affect almost all the mulberry varieties cultivated in India.<br />

Chemical fungicides have been suggested for the effective control of mulberry<br />

diseases, but these chemicals could not get wide acceptance among sericulturists<br />

due to their prohibitive cost, possible toxicity to silkworm and various hazards to<br />

mankind and environment. The use of plant products and microbial agents for<br />

controlling the plant diseases is generally regarded as a potential and safe alternative<br />

to chemical fungicides. The plant kingdom represents an enormous reservoir of<br />

potential chemical compounds and also leads to an increase in the enzyme<br />

activity viz. peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase. Similarly the chemical<br />

compounds like phenols, alkaloids and primary metabolites also increased which<br />

it increases the resistance in plants. In the present study some efforts have been<br />

made in controlling the pathogens at nursery stage with an integration of plant<br />

extracts and bio-control agents.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

In vitro studies<br />

Medicinal plant extracts were tested against the mycelial growth of the pathogenic<br />

fungi viz. A. tenuissima and F. solani through poisoned food technique (McCallan,<br />

1947) under in vitro conditions. The plant extracts were prepared according to<br />

the method of Awuah, 1989. The results were expressed in terms of per cent<br />

inhibition of mycelium over control.<br />

The fungal antagonists viz, T. viride, T. harzianum and T. pseudokoningii and the<br />

bacterial antagonist P. fluorescens were tested against the A. tenuissima and F.<br />

solani by Dual culture technique (Hung and Hoes, 1976).<br />

In vivo studies<br />

To test the efficacy of promising plant extracts and bio-fungicides against the<br />

pathogenic fungi, five treatments with three bio-fungicides {T. viride (T 1 ), T.<br />

harzianum (T 2 ) and P. fluorescens (T 3 )}, two plants extracts {L. camara (T 4 ) P.<br />

juliflora (T 5 )} and one chemical fungicide (T 6 ) (Mancozeb) were used for conducting<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Medicinal plant extracts along with biofungicides<br />

