21.03.2013 Views

regional wood energy development programme in asia ... - CES (IISc)

regional wood energy development programme in asia ... - CES (IISc)

regional wood energy development programme in asia ... - CES (IISc)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 WOODFUEL END-USER GROUPS<br />

Woodfuels are used extensively by both the domestic and <strong>in</strong>dustrial sectors. However, there<br />

have been substantial changes <strong>in</strong> the past, due to the shift <strong>in</strong> the availability of other fuels. Before<br />

1970, when kerosene was available both <strong>in</strong> urban and rural areas, the government through the<br />

Industrial Development Corporation (IDC), <strong>in</strong>troduced the kerosene stove which was widely used<br />

because of its low cost and convenience. However, <strong>in</strong> the mid-seventies, kerosene supplies<br />

became unavailable and the kerosene stove had to be abandoned. Later, the government tried to<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduce gas stoves but, aga<strong>in</strong> because of the supply problem, the fuel could not be relied upon<br />

for daily use. At present, both domestic and cottage <strong>in</strong>dustries depend largely on biomass <strong>energy</strong>,<br />

especially <strong>wood</strong>fuel <strong>in</strong> the form of fuel<strong>wood</strong>, bamboo fuel and charcoal. In urban centres where<br />

electricity is available, electric stoves are also used. But due to the erratic electricity supply these<br />

cannot be relied upon.<br />

Many of the government departments concerned with <strong>energy</strong>, such as the <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />

agriculture, rural <strong>development</strong>, <strong>energy</strong>, and forestry departments etc. are now tak<strong>in</strong>g a very keen<br />

<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g fuel efficient biomass burn<strong>in</strong>g stoves and furnaces. However, only a limited<br />

number of these improved devices have been <strong>in</strong> actual use or made available on a commercial<br />

basis; the rest are largely still <strong>in</strong> the research and <strong>development</strong> stages.<br />

6.1 Domestic and Institutional Users<br />

Most people <strong>in</strong> rural areas still use threestone<br />

fires for cook<strong>in</strong>g. Although the thermal<br />

efficiency of these fires is low (<strong>in</strong> the order of only 10-<br />

15%) compared with the total <strong>energy</strong> delivered by the<br />

fuel, there are a number of additional benefits<br />

associated with their use: part of the heat and/or<br />

smoke emitted can be used for the preservation of<br />

food and roof structures, as a mosquito repellent,<br />

and often for warmth <strong>in</strong> colder areas. Attempts at<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g improved domestic fuel<strong>wood</strong> and residue<br />

burn<strong>in</strong>g cookstoves, therefore, have been made by a<br />

number of organizations.<br />

The Forest Department through the Forest<br />

Research Institute (FRI) based <strong>in</strong> Yez<strong>in</strong> developed a<br />

fire<strong>wood</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g stove dur<strong>in</strong>g 1986-7, locally known<br />

as "one stick stove". A number of stoves us<strong>in</strong>g this<br />

design was produced and sold on a pilot basis for 50<br />

kyats. While the fuel<strong>wood</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g feature was amply<br />

demonstrated, the local stove producers did not<br />

desire to produce the new designs commercially due<br />

to the complicated production steps and its heavy<br />

weight.<br />

25<br />

Figure 6.1 One stick stove <strong>in</strong><br />

a kitchen of FRI worker

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!