F OCUS - American Foreign Service Association

F OCUS - American Foreign Service Association F OCUS - American Foreign Service Association

22.03.2013 Views

National Security Infrastructure: Due for an Update? On April 18 the Congressional Research Service released its latest report on national security, “Organizing the U.S. Government for National Security: Overview of the Interagency Reform Debates” (www.fas.org/sgp/ crs/natsec/RL34455.pdf). Senior officials in the executive branch, various think-tanks and members of Congress are among those calling for a significant restructuring of the American security model. This group argues that today’s 20thcentury bureaucratic superstructure is 10 FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL/JULY-AUGUST 2008 CYBERNOTES outdated, an “inadequate basis for protecting the nation from 21st-century security challenges.” They cite the failures of coordination and implementation in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom and the response to Hurricane Katrina. These shortcomings have had a serious effect on the results of those missions and on the reputation of the United States. Both Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have called for reforms. At an April 15 House Armed Services Committee hearing, Gates challenged the members to “think about how to Site of the Month: www.docuticker.com As a librarian and the director of Online Information Resources at Ask.com, Gary Price has spent his career seeking out Internet resources for people, sorting through the overwhelming amount of information available online and narrowing it down to the best research sources around. This master of library and information science founded Docuticker as an independent venture in 2004. Docuticker describes itself as offering “a hand-picked selection of resources, reports and publications from government agencies, NGOs, think-tanks and other public interest organizations.” Recent reports have included an FBI report on immigration applications and petitions, a New America Foundation report on employer health costs in a global economy, and a RAND corporation study on the persistent Taliban threat in Pakistan. Users can either subscribe to the free, weekly newsletter (sent straight to their e-mail inbox) or visit the site and use the simple search function in the upper right-hand corner. By specifying date or subject, users can browse for the most relevant reports and documents released in any given month over the last four years. Alternatively, users can simply type one word or phrase, such as “human rights,” “globalization” or “national security,” and see all relevant documents. Each post features an abstract taken directly from the source and a link to the free, full-text document. Updated on a daily basis, Docuticker is a quality resource for both periodic Web browsing and more substantial research. Ariana Austin, Editorial Intern restructure the national security apparatus of the government for the long term.” Think-tanks that have joined this effort include the Project on National Security Reform (www.pnsr.org) and the Center for a New American Security (www.cnas.org). Both represent nonpartisan interest groups devoted to an overhaul of the current national security system. The founder of PNSR, James Locher III, directed the development of the Goldwater-Nichols legislation in the 1980s. His organization’s goal is to once more craft new legislation, this time in the form of a new National Security Act. Meanwhile, on June 2, CNAS held a conference, “Pivot Point: New Directions for American Security,” which focused on ways to address these challenges. An event transcript is available at www.cnas.org/june2008/. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Armed Services Committee are also part of this effort. The HASC has held a series of hearings on the issue, and, according to the CRS report, SFRC Chairman Joseph Biden “explicitly stated an interest in coming up with a ‘2009 National Security Act.’” This would replace the National Security Act of 1947, designed to meet the specific needs of a post-World War II, the last major organizational reform in this realm. Besides inadequate interagency coordination, criticisms of the current structure center on the imbalance between the Department of Defense and the State Department and other