were tested under in vitro to control<br />

the Fusarium solani and Alternaria tenuissima,<br />

the incitants of root rot and die-back diseases<br />

of mulberry. Plant extract of Prosopis juliflora<br />

showed maximum inhibition on the mycelial<br />

growth (above 80.0%) followed by L. camara<br />

(above 66.0%). Among the antagonists<br />

Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma<br />

viride showed maximum inhibition on the<br />

mycelial growth of both pathogenic fungi. The<br />

promising plant extracts (P. juliflora and L.<br />

camara) and antagonists (P. fluorescens and T.<br />

viride) were then tested against both the<br />

pathogenic fungi under in vivo along with<br />

popular chemical Mancozeb. Maximum<br />

survival percentage of mulberry cuttings was<br />

recorded in the treatment with T. viride and P.<br />

fluorescens (above 90%) followed by T.<br />

harzianum (above 80%) against both the<br />

pathogens. In case of plant extracts, P. juliflora<br />

recorded higher survival (above 55%) followed<br />

by L. camara (above 50%). Mancozeb recorded<br />

55 % survival. Whereas in control the survival<br />

was recorded 10 - 15% only. Alterations in<br />

the enzymatic activities due to infection of<br />

mulberry stem with A. tenuissima and F. solani<br />

were also evident.<br />

KEY WORDS<br />

Antagonists, Alternaria tenuissima<br />

Defence enzymes, Fusarium solani<br />

Mulberry nursery, Plant extracts<br />

Survivability<br />

Received : 17.11.2011<br />

Revised : 22.02.2012<br />

Accepted : 24.04.2012<br />

*Corresponding author


J. SEETHARAMULU et al.,<br />

the experiment under controlled conditions. Control pots<br />

were inoculated with the test fungi separately and left without<br />

treatment. All the treatments were given before planting the<br />

cutting in to the inoculated soil. The sterilized soil was used<br />

for inoculation.<br />

Inoculation<br />

The test fungi were grown in corn meal - sand medium for<br />

inoculation (Rangaswamy and Mahadevan, 2001). The 15<br />

days old culture incubated at 29 ± 1ºC of A. tenuissima and<br />

F. solani were used for inoculation of sterilized soil. The corn<br />

meal-sand culture of the A. tenuissima and F. solani was<br />

thoroughly mixed with sterilized soil separately at 10% level<br />

(w/w - 90g sterilized soil + 10g inoculum). Each of the test<br />

fungus was mixed with sterilized soil separately and poured<br />

in to polythene bags (1kg inoculated soil/bag). Later twenty<br />

cuttings were treated with each test bio-fungicide, plant<br />

products and Mancozeb separately and planted in the<br />

polythene bags (one cutting/bag). Twenty cuttings were<br />

maintained for each treatment and control. All the bags were<br />

watered on alternate days with sterilized water and kept in<br />

open condition.<br />

The cuttings were dipped in plant extracts of required<br />

concentration (L. camara at 100% and P. juliflora at 10%<br />

concentration) for half an hour and 100 mL of plant extract<br />

was added to the inoculated soil in the bag and planted the<br />

treated cuttings with plant extract. The talc based bio-fungicide<br />

was mixed with distilled water to form fine slurry and the<br />

cleaned mulberry cuttings were dipped in to the slurry for 30<br />

minutes and 10 g of bio-fungicide was added to each bag<br />

containing inoculated soil with test fungi and treated cuttings<br />

with bio-fungicide were planted in the bags. In case of chemical<br />

treatment the cuttings were dipped in 0.1% Mancozeb<br />

solution for 30 minutes and 100 ml of 0.1% Mancozeb<br />

solution is added to the inoculated bag and cuttings were<br />

planted. The disease index was observed and the survival<br />

percentage was calculated to each treatment and assessed<br />

their efficacy.<br />

Enzymatic studies<br />

The mulberry stem tissues from the all treatments and control<br />

bags were collected separately in to polythene bags at different<br />

intervals i.e. 15 th , 30 th , 45 th and 60 th day of plantation (Stage I,<br />

II, III and IV) and these samples were used for enzyme<br />

Table 1: Efficacy of plant extracts against the mycelial growth of A. tenuissima and F. solani under in vitro by poisoned food technique<br />

Botanical source A. tenuissima F. solani<br />

Mycelialgrowth (cm) Inhibition (%) Mycelialgrowth (cm) Inhibition (%)<br />

Prosopis juliflora, leaf 1.70 81.17 1.80 80.03<br />

Calotropis procera, leaf 3.80 57.80 3.60 60.03<br />

Annona squaimosa, seed 3.60 60.03 5.90 34.50<br />

Cassia occidentalis, leaf 7.00 22.27 7.60 15.60<br />

Ocimum sanctum, leaf 6.20 31.17 7.40 17.80<br />

Azadiracta indica , seed 3.40 62.30 6.90 23.40<br />

Eucalyptus globules, leaf 7.60 15.60 7.80 13.40<br />

Aloe vera, leaf 7.73 14.13 8.60 4.50<br />

Lantana camara, leaf 3.00 66.70 2.80 68.93<br />

Vinca rosea, leaf 7.90 12.27 4.10 54.50<br />

Mancozeb 0.40 95.56 0.60 93.33<br />

Control 9.00 — 9.00 —<br />

CD (P d” 0.05) 0.29 3.22 0.25 2.75<br />

94<br />

extraction. The small pieces (25g from each treatment and<br />

control) of the tissues were transferred to warring blender and<br />

added 100 mL of chilled Acetic acid-acetate buffer at pH 5.2<br />

blended for 10 minutes, filtered through two layers of<br />

cheesecloth and centrifuged at 2000 g at 35ºC for 20 minutes.<br />

The supernatant was collected in conical flask. The crude<br />

enzyme in the flask was used for the measurement of<br />

endoglucanase (β-1, 3-glucanase) activity. This enzyme extract<br />

was stored at 2-4ºC by adding a few drops of tolune for later<br />

use (Aneja, 2003). The activity of endoglucanase was<br />

quantified by CMC method (Ghosh, 1987) and the activities<br />

of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and peroxidase (PEO) was<br />

determined by Fehrmann and Dimond (1967).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

