22.03.2013 Views

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Based on cyclic testing of the known system, a normalization technique is<br />

used such that data from conventional walls is compared to data collected<br />

on SIP assembles. There are four criteria that are examined:<br />

1. Ultimate Load<br />

2. Stiffness<br />

3. Deflection at allowable story drift, and<br />

4. Normalized cumulative energy dissipation<br />

If the SIP systems demonstrate equivalence to the light framed systems<br />

based on the above criteria, it can be considered that the SIP systems have<br />

equivalent seismic design coefficients, as given in the 2003 IBC (ICC), for<br />

light framed walls sheathed with wood structural panels. Based on limited<br />

testing of SIP assemblies with sealants, the assemblies can meet the<br />

aforementioned criteria. It should be noted that since the performance of<br />

SIP systems is sensitive to fastener type and sealant formulation, additional<br />

matched tests may be required with significant changes in sealant formulation<br />

and fastener type.<br />

38-15-1 E Karacabeyli, M Yasumura, G C Foliente, A Ceccotti<br />

Background information on ISO standard 16670 for cyclic testing of<br />

connections<br />

Abstract<br />

ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Technical Committee<br />

on Timber Structures (ISO TC 165) convened in 1995 a working group<br />

(WG7) for the development of international standards for connections. As<br />

a first priority, the WG7 worked with a group of international experts and<br />

developed the ISO Standard 16670 "Timber Structures – Joints made with<br />

mechanical fasteners – Quasi-static reversed-cyclic test method" to provide<br />

a cyclic test method as a basis for derivation of parameters which are<br />

required in seismic design of timber structures. The cyclic test protocol in<br />

this standard was used in various research studies in testing of joints as<br />

well as shear walls. In this paper, the basic features and application of the<br />

ISO 16670 are presented along with its differences with respect to other<br />

standards.<br />

Conclusion and Recommendations<br />

The background information and some key features of ISO Standard<br />

16670 for cyclic testing of joints in timber structures under earthquake<br />

loads are presented. Because the standard was developed through international<br />

collaboration, it is used and referenced in many countries. The inclusion<br />

of ISO 16670 cyclic displacement schedule in the ASTM Standard<br />

2126 (cyclic testing of shearwalls) is a positive step towards international<br />

harmonization. It is recommended that a similar step be considered by other<br />

national standards committees. It is also recommended that research<br />

studies include reference tests conducted with ISO 16670 schedule to enhance<br />

the comparability of results from other studies.<br />

As performance-based engineering becomes more common in the design<br />

of structures, designers will increasingly rely on the performance data<br />

provided by testing, which reflects the demands from in-service conditions.<br />

International standards provide a consistent basis for performance<br />

comparison of systems and exchange of technical information, and facilitate<br />

cooperative efforts to develop analytical models and improved design<br />

procedures for timber construction.<br />

39-15-2 M Follesa, M P Lauriola, C Minowa, N Kawai, C Sandhaas, M<br />

Yasumura, A Ceccotti<br />

Which seismic behaviour factor for multi-storey buildings made of<br />

cross-laminated wooden panels?<br />

Abstract<br />

Day by day, multi-storey buildings made of cross-laminated wooden panels<br />

(XLam) are becoming a stronger and economically valid alternative to<br />

their counteracts built with concrete and masonry. Throughout Europe and<br />

even in seismic prone zones, this construction type is gaining a broader<br />

acceptance.<br />

However, until now, in Eurocode 8 this constructive system is not yet<br />

included and no recommendations are given regarding constructive details.<br />

Especially regarding the value of the seismic behaviour factor to be used<br />

in seismic design of this new typology of wooden buildings, no comprehensive<br />

investigations have yet been undertaken.<br />

In this paper, results from shaking table tests on a three-storey crosslaminated<br />

wooden building are presented and the value of the seismic behaviour<br />

factor is found on the base of the actual response of the building to<br />

one quake.<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 5 SPECIAL ACTIONS page 5.24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!