foreign affairs agencies. The CRS report cites the claim of many that DOD is doing too much while State is doing too little, noting that often the latter has the authority while the former has the resources. The process by which executive branch agencies and presidential advisers present and prioritize issues for presidential decision has also come under criticism. Proposed reforms include creation of a body specifically devoted to interagency coordination of national security operations, one that includes a new position of “presidential adviser;” creation of a national security budget; reorganization of congressional oversight; and strengthening of the guidance of national security. One recommendation calls for the White House to coordinate missions, instructing the appropriate agencies with clear direction on roles, resources and responsibilities. There seems little question that a change is in store, whether significant or slight. For as the CRS report notes, C YBERNOTES Ithink that a big problem the State Department has had both with respect to training and to planning is that the [Foreign] Service is too small to have a sizable enough float of people ... We have thousands of people involved in planning in DOD. And tens of thousands of people in training at any given time, in advanced training, not just basic training. — Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, addressing the American Academy of Diplomacy, May 14, www.defenselink.mil/ transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=4230. 50 Years Ago... There never seems to be much trouble about getting appropriations for our military forces ... [Yet] when it comes to getting money to promote peace … there is always a tough argument. “Almost entirely missing from the debates, to this point, are counterarguments about the strengths of the status quo.” — Ariana Austin, Editorial Intern Terrorism in Decline, Says New Study A report issued in May challenges the expert consensus that the threat of global terrorism is increasing. The Human Security Brief 2007, produced by a research team at Simon Fraser University’s School for International Studies in Vancouver, documents a sharp net decline in the incidence of terrorist violence around the world (www.humansecuritybrief. info/). According to the report, fatalities from terrorism have declined by 40 percent, while the loose-knit terror network associated with Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaida has suffered a dramatic collapse in popular support in the Muslim world. Further, there has been a positive, but largely unnoticed, change in sub- — U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Henry Cabot Lodge, quoted in the July 1958 FSJ. JULY-AUGUST 2008/FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL 11

foreign affairs agencies. The CRS<br />

report cites the claim of many that<br />

DOD is doing too much while State is<br />

doing too little, noting that often the<br />

latter has the authority while the former<br />

has the resources.<br />

The process by which executive<br />

branch agencies and presidential<br />

advisers present and prioritize issues<br />

for presidential decision has also come<br />

under criticism.<br />

Proposed reforms include creation<br />

of a body specifically devoted to interagency<br />

coordination of national security<br />

operations, one that includes a new<br />

position of “presidential adviser;” creation<br />

of a national security budget;<br />

reorganization of congressional oversight;<br />

and strengthening of the guidance<br />

of national security. One recommendation<br />

calls for the White House<br />

to coordinate missions, instructing the<br />

appropriate agencies with clear direction<br />

on roles, resources and responsibilities.<br />

There seems little question that a<br />

change is in store, whether significant<br />

or slight. For as the CRS report notes,<br />

C YBERNOTES<br />

<br />

Ithink that a big problem the State Department has had both with respect<br />

to training and to planning is that the [<strong>Foreign</strong>] <strong>Service</strong> is too small to<br />

have a sizable enough float of people ... We have thousands of people<br />

involved in planning in DOD. And tens of thousands of people in training<br />

at any given time, in advanced training, not just basic training.<br />

— Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, addressing the<br />

<strong>American</strong> Academy of Diplomacy, May 14, www.defenselink.mil/<br />

transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=4230.<br />

50 Years Ago...<br />

There never seems to be much trouble about getting<br />

appropriations for our military forces ... [Yet] when it<br />

comes to getting money to promote peace … there is always<br />

a tough argument.<br />

“Almost entirely missing from the<br />

debates, to this point, are counterarguments<br />

about the strengths of the<br />

status quo.”<br />

— Ariana Austin, Editorial Intern<br />

Terrorism in Decline,<br />

Says New Study<br />

A report issued in May challenges<br />

the expert consensus that the threat<br />

of global terrorism is increasing. The<br />

Human Security Brief 2007, produced<br />

by a research team at Simon<br />

Fraser University’s School for International<br />

Studies in Vancouver, documents<br />

a sharp net decline in the incidence<br />

of terrorist violence around the<br />

world (www.humansecuritybrief.<br />

info/).<br />

According to the report, fatalities<br />

from terrorism have declined by 40<br />

percent, while the loose-knit terror<br />

network associated with Osama bin<br />

Laden’s al-Qaida has suffered a dramatic<br />

collapse in popular support in<br />

the Muslim world.<br />

Further, there has been a positive,<br />

but largely unnoticed, change in sub-<br />

— U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Henry Cabot Lodge,<br />

quoted in the July 1958 FSJ.<br />

JULY-AUGUST 2008/FOREIGN SERVICE JOURNAL 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!