In vitro studies<br />

Among all the plant extracts P. juliflora showed highest<br />

inhibition on both fungi (81.2 % over A. tenuissima and 80.0<br />

% over F. solani) and followed by L. camara (66.7 % over A.<br />

tenuissima and 68.9 % over F. solani). In the present study<br />

significant differences in inhibition of mycelial growth was<br />

observed in A. tenuissima and F. solani by the interaction with<br />

T. viride and P. fluorescens. These two antagonists showed<br />

high levels of inhibition (80-88 %) as shown in table 2, where<br />

as T. pseudokoningii and T. harzianum showed moderate<br />

level of inhibition against both pathogenic fungi.<br />

In vivo studies<br />

All the tested plant products and bio-fungicides showed<br />

inhibitory effect on the growth of F. solani and A. tenuissima.<br />

The maximum survival percentage was recorded in T. viride<br />

and P. fluorescens (above 90 %) followed by T. harzianum<br />

(80 %). Incase of the treatments with plant extracts, P. juliflora<br />

(above 55 %) showed higher survival percentage and followed<br />

by L. camara (above 50 %). Mancozeb recorded 55 %<br />

survivability. Percent improvement of survivability over control<br />

under disease stress conditions of F. solani was recorded 85.0<br />

%, 70.0 %, 80.0 %, 45.0 %, 50.0 % and 45.0 % in the<br />

treatments with T. viride, T. harzianum, P. fluorescens, L.<br />

camara, P. juliflora and Mancozeb respectively. In case of A.<br />

tenuissima inoculated bags the percent improvement of<br />

survivability over control was recorded higher with 75.0 %,<br />

70.0 %, 75.0 %, 35.0 %, 40.0 % and 40.0 %.


Units/mL<br />

Specific activity/mg protein<br />

Specific activity/mg protein<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0.4<br />

