Peach palm - World Agroforestry Centre
Peach palm - World Agroforestry Centre
Peach palm - World Agroforestry Centre
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1 0 <strong>Peach</strong> <strong>palm</strong>. Bactris gasipaes Kunth<br />
7 Mora-Urpí collected Chontilla in 1988, and planted it in the University of Costa Rica germplasm collection.<br />
It looks like a small G. insignis but is found 2000 km from Bolivia and on the other side of the Andes. It has<br />
not been described by a Bactris specialist.<br />
8 MacBride (1960) thought this a nomen nodum, but Glassman (1972) accepted it, renaming it B.<br />
dahlgreniana. Clement et al. (1989) provided extensive numerical data on B. dahlgreniana populations in<br />
Rondonia and Acre, Brazil, and recently found a new population further west in Amazonas.<br />
9 This is the only small-fruited species accepted by Henderson (1995), since he places all other small-fruited<br />
Guilielmas in synonymy with it, but his argument that this is the ancestral form of B. gasipaes essentially<br />
reduces it to synonymy with B. gasipaes.<br />
10 Dugand (1976) suggested that B. caribaea was synonymous with G. macana, but never published a formal<br />
proposal.<br />
11 Mora-Urpí collected Darien in 1986, and planted it in the University of Costa<br />
Rica germplasm collection. It looks somewhat like a B. dahlgreniana or B. macana, but has not been<br />
described by a Bactris specialist.<br />
12 A US-AID financed prospection team collected Ca-Pu in 1984 (Clement and Coradin 1988). It looks like<br />
a Guilielma, but is quite unlike B. gasipaes. Unfortunately, none of the seed germinated, so it is not<br />
represented in any germplasm collection.<br />
13 Collected in 1996 in Cerro Hoya National Park, Panama by J. Mora-Urpí and planted in the University<br />
of Costa Rica germplasm collection. It has not been described.<br />
The distribution of peach <strong>palm</strong> today involves a complex pattern of landraces (Mora-Urpí<br />
1984; Clement 1988; Mora-Urpí and Clement 1988; Mora-Urpí 1992). It has been divided into<br />
Occidental and Oriental subcomplexes based on vegetative differences (Mora-Urpí 1984), and<br />
further divided into classes based on fruit size (Mora-Urpí and Clement 1988; Mora-Urpí 1992;<br />
Mora-Urpí et al. 1993): the ‘microcarpa’ landraces have small fruits (