The Death of Christian Britain
The Death of Christian Britain
The Death of Christian Britain
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
— <strong>The</strong> Salvation Economy —<br />
and Protestant, were so alike as to seem virtually indistinguishable.’ 27 In<br />
this way, both Protestant and Catholic had stakes in the salvation economy.<br />
Nonetheless, in ‘the Evangelical century’ it was Protestant evangelicals<br />
<strong>of</strong> Nonconformity who were critical, exerting an influence well beyond<br />
their numbers. 28 Evangelicalism was the crucible for both personal<br />
redemption and for social policy to solve urban–industrial problems. As<br />
Bebbington has rightly stated, ‘it called for souls to be saved one by one,<br />
and yet held up standards <strong>of</strong> a just society that could <strong>of</strong>ten be imposed<br />
only at the expense <strong>of</strong> individual freedom’. 29 Evangelicalism provided a<br />
complex model for a democratic and harmonious society. As such, the<br />
salvation revolution was no middle-class monopoly as too many historians<br />
have portrayed it. From its very inception in the 1790s and 1800s, it was<br />
interacting with the formation <strong>of</strong> bourgeois and plebeian identities in equal<br />
measure. And the means by which it did this was the salvation industry.<br />
THE SALVATION INDUSTRY<br />
Whatever arguments continued after 1800 about the role <strong>of</strong> the state in the<br />
nation’s religious life, evangelicalism placed the responsibility for collective<br />
moral action at the door <strong>of</strong> the free moral agents <strong>of</strong> a ‘democratic’,<br />
individualistic society. It was to them that the construction <strong>of</strong> the salvation<br />
industry devolved.<br />
<strong>The</strong> starting point was the congregation. <strong>The</strong> congregation became<br />
characterised not merely as a body <strong>of</strong> people who met on a Sunday for<br />
worship, but as a centre <strong>of</strong> social faith. <strong>The</strong> congregation was composed<br />
<strong>of</strong> voluntary organisations which emerged from the 1780s and 1790s with<br />
the dedicated aim <strong>of</strong> rescuing for Christ the adult ‘lapsed masses’, the<br />
young, and the native peoples <strong>of</strong> <strong>Britain</strong>’s emerging empire. <strong>The</strong> individual<br />
did this firstly through giving money and secondly through giving time to<br />
work as Sunday school teachers, tract distributors, collectors, penny-bank<br />
organisers, and supporters <strong>of</strong> literally hundreds <strong>of</strong> other religious voluntary<br />
organisations. <strong>The</strong> bulk <strong>of</strong> these organisations became congregationally<br />
based though others were interdenominational local organisations for a<br />
given city or town. <strong>The</strong> voluntary organisation became the hallmark <strong>of</strong><br />
modern religion. 30 It defined belonging, and it defined exclusion. A vast<br />
new territory was formed to which were entrusted the meanings <strong>of</strong> ‘being<br />
religious’ and ‘being irreligious’.<br />
<strong>The</strong> congregation was a club. Getting into it defined one state <strong>of</strong> ‘being<br />
religious’; being excluded or, worse, ejected from it defined one state <strong>of</strong><br />
‘being irreligious’. Being a member <strong>of</strong> another ‘club’ met with varying<br />
degrees <strong>of</strong> approval depending on whether it was doctrinally and socially<br />
in close affinity; some clubs were beyond the pale for being distant in<br />
belief and practice and some for being too close, especially when they were<br />
43