0.35<br />

0.3<br />

0.25<br />

0.2<br />

0.15<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0<br />

I II III IV<br />

C I T.V P.F L.C P.J M<br />

Treatments<br />

I II III IV<br />

C I T.V P.F L.C P.J M<br />

Treatments<br />

I II III IV<br />

Endoglucanase<br />

Peroxidase<br />

Polyphenol oxidase<br />

C I T.V P.F L.C P.J M<br />

Treatments<br />

Figure 1: Effect of F. solani infection on the activity of defense<br />

enzymes of mulberry stem tissues at different stages of disease<br />

development under different treatments<br />

The present study disclose that, the plant extracts of P. juliflora<br />

and L. camara were found to be effective in inhibiting the<br />

growth of pathogenic fungi. The present findings are agreeing<br />

with the earlier reports of many researchers. Raghavendra et<br />

al., (2002) reported the fungi toxic properties of P. juliflora<br />

against eight species of Fusarium and one species of Alternaria.<br />

Antifungal properties of extracts of P. juliflora have also been<br />

reported by Muthulakshmi (1990) and Narasimhan et al.,<br />

(1991) against A. tenuissima. Ram and Thakore (2005) reported<br />

the extracts from L. camara were effective in inhibiting the<br />

growth of F. solani. In case of bio-fungicides P. fluorescens<br />

and T. viride were found to be effective in controlling F. solani<br />

95<br />

Table 2: Efficacy of antagonists against the mycelial growth of A.<br />

tenuissima and F. solani under in vitro conditions<br />

Name of the antagonist Inhibition of mycelial growth (%)<br />

A. tenuissima F. solani<br />

Trichoderma viride 87.7 88.9<br />

Trichoderma harzianum 64.4 68.9<br />

Trichoderma pseudokoningii 73.3 80.0<br />

Pseudomonas fluorescens 83.3 78.9<br />

Control 0.0 0.0<br />

C D (P d” 0.05) 2.61 2.66<br />

Units/mL<br />

Specific activity/mg protein<br />

Specific activity/mg protein<br />

0.4<br />

0.35<br />

0.3<br />

0.25<br />

0.2<br />

0.15<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

0<br />

EFFECT OF MEDICINAL PLANTS AND BIOFUNGICIDES<br />

I II III IV<br />

C I T.V P.F L.C P.J M<br />

Treatments<br />

I II III IV<br />

C I T.V P.F L.C P.J M<br />

Treatments<br />

I II III IV<br />

Endoglucanase<br />

Peroxidase<br />

Polyphenol oxidase<br />

C I T.V P.F L.C P.J M<br />

Treatments<br />

Figure 2: Effect of A. tenuissima infection on the activity of defense<br />

enzymes of mulberry stem tissues at different stages of disease development<br />

under different treatments<br />

and A. tenuissima. Philip et al., (1996) reported the<br />

antagonistic effect of a local isolate of T. harzianum against<br />

the mulberry root rot pathogen with 74 % protection to the<br />

mulberry plants. Dhoke (2005) reported the efficacy of<br />

fluorescent Pseudomonas isolates against some Fusarium<br />

species. Such effective inhibition of mycelial growth of F. solani


J. SEETHARAMULU et al.,<br />

Table 3: Efficacy of plant extracts and antagonistic fungi against the A. tenuissima and F. solani under simulated conditions (In vivo)<br />

Sl.No. Treatments No. of cuttings Soil inoculated with F. solani Soil inoculated with A. tenuissima<br />

planted No. of cuttings Survival Percent over No. of cuttings Survival Percent over<br />

survived % survived % control<br />

1 Trichoderma viride 20 19 95 + 85 18 90 + 75<br />

2 Trichoderma harzianum 20 16 80 + 70 17 85 + 70<br />

3 Pseudomonas fluorescens 20 18 90 + 80 18 90 + 75<br />

4 Lantana camara 20 11 55 + 45 10 50 + 35<br />

5 Prosopis juliflora 20 12 60 + 50 11 55 + 40<br />

6 Mancozeb 20 11 55 + 45 11 55 + 40<br />

7 Control 20 2 10 0 3 15 0<br />

+ = Increase over control ; Each value is an average of three replications<br />

by T. viride has been reported by Jha and Jalali (2006). Bohra<br />

et al., (2005) reported the treatment with Pseudomonas<br />

significantly reduces the disease severity of Fusarium wilt in<br />

the nursery. Mostapha et al., (2006) reported P. fluorescens<br />

have an excellent potential to be used as biocontol agents<br />

against mulberry root rot pathogens viz. B. theobromae, F.<br />

solani, F. oxysporum and R. solani. All these findings were<br />

agreeing with the present findings.<br />

It is finally reveals from the present research findings, the biofungicides<br />

viz, Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas<br />

fluorescens and Prosopis juliflora (plant extract) were suggested<br />

as pre-plantation treatment for effective control of cutting rot<br />

and die-back diseases of mulberry nursery.<br />

Defense enzymes<br />

The endoglucanase (β-1, 3- glucanase) activity under disease<br />

stress conditions of F. solani was high in T (15.7 %, 39.5 %,<br />

1<br />

30.5 % and 21.9 % at 1, 2, 3 and 4 stages respectively than<br />

the control) and T (20.6%, 42.8%, 25.2% and 27.1% at stage<br />

2<br />

1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively than the control) treated stems than<br />

all other treatments and control. Infection had a pronounced<br />

effect on endoglucanase activity and steep increase up to 2nd<br />

stage of infection, later slight decrease in the enzyme activity<br />

was noticed (Fig. 1). In case of the disease stress conditions of<br />

A. tenuissima, endoglucanase activity in T and T was<br />

1 2<br />

recorded very high than the control and infected stem.<br />

Remaining treatments also showed higher enzyme activity than<br />

the control at all the stages. Infection had a pronounced effect<br />

on peroxidase activity under the disease stress conditions of<br />

F. solani and resulted in steep increase at various stages of<br />

disease development. The higher enzyme activity was noticed<br />

in the T and T treatments. The enzyme activity was recorded<br />

1 2<br />

high by 31.1 %, 38.7 %, 64.5 % and 63.5 % in T and 30.9 %,<br />

1<br />

69.0 %, 73.3 % and 68.9 % in T at 1 2 st , 2nd , 3rd and 4th stage<br />

respectively than the control. Whereas the enzyme activity<br />

under the disease stress conditions of A. tenuissima all the<br />

treatments showed increased activity over control. In the<br />

treatments with bio-fungicide (T & T ) the enzyme activity was<br />

1 2<br />

found very high at all stages than the control.<br />

The activity of polyphenol oxidase under the disease stress of<br />

both the fungi showed gradual increase in all the treatments.<br />

T & T treatments recorded high enzyme activity. In the<br />

1 2<br />

treatments T and T also showed increased enzyme activity<br />

3 4<br />

over control. In case of A. tenuissima infection the enzyme<br />

activity in all the treated tissues was increased according to<br />

the stage than the control (Fig. 2). In case of T and T treatments<br />

1 2<br />

the enzyme activity was recorded higher than the infected<br />

stem tissues.<br />

96<br />

In the present study it was noticed that the activities of β-1, 3glucanase,<br />

PEO and PPO were increased in the plants treated<br />

with biofungicides and plant products than the control. Similar<br />

results were also found by many other researchers. According<br />

to Karthikeyan et al. (2005) the enzymes viz, chitinase, β-1, 3glucanase,<br />

peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase were induced<br />

in the A. palandui inoculated plants, whereas an additional<br />

increase in the synthesis of these enzymes was observed in<br />

the P. fluorescens Pf pretreated plants challenge-inoculated<br />

1<br />

with A. palandui.<br />

Increased PEO and PPO activity is a general phenomenon in<br />

the inoculated plants. According to Van Loon et al., 1998<br />

induction of defense enzymes makes the plant resistant to<br />

pathogen invasion. These results agreeing with the findings of<br />

Gupta et al. (2007) found higher amount of oxidative enzymes<br />

viz, catalase, poly phenol oxydase and peroxidase were<br />

present in anthracnose diseased leaves of French bean than<br />

healthy ones and resistant varieties showed higher enzyme<br />

activity than their susceptible counterparts. According to<br />

Kloepper et al. (1996) induction of systemic resistance may<br />

involve activation of multiple potential defense mechanisms,<br />

including increased activity of β- 1, 3- glucanases, peroxidase.<br />

Induced disease resistance has been demonstrated in a number<br />

of plants – pathogen interactions by Sticher et al. (1997).<br />

Alterations in the enzymatic activities due to infection of<br />

mulberry stem with Alternaria tenuissima and Fusarium solani<br />

were also evident. The activities of defence enzymes viz.<br />

endoglucanase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase were<br />

increased in the plants treated with bio-fungicides and plant<br />

products under disease stress conditions of both the<br />

pathogenic fungi at various stages of disease development.<br />

Further, the increased enzyme activities were observed in the<br />

mulberry stem tissues treated with Trichoderma viride and<br />

Pseudomonas fluorescens as compared to control and also in<br />

other treatments. Whereas in chemical treatment not much<br />

difference in the enzyme activity was observed when compared<br />

with corresponding healthy stem tissues. Prabhu et al. (2004)<br />

also reported that, there was an increase in the enzyme activity<br />

viz., peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase, when the plants<br />

were treated with plant products. Similarly the chemical<br />

compounds like phenols, alkaloids and primary metabolites<br />

also increased which it increases the resistance in plants. In<br />

case of diseases, the plant extracts may lock the susceptible<br />

sites that prevent the entry of pathogen into the plant. Perez et<br />

al. (2002) reported T. harzianum produce some fungal cell<br />

wall hydrolyzing enzymes within their biocontrol mechanism.<br />

According to Karthikeyan et al. (2005) the activity of β-1, 3glucanase<br />

was greatly induced in Pf treated plants as<br />

1


compared with controls and also showed significant increase<br />

in the levels of the defense enzymes in comparison to the<br />

plants challenged with the pathogen. According to<br />

Schlumbaum et al. (1986) and Velazhahan et al. (2003)<br />

chitinase and β-1, 3-glucanase have the potential to hydrolyze<br />

chitin and β-1, 3-glucan respectively, the major components<br />

of fungal cell walls, leading to direct inhibition growth of several<br />

fungi. The studies indicate that, the plant products and biofungicides<br />

are very much effective in controlling the disease<br />

and also facilitating as plant growth promoter by triggering the<br />

defense mechanism.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Awuah, R.T. 1989. Fungi toxic effects of extracts from some West<br />

African plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 115: 451-453.<br />

Bohra, S., Mathur, N. and Vyas, A. 2005. Biocontrol of Fusarium<br />

wilt by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol.<br />

35(3): 537.<br />

Dhoke, P.K. 2005. Efficacy of fluorescent Pseudomonas isolates against<br />

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp ciceri. Natl. sym: “Crop disease management<br />

in Dry land Agriculture”. Marathwada Agriculture University,<br />

Parbhani, January 12–14.<br />

Gupta, S., Kalha, C. S. and Gupta, V. 2007. Role of oxidative enzymes<br />

and biochemical constituents of French bean in imparting resistance<br />

against bean anthracnose. 2nd Asian Congress of Micology and Plant<br />

pathology. December 19-22, 2007. Organised by Indian Society of of<br />

Micology and Plant pathology, Osmania University, Hyderabad.<br />

(Abs.). p. 279.<br />

Gupta, V. P., Govindaiah. and Raju, H. V. 1997. Diseases and<br />

associated fungal pathogens of Mulberry nurseries. Indian Phytopath.<br />

50: 402 - 407.<br />

Hung, H. C. and Hoes, J. A. 1976. Penetration and infection of<br />

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by Coniothyrium minitans. Can. J. Bot. 54:<br />

406-410<br />

Jha, P. K. and Jalali, B. L. 2006. The bacterial soft rots of certain<br />

vegeTables-II: pectinase, the cytolytic enzyme produced by Bacillus<br />

carotovorus and certain other soft rot organisms. Tech. Bull. Vt. Agr.<br />

Exp. Sta. 147: 283-360.<br />

Karthikeyan, M., Jayakumar, V., Radhika, K., Bhaskaran, R.,<br />

Velazhahan, R. and Alice, D. 2005. Induction of resistance in host<br />

against the infection of leaf blight pathogen (Alternaria palandui) in<br />

onion (Allium cepa Var aggregatum). Indian J. of Biochem. and<br />

Biophysics., December 2005, pp. 371-377.<br />

Kloepper, J. W., Zehnder, G. W., Tuzun, S., Murphy, J. F., Wei, G.,<br />

Yao, C. and Raupach G. 1996. Toward agricultural implementation<br />

of PGPR – mediated induced systemic resistance against crop pests.<br />

In: Advances in Biological Control of plant Diseases (Eds. T. Wenhua,<br />

R.J. Cook and A. Rovira), China Agricultural University Press, Beijing,<br />

China. pp. 165-174.<br />

97<br />

EFFECT OF MEDICINAL PLANTS AND BIOFUNGICIDES<br />

McCallan, S. E. A. 1947. Bioassay of Agricultural fungicides, Agri<br />

chemicals. 2(9): 31 - 34.<br />

Mostapha, N. K., Esmaeil, K. and Afsaneh, M. 2006. Biological<br />

control of root rot pathogens in mulberry by antagonistic Bacteria.<br />

Sericologia. 46(2): 149-159.<br />

Muthulakshmi, P. 1990. Studies on fruit rot of Chillies (Capsicum<br />

annum L.) caused by Alternaria tenuis Nees. M.Sc (Ag) Thesis, Tamil<br />

Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.<br />

Narasimhan,V., Senthilnathan, V. and Vijayan, M. 1991. Efficacy of<br />

botanical Pesticides on two fungal pathogens of vegetables. Indian<br />

Phytopath., Suppl. issue of vol. 45: XCIX (Abs.).<br />

Perez, L. M., Besoain, X., Reyes, M., Parado, G. and Montealegre, J.<br />

2002. The expression of extra cellular fungal cell wall hydrolytic<br />

enzymes in different Trichoderma harzianum isolates correlate with<br />

their ability to control Pyrenochaeta lycopersici. Biological Research.<br />

35: 401-410.<br />

Philip, T., Sharma, D.D. and Govindaiah 1996. Biological control of<br />

mulberry root rot disease. Indian Silk., 34(1): 6 - 8.<br />

Prabhu, M., Mayavel, A. and Natarajan, S. 2004. Eco friendly plant<br />

disease management in vegetables by using botanicals. In: Natl. Sym.<br />

on ‘Recent trends in applied Biology’ (Abs.). Jointly organized by<br />

Avinashilingam Institute for Home science and Higher education for<br />

Women-Deemed University, Coimbatore and Regional Sericultural<br />

Research Station, Central Silk Board, Salem. January 28 – 29.<br />

Raghavendra, M. P., Satish, S. and Raveesha, K. A. 2002. Prosopis<br />

juliflora Swartz: A potential plant for the management of fungal diseases<br />

of crops. In: Asian Cong. Mycol. Pl. Pathol., Indian Soc. Mycol. Pl.<br />

Pathol. University of Mysore (Abstracts) October 1-4. p.136.<br />

Ram, J. and Thakore, B. B. L. 2005. Management of storage rot of<br />

ginger using plant extracts and bio-control agent in southern Rajasthan.<br />

J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol. 35(3): 539.<br />

Rangaswamy, G. and Mahadevan, A. 2001. Diseases of crop plants<br />

in India (Fourth Edition), P H I PVT Ltd, New Delhi, pp. 536.<br />

Schlumbaum, A., Mauch, F., Vogeli, U. and Boller T. 1986. Nature.<br />

324: 365-367.<br />

Seetha, R. J., Raja Gopal Reddy, C. and Ramanjaneyulu, R. 2008.<br />

Incidence of Alternaria tenuissima on the stem cuttings during its<br />

development as sapling. Indian J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 38(1): 130-<br />

131<br />

Seetha, R. J., Rajagopal Reddy, C. and Ramanjaneyulu, R. 2004.<br />

Nursery level incidence of A. tenuissima on stem cuttings of mulberry<br />

(Morus sp.) In: “Natl sym. on recent trends in plant sciences and 27th All India Botanical Conference”, October 29-31, 2004. Department<br />

of Botany, S.K. University, Anantapur, A. P, p.34<br />

Sticher, L., Mauch-Mani, B. and Metraux J. P. 1997. Annu Rev<br />

Phytopathol. 35: 235-270.<br />

Van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M. and Pieterse, C. M. J. 1998.<br />

Annu Rev Phytopathol. 36:453-483.<br />

Velazhahan, R., Jayaraj, J., Liang, G. H. and Muthukrishnan, S. 2003.<br />

Biol. Plant. 46: 29-33